A company cannot own a trust. A company might be acting as trustee for a discretionary trust. The company would own the property, the company would be the borrower with the director of the borrower giving a personal guarantee. The lender would want the company to enter into the contract as trustee of the trust and have a right of indemnity out…[Read more]

It doesn’t matter what an accountant says as this would require legal advice.

This might be taken out of context or is a bit vague. First what are you trying to protection the property from? Creditors on bankruptcy? A trustee of a discretionary trust can still hold a property and let a beneficiary use it, perhaps rent free, if they have…[Read more]

It doesn’t matter what an accountant says as this would require legal advice.

This might be taken out of context or is a bit vague. First what are you trying to protection the property from? Creditors on bankruptcy? A trustee of a discretionary trust can still hold a property and let a beneficiary use it, perhaps rent free, if they have…[Read more]

There are banks other than the big 4 – actually one is a big 4 – that will disregard personal guarantees if the borrower is self funded. It is just a contingent liability for the guarantor so they are only liable if the borrower defaults.

There are none in Australia as far as I know

If you are investing in personal names you would be paying the same interest rate, generally, as a corporate trustee would be.

speak to a town planner to see if it is possible to do first.

as a lawyer specialising on trusts I wish I could charge this much for advice on trusts.

This strategy works with companies – the company could be acting as a trustee or be acting in its personal capacity. i.e. a trust is optional – and in fact should be avoided in many cases due to the land tax laws.

This doesn’t sound good to me. I think you should get some alternative tax advice – might be too late to fix things though.

At the very least it might be worth shifting the cash in the offset to the loan on your main residence and to break this fixed period.

You could also consider investing in a different entity, a more tax effective one,…[Read more]

This doesn’t sound good to me. I think you should get some alternative tax advice – might be too late to fix things though.

At the very least it might be worth shifting the cash in the offset to the loan on your main residence and to break this fixed period.

You could also consider investing in a different entity, a more tax effective one,…[Read more]

The answer will depend on the ownership structure for the existing properties as well as the business and the new investment. Plus your expectation on returns..

The answer will depend on the ownership structure for the existing properties as well as the business and the new investment. Plus your expectation on returns..

If the trustee is going to borrow money it might as well open an account at the same bank it gets its loan from – ideally an offset account.

You cannot take out equity, all you can do is borrow money. You can do this by using the property as security for a loan and borrow the deposit and stamp duty etc for the new property. But the interest will not be deductible because the deductibility is determined by the use of the borrowed money – which isn’t income producing in this case.

They are statements not questions

but

1. No that is not correct

2. No that is not correct – loans have no bearing on CGT

It is generally the contract dates – but not always.

It is possible, but something you should seek specific legal advice on.

Yes, it could be either

a) cost base reset to the value at date first income producing

or

b) above plus using the 6 year rule and apportioning.

seek tax advice

It will depend on the circumstances, such as, if PI or IO, what the expenses are, how long left on the loan, type of property, type of tenancy, yield etc

Assuming PI residential rate with minimum expenses it would probably neither improve nor decrease serviceability