Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 253 total)
  • Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Neither, in particular. Property is a very expensive commodity to trade, because of high entry and exit costs. I'm a long-term investor and I'm just going to ride it out. Though I do think there will be some good bargains around the next couple of years, and I plan to expand my portfolio as opportunities arise.

    I don't respond to overall market conditions, as I don't rely entirely on the market for profit. I only buy properties where I can instantly create equity (by buying under market value, developing or improving, and/or obtaining favourable finance terms) and then hold.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    If you want to talk accuracy, you're absolutely right. But this isn't about accuracy, it's about keeping your eye on the big picture, and realising that setting rents and sale prices is not and never will be such an exacting science. Notice that your rent went from $190 to $200 per week – not from $189.54 to $201.62? That's because we round off and figure it will all "come out in the wash".
     
    These few dollars are incredibly trivial in the context of the magnitude of dollars in and out during ownership of an investment property. Assuming your property is worth, say, $250,000, you're talking about an average effect (over 4 years, 1 leap year and 3 non-leap-years) of less than $3 per month, or 0.0143% per year.
    Given that residential yields vary between, say, 2.5 and 12%, and CG between -5 and 35%, I just can't imagine on what basis you could argue that 0.0143% will ever be of any significance.

    I can just imagine the PM ringing the tenant and explaining that they now have to pay $871.43 instead of the previously advised $866.66 because of the vagaries of the Gregorian calendar etc…. I expect the result would be that both tenant and PM think the landlord is a – – well, politeness prevents me saying the word!

    The PM is managing, and the tenant occupying, my very valuable asset. I'd rather they feel motivated to look out for my best interests than get the few extra bucks. Not even a remotely close call in my view.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Don't sweat the small stuff. Really.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I'm with astrawan – I really think a good solicitor could sort this out very quickly by sending one sternly worded letter to the real estate agent telling them that they have no legal right to withhold the deposit. If the vendor feels the purchaser acted in bad faith, let them initiate legal action, but that's not grounds for withholding the deposit.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I have really mixed feelings about NLP. My predominant sentiment is that it's just so creepy.

    Anthony Robbins is a master at manipulating a crowd and creating mass hysteria, and he sure can pump a crowd. He works people up into such a state that they're going to feel great whatever he says, at least for a short while. But these techniques – which are very well known in social psychology – make me cringe. If you have valuable information to present, then you shouldn't need to use "psychological manipulation" to get your message across. 

    And it seems to me – admittedly no expert and quite prepared to be corrected – that his whole message could be summarised as 1) decide what you want out of life, 2) believe that you can achieve it, and 3) go after it.

    One big concern I have is that people who are into network marketing (I don't want to start on that, but let's say I'm far from a fan of MLM/NM) seem to love it, but they seem to go for years "improving" themselves, and very few of them ever seem to actually achieve anything tangible. They're always "in the process" of manifesting success, but I don't see too many results. And they use MLM/NM techniques to distribute the "free" seminar tickets, for crying out loud. And just the fact that somebody who'd be attracted to MLM would also be attracted to NLP makes me highly suspicious.

    NLP also seems to be full of pseudo-science, which I loathe. Statements like "quantum physics has proved …" where the thing they're talking about – such as thoughts changing reality – has NOTHING to do with quantum physics. NLP fans also seem to love Dr Emoto's research showing that prettier water crystals form when you breathe on them saying positive words than negative words. PUH-LEASE!  And many NLP practitioners seem to be right into other junk science like alternative medicine, faddish nutritional supplements, and organic food.

    And of course, if you've been through the NLP training, I'm sure you're already programmed to read my post and say "oh, she's so blocked and negative, I'm not going to allow her negative energy into my thoughts". Just like cults say about "non-believers". It seems very cult-like in many aspects.

    Now, that's a lot of negative energy that I have towards NLP. The only thing countering all this negativity and arousing some curiosity in me is that I know a few people that I really respect who seem to advocate it. This intrigues me – these are people who seem to me to have no need for such a thing as NLP, as they're already very successful. I have no idea why they're attracted to NLP.

    But perhaps there are some forumites out there who can enlighten me as to the attraction of these courses…. perhaps I'm really missing something. If I have it totally wrong, I apologise. I'm not meaning to be offensive – just sharing my sincere perceptions, formed over a number of years of interactions with those who've participated in NLP training.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Absolutely, Cat159!

    My wonderful solicitor cashed my cheque 5 weeks before the contract went unconditional, but still didn't do the searches until after it went unconditional… I just assumed they'd been done when I PAID him

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    If the contract never went unconditional, surely the real estate agent is obliged to release the deposit back to your friend immediately. (At least I think they would be in QLD.) It would be up to the vendor to take legal action to prevent release, rather than the onus being on your friend to try and get her money back. The default position if an unconditional contract falls over is the deposit being refunded.

    The vendor may have "instructed the agent not to release the deposit", but I wouldn't have thought the vendor had the power to issue these instructions, ie no obligation on part of RE agent to comply. On what basis has your friend had previous advice that the vendor is entitled to withhold the deposit – is that when the RE agent thought it was because she missed the 4pm deadline? If so, advise the RE agent that the vendor's position is now that she did not make legitimate endeavours to obtain finance, in which case, that's not grounds for the deposit to be withheld; it's grounds for the vendor to pursue your friend in court (which I don't think they'll do anyway).

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I think you'll find that most people who are active enough in their investments to be involved with propertyinvesting.com, don't tend to use financial advisers much. For a start, I suspect most hold a lot of their wealth in property, about which financial advisers generally know very little. (Or at least don't recommend as there are no commissions to be made.)

    Having said that, I certainly think that financial advisers have their place, and I hope somebody is able to recommend a good one for you. (I'm not, sorry!)

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I've written a blog entitled "Developing the right property investing strategy for your circumstances" which I hope you find helpful as a starting point.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Why do you want to sell so quickly? If it's because you believe you've made a capital gain and want to move on to another investment, then forget the FHOG and just sell it now. I just can't imagine what situation you'd be in that would make this strategy a good one for you. Perhaps you can explain?

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Milly, as much as I might feel sorry for Jack, I think you're being very unfair on the landlords. I'm not commenting on their technique, as it sounds like they could be nicer about it and they certainly should abide by the law, but in principle, I don't think it's fair to say that the landlords can't have access to their property because an old man lives in it. Jack's not their responsibility.

    I truly hope Jack finds a fantastic support living environment that suits him better anyway.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Rohan, I personally wouldn't be interested in a deal like this, but without knowing what your investment objectives are, it's hard to say. Could you afford a negative cashflow? Do you want to be able to add value? How long do you plan to hold?

    This investment doesn't show that strong a return, but it probably would be pretty "set and forget" and would work out OK over the very long term.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I would always use a solicitor rather than conveyancer. The title search wouldn't show drainage problems, the "plumbing and drainage search" did. Always do all searches that could affect your decision to purchase – which is potentially all of them. Ask for advice and don't go stupid, but don't just do the absolutely minimal suite either.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I've noticed the same thing, but afraid I have no solution to offer :(

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    It may be common practice to put off a lot of work until the contract goes unconditional, but it's a recipe for disaster. I bought a particular property a year ago, where six weeks after settlement we discovered enormous problems with drainage of the property which showed up in searches. My solicitor hadn't done searches until after the contract had gone unconditional, and even then hadn't provided me with the search results. Had I known about these problems prior to the contract going unconditional, I may have been able to renegotiate the price, or I would have made sure that I didn't get a finance approval. (As it was a problem that cost nearly 20% of the property's value to fix.)

    In QLD, anyway, it is professional negligence to act in this manner and in contravention of the QLD Law Society conveyancing protocol – though it's still a common practise. For your own sake, insist on the searches being done, and seeing all the results, before going unconditional.

    And to add insult to injury, because I'm a clever girl  and managed to develop this property anyway and make a profit despite this disaster, my solicitor is negligent but my damages are assessed at nil – it doesn't cost him a cent! I can't prove how much less I would have paid if I'd known, and if I'd cancelled the contract, then I wouldn't have made the development profit. So the law says that his negligence caused me to make a profit that otherwise I wouldn't have made. The whole sorry debacle will be in April's API – it nearly sent us bankrupt.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257
    wealth4life.com wrote:
    his newsletter states he has been an accountant for 25 years when our research shows this is not the case at all ????

    I'd be more concerned about this statement, alleging deception. He actually says that he's "a qualified accountant with over 25 years experience". I think that even if what your research shows is that he's not been a qualified accountant for 25 years, he could well argue that he's a) a qualified accountant, and b) has over 25 years experience (as a property investor, in life, in anything!).

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    I'm with Jaffasoft insofar as I wouldn't bother trying to retrieve my $1, but I certainly wouldn't use the word "disgusting" to describe those who view things differently.  On principle, I would collect, I just can't be bothered with $1. If it were $10, I'd be more inclined to add $10 to the rent to compensate rather than chase it separately.

    I think it's important to keep perspective; so many investors seem to be "penny wise and pound foolish". If we paid as much attention to structuring, having the right insurance, and purchasing the right property, then these issues (hopefully) wouldn't be deemed worth our attention. And I get that it's not "either/or", that you can do those big things properly and also get your $1, but it's about mindset. I don't want to exert any of my effort on trivia; I want to keep my eye on the big picture.

    Kind of like how I don't believe in being frugal with small stuff – the mental effort/discipline required to save a few bucks on groceries or petrol could be far more profitably spent elsewhere, negating the need to be frugal with these items. (And yes, of course it's different if I actually didn't have enough money to pay for the groceries, but those in that situation presumably aren't on a property investing forum!)

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Not a recommendation as I haven't used them myself, but many say that Terri Scheer is the specialist in landlords' insurance http://www.terrischeer.com.au and I have heard that they are very good.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Oh, mez67, I am sorry to hear that the house was in such bad condition. Thanks for sharing your situation with others so that hopefully they will learn the lesson cheaper than you did! I do hope that doing the subdivision retrieves the situation for you.

    Profile photo of trakkatrakka
    Member
    @trakka
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 257

    Everybody's fallible. And in fairness, they didn't "lose" your money; they just didn't clear your cheque as quickly as you wanted. I've had experiences as bad or worse (in terms of the bank's performance) at just about every bank and branch I've ever dealt with. It's not good, but life's full of disappointments.
     
     Perhaps an anger management course would be helpful? Seriously, I'm concerned that you'll have a stroke if you get so stressed about stuff like this!

Viewing 20 posts - 101 through 120 (of 253 total)