PropertyInvesting.com | Nat R | Activity https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/nat-r/activity/ Activity feed for Nat R. Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:54:40 +0000 https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1 en-US 30 hourly 2 7035d8602c491f80fe049e76ef4151b9 Nat R replied to the topic Overseas Financing: 1% - 3% interest? in the forum Overseas Deals https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384129-overseas-financing-1-3-interest/#post-4540345 Mon, 02 Jun 2008 23:07:18 +0000 Ring Westpac….they will be happy to talk to you about foreign currency loans given they have just finished the 18 year court case stemming from the last batch they did.  The exchange rate risk is huge and the 3% saving you make on your interest rate can look like peanuts compared to how much you can lose on a currency move. With the A$ at a 24…[Read more]

]]> 7a4f447552de2ea3a1e50ab7bffa1cb4 Nat R replied to the topic Telstra vs ACN in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4376675-telstra-vs-acn/page/2/#post-4494045 Mon, 02 Jun 2008 22:58:04 +0000 RVP…thank you for your honesty and frankness about your situation.I agree there is nothing really wrong with multi level marketing (how does any wholesale/retail/consumer market work) but I hate clowns who come on forums pretending to be a happy customer of some seminar/broker/whatever when they are really a cog in the wheel who thinks they can…[Read more]

]]> f024388888321c26a29ce8e6441620b3 Nat R replied to the topic Telstra vs ACN in the forum Update.....keep in mind Geo https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4376675-telstra-vs-acn/page/2/#post-4494043 Mon, 02 Jun 2008 13:18:55 +0000 Update…..keep in mind Geo was keen to point out this was not a pyramid scheme. It is in fact a multi level marketing scheme. :)Anyone got a Derivex update to throw in as well>???http://www.crimes-of-persuasion.com/Crimes/Delivered/ACN/ACN%20MLM.htm

]]> 6198c9f1ee97387fbc5e9ac236d39e83 Nat R replied to the topic Derivex in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4388278-derivex-4/#post-4561467 Mon, 05 Feb 2007 06:36:45 +0000 Yes many many people were believers and quit their day jobs to jump on this flawed from the outset bandwagon (scam)

Funny thing was I tried my heart out to expalain (using maths and logic) how this was not possible and all I got was BS replies like “they also said man would never walk on the moon”

Glad to see these clowns go down…I wish ASIC…[Read more]

]]> f43fd5a21bf695bed16d492706734cbd Nat R replied to the topic Non bank Lenders Good or Bad? in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385952-non-bank-lenders-good-or-bad/#post-4550746 Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:51:04 +0000 Most of the banks securitise a whack of their loans as well…so the MI issue is not limited to non bank lenders.

As for first mac…they seem to be easy to deal with from the point of view that they will approve just about anything.

]]> fc29cbb609ddb22a0fcd8ff6f3d632fb Nat R replied to the topic Westpac and Defence Force Housing in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384967-westpac-and-defence-force-housing/page/3/#post-4544811 Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:54:42 +0000 Thought so:
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,18073906%255E25658,00.html

I think you all give Westpac far too much credit for being smart…….don’t forget that they were mere days away from going broke in the late 80’s.

As for their negotiation skills….don’t kid yourself…anyone smart left the big 4 bansk years…[Read more]

]]> f6874ca360f06fd9084bee0c56d71282 Nat R replied to the topic Westpac and Defence Force Housing in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384967-westpac-and-defence-force-housing/page/3/#post-4544810 Wed, 05 Apr 2006 11:41:26 +0000 Originally posted by dohicky:
Hi Guys,
You can not purchase Westpac head office becuase they own it…

IIRC your head office (Our Great Place) is in fact owned by a property trust and not by Westpac itself …and therefore people can buy it….or at least units in the trust.

]]> 3c5b349fc0f9536e338dc27e4fc75625 Nat R replied to the topic Westpac and Defence Force Housing in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384967-westpac-and-defence-force-housing/page/2/#post-4544793 Wed, 05 Apr 2006 02:39:33 +0000 This deal has been hawked around the investment banks and fund managers in one form or another for the best part of 15 years.

I suprised Westpac put their hand up for it….I guess in all honesty they are using other people’s money :)

Steve …when you say it’s Australia’s first REIT…do you really think its any different to a normal property…[Read more]

]]> e06aeca7d066e1af0f5ee81287af2d6f Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/page/2/#post-4541609 Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:18:24 +0000 Mr Gross….Ithanks for your reply….but i’m sorry i can’t really get your point…can you clarify please

]]> 1d0a602bd8332fa4bb7774ac6295cbfe Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/page/2/#post-4541605 Mon, 06 Mar 2006 16:03:56 +0000 Bryce ….my comments were directed at your post higher up, which you have to agree didn’t make a whole lot of sense, and not at your choice of profession.

Everyone has a job to do but it irks me when know-nothings like the guys I described try to pull the wool over people’s eyes with throwaway lines.

As for insulting bankers….I’m an…[Read more]

]]> c7658ebe15add84b92e041a3f54035c8 Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/page/2/#post-4541602 Mon, 06 Mar 2006 12:17:51 +0000 Bryce…is your post intentionally meaningless or is there a deeper message in what is an otherwise pointless post??

Stuart…no offence intended but even you must have been amazed and shocked as to how gullible the industry was on this point. I thought everybody in the finance industry had at least a rough understanding of the concepts of…[Read more]

]]> bdcccab6cdae671cbde08e0ee8b85869 Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/#post-4541598 Mon, 06 Mar 2006 11:37:37 +0000 Mortageg Hunter….What really sh!ts me is that when this was going down and I was trying hard to warn people about it using maths and other “black magic” stuff that was beyond the comprehension of many of the forumites (you being one of them), I was shot down with bullsh1t comments like “people said man would never walk on the moon” and “there…[Read more]

]]> c02a0e2d0936b2cf0ec9cfc7b49b66e0 Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/#post-4541596 Mon, 06 Mar 2006 08:05:07 +0000 Whatever…all I know is that Derivex was a joke (an unfunny one at that) and way way too many people on here who claim they know what they are talking about took it hook line and sinker.

]]> d172200befb4faadf3ba5ac4cb81aa4a Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/#post-4541594 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 03:20:07 +0000 bugger…wrong link

try this one

http://www.smh.com.au/news/money/into-the-void/2006/02/27/1141007311264.html

]]> 566d8f9a056a01b09c4a7f1104b1cb8c Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/#post-4541592 Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:08:08 +0000 wonder why people have no faith in the regulators…read in particular the fact that ASIC is still in court with Westpoint arguing if they have the power to investigate the company !!!!

http://www.smh.com.au/news/money/a-lender-be–and-still-sleep-easy/2006/02/24/1140670263179.html

]]> 8eabde03ce771a2de2d99d2f4d01b871 Nat R replied to the topic Power of ASIC? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384402-power-of-asic/#post-4541587 Thu, 23 Feb 2006 05:01:48 +0000 Dazzling

I have worked in big end of town banking / finance for 18 years and to be honest things just don’t work like that.

I think you will find that AISC pushed that guy for more information and he flatly refused to give them anything or even respond with sensible answers (I doubt he had anything to give) and they did the right thing and shut…[Read more]

]]> 03b1fe948796049d01540e541206eb89 Nat R replied to the topic snowballing -how to do it? in the forum Help Needed! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4383591-snowballing-how-to-do-it/#post-4537558 Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:26:02 +0000 Here is a definition of snowballing:
http://snowballing.urbanup.com/127100

]]> 52d2f3921cb9411990404001494e399e Nat R replied to the topic wizard finance in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382820-wizard-finance-2/#post-4533376 Mon, 24 Oct 2005 04:06:04 +0000 The borrower may only see LMI being charged if the LVR exceeds 80% but there is a very good chance that Wizard buy LMI for all loans to help in the securitisation process , regardless of LVR

]]> 8a18855694ccec3ccbde3a7994096405 Nat R replied to the topic STEVE let get some balance in the forum Creative Investing https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382655-steve-let-get-some-balance/#post-4532331 Thu, 13 Oct 2005 11:22:59 +0000 Originally posted by grossrealisation:
hi Dannyboy
steve has rung me and after our little chat I have open my little challenge to anyone.and lets see he has explained his position in this mentoring process and will see if the money spent is worth it or not by the responces of the mentorees

here to help

I have read some of your other posts…[Read more]

]]> 127d42f5cec9ee4d48277c841cf60593 Nat R replied to the topic Derivex in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382554-derivex-3/#post-4531695 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:42:03 +0000 Originally posted by grossrealisation:
Hi Nat R
any thing to do with asic I stay well away from as they have they deepest pockets of any dept and it does make interesting reading put I sit on the fence on these types of hicups and as I post to another some time ago you must make sure what you post or email can not be taken the wrong way by a suit…[Read more]

]]> f5dab3b4a9ec10d0d3f5044254d0548e Nat R replied to the topic Derivex in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382554-derivex-3/#post-4531692 Wed, 05 Oct 2005 22:47:52 +0000 Just too funny :)

The claims about the loss of the master licence and the inabilty to sell sub licences speak volumes about what the Derivex business was all about.

I’m sure ASIC and MIAA are very happy to have this continula slandering of their name…I guess the fact it is coming from somebody with absolutly zero credability means nobody pays…[Read more]

]]> 38acfd503d81bf4823372b631f578b93 Nat R replied to the topic Interest as income? in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378207-interest-as-income/#post-4503463 Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:23:43 +0000 Too true…but funnily enough ING offers one of the highest rates and is also has the highest rating of any bank in Australia….higher than any of the big four.

]]> adb9d0b9ef10b58427412edaf4f0da38 Nat R replied to the topic Interest as income? in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378207-interest-as-income/#post-4503461 Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:18:58 +0000 Further to the Fincorp story….look for more ASIC investigations into debentures issuers going forward

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/05-290+Fincorp+to+offer+millions+in+refunds+to+debenture+investors?openDocument

]]> d4729de9a1b255cc4bb30df997704fa6 Nat R replied to the topic I/O payments on $100,000 in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382233-io-payments-on-100000/#post-4529681 Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:15:44 +0000 If you are only paying interest it doesn’t matter if you take the loan over 1 year or 100 years ….the repayments stay the same.

$100,000 x 0.066 = yearly repayment ….then divide by 12 to get monthly, by 52 to get weekly :)

]]> 72ffbeb72ebce2bf97a2591107c13f2c Nat R replied to the topic STITCHED UP BY INTERSTAR in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382171-stitched-up-by-interstar/#post-4529153 Tue, 13 Sep 2005 07:36:44 +0000 When you say “friend” do you really mean “client” that you can’t get set through your broking business that is linked via the “www” button on your profile?

]]> 83f5ed0c73455310c54839ba420f3707 Nat R replied to the topic Westpac Cuts Fixed Rates in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382124-westpac-cuts-fixed-rates/#post-4528893 Mon, 12 Sep 2005 03:40:24 +0000 Best place to find more info is to read a couple of the Pre Sales Reprost on the Standard and Poors Website.

Note: if a bank issues a bond in its own name then the investors lose out if it goes bad. But if the same bank issues a Mortgaged Backed Bond then the investors are subject to the credit worthiness of the individual loans and the people…[Read more]

]]> bd2b3ad36808ced8c947f80a9c66fd8b Nat R replied to the topic STITCHED UP BY INTERSTAR in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382171-stitched-up-by-interstar/#post-4529149 Mon, 12 Sep 2005 02:18:41 +0000 Has your friend tried this group:

http://www.homesec.com.au/

Their website is vague and their interest rates look to be very high but they were recommended to me by a fellow forumite …so they must be OK.

]]> 886fc6c3f9bf25499b2305f8a27b485c Nat R replied to the topic Jamie McIntyre in the forum Heads Up! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381579-jamie-mcintyre-3/page/2/#post-4525581 Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:36:26 +0000 All advertisments for Guru courses seem to depict people walking along the beach talking on telephones…I always assumed this was becasue they had lost thier house due to margin calls and were sleeping in the dunes.

]]> cf51ac4865f5a2ea8e8c76c56d2230e3 Nat R replied to the topic Westpac Cuts Fixed Rates in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382124-westpac-cuts-fixed-rates/#post-4528889 Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:26:10 +0000 Its all about the interbank interest rate swap market…nothing more nothing less.(plus a little bit of margin give up on westpac’s part)

There is a traded market between the banks where they can “swap” fixed rate exposure for floating rate exposure.

They all issue floating rate debt to fund truck loads of thier mortgage to the big super funds…[Read more]

]]> ddc32301acaa9b7118daa6caa6b98340 Nat R replied to the topic US Finance in the forum Finance https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382035-us-finance/#post-4528505 Thu, 08 Sep 2005 23:18:39 +0000 Originally posted by grossrealisation:
hi Qlds007
It doesn’t surprise me its not just the banks.
I sent a spread sheet to mcdonalds head office in dallas and asked them to burn a cd disk with what I wanted and send it back to me.
They sent me the chair, air freight 10 days because nobody had a cd burner, when it arrived I couldn’t stop…[Read more]

]]> 67009599c03f365fe8fb45c7f118f72d Nat R replied to the topic Agents acting in the interests of their vendor in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381949-agents-acting-in-the-interests-of-their-vendor/page/2/#post-4527969 Wed, 07 Sep 2005 22:53:51 +0000 Originally posted by munjy:
Maybe I am being naive.

However, getting a better price for your vendor, even if it means a delay of a phone call to a competeing bidder, means more commission for your agency and also for you.

I would agree …you are being naive….if an agent gets an extra $5000 on a sale that is at best an extra $100 in commision…[Read more]

]]> fc12fbb45750f464bf1e60a0d2a4eb48 Nat R replied to the topic pipsinc.com- MASSIVE PROFITS in the forum Help Needed! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380793-pipsinc-com-massive-profits/#post-4520288 Tue, 06 Sep 2005 02:40:37 +0000 Recurring theme….when things don’t add it’s usually because they don’t.

http://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic_pub.nsf/byheadline/05-264+‘PIPS’+%28People+in+Profit+System%29%3A+Investigation+in+Malaysia?openDocument

]]> 34f04564e67591df9a15b670a85fe606 Nat R replied to the topic CRASH!!!! in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381838-crash/page/2/#post-4527270 Mon, 05 Sep 2005 04:44:45 +0000 10% is not a crash…nowhere does the bloke from JP Morgan use the term…so please don’t misquote again.

Keep inmind that is less than 6mths gain in some recent years.

As for the comments from the white shoe real estate agents…who cares what some two-bit salesman says when all he is after is headline exposure.

]]> 9a0939dba8f44383bdbd5086c6fa1a77 Nat R replied to the topic CRASH!!!! in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381838-crash/page/2/#post-4527268 Wed, 31 Aug 2005 07:07:23 +0000 Every day I read economic research from the major Investment Banks (Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, UBS etc) and there is a big focus on the property market given the number of securitised loans in the money market.

Without expception there are no concerns of a property market crash in any of the global markets.

]]> ce19d339b12075dc8c8d76cd273ba673 Nat R replied to the topic Agents acting in the interests of their vendor in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381949-agents-acting-in-the-interests-of-their-vendor/#post-4527950 Wed, 31 Aug 2005 02:07:17 +0000 They only want the sale….getting another $10,00 for the vendor hardly makes any difference to the commision the earn. Sometimes its not even worth making the extra phone calls.

]]> c3be85d1f18694c6e985477c164977b1 Nat R replied to the topic Agents acting in the interests of their vendor in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381949-agents-acting-in-the-interests-of-their-vendor/#post-4527945 Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:11:18 +0000 Drop a note in the letter box of the house so the vendor knows what a sh1t job the agent has done….I had the same problem a few years back so I dobbed in the agent via a note to the vendor.

A few days later I bumped into the agent in the supermarket and she went mental at me….looks like my note worked …and I got the result I was after !!!

]]> c3520f917ceb540b055327899827ceea Nat R replied to the topic Money or a Life? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381851-money-or-a-life/#post-4527359 Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:54:51 +0000 Make that 29,000 again ;)

]]> 34c55e4906d3a16db7bd246918dbf1a7 Nat R replied to the topic Money or a Life? in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381851-money-or-a-life/#post-4527357 Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:07:55 +0000 Originally posted by kay henry:

I also read tonight (big reading night!) that John Brogden says he will axe 29,000 public service positions if he gets into power in NSW-

kay henry

Did he count himself in that number ?

]]> e45d66ab72d14a4c4fe57b6625075540 Nat R replied to the topic Quizz - LVR percentage- R U COMFY? in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381861-quizz-lvr-percentage-r-u-comfy/#post-4527437 Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:00:43 +0000 So many “what ifs” ….what if there is no crash , what if you don’t lose your job, what if you don’t haev to sell.

While ever I have the ability to work I can service the loans and all is cool. I would hate to get to 90 years old and realise that I should have borrowed more through out mylife….its not like you get a seceond chance.

I would…[Read more]

]]> 5464b313118e74f113d12603455fe596 Nat R replied to the topic Quizz - LVR percentage- R U COMFY? in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381861-quizz-lvr-percentage-r-u-comfy/#post-4527433 Fri, 26 Aug 2005 02:43:34 +0000 Have been as high as 110% currently at 45% …moving to 85% soon.

To be honest I don’t see why it is relevent….debt service ratio is the one that you need to focus on.

]]> b3c09f6fcbc44d98fa45897d00838283 Nat R replied to the topic Wrapper required in the forum Creative Investing https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381753-wrapper-required/#post-4526717 Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:51:26 +0000 Originally posted by siacci:

Furher to the comment by “Nat R”, you should not read and reply to posts that require the skills and brains required to make an educated and informed comment ouside your area of comfort. Not all people can get a home loan at the same time they want a home. It is not always as simple as “Go get a loan for 106%”. There…[Read more]

]]> 812c3b9d0b4913e6873bba8de1eb06b7 Nat R replied to the topic RE GURUS and ASIC etc.. in the forum Opinionated! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381870-re-gurus-and-asic-etc/#post-4527490 Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:02:55 +0000 I have a simple rule that has never let me down.

I simply don’t believe anything a real estate agent tells me. I only make decisions based on information that I have verified independantly.

I’m saying they lie …..I just can’t recall a single piece of information that an agent has given me that has turned out to be true. :)

]]> 80656314e7e9619c864c64725ec11aec Nat R replied to the topic Collins Street Tower, 480 Collins St, Melbourne in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381818-collins-street-tower-480-collins-st-melbourne/#post-4527123 Tue, 23 Aug 2005 22:39:03 +0000 Think about who is guaranteing the 5.5% yield…its probably a $2 shelf company that can disappear overnight.

How do you think they can afford to make this claim…by loading up the sale price!!

]]> 4b3db25a8b281c6fa39053ab0559b311 Nat R replied to the topic Inverell - NSW in the forum General Property https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381817-inverell-nsw/#post-4527117 Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:22:29 +0000 A few years back we had to sell a relatives house in Inverell.

It took 2 years to get a single bid on it and during that time 3 people came through for a look. We ended up getting low $60’s for it.

The house was in very good condition and well positioned. Keep in mind this was 4 or so years back and things may have picked up.

Its a very pretty town !!!

]]> a514913d0256c3e760bcf462cf43b83e Nat R replied to the topic Wrapper required in the forum Creative Investing https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381753-wrapper-required/#post-4526714 Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:25:52 +0000 Why not borrow 100% or 106% and buy a house outright?

Why give some bottom feeding wrapper a head start?

]]> 2c4942dfce6a93a82c01165fbc20eca4 Nat R replied to the topic Jamie McIntyre in the forum Heads Up! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381579-jamie-mcintyre-3/page/2/#post-4525577 Fri, 19 Aug 2005 01:41:14 +0000 Believenothing….your point is what?

If you were trying to make a humourous jibe you failed miserably if you were trying to insult us you also failed misearby….I guess you are just a failure.

Please feel free to correct me if you wish….remember also that a short post is a good post….we don’t need to read your long winded sh!t that goes…[Read more]

]]> f253ce39e87c837ef90a74438ae575b4 Nat R replied to the topic Suburb Capital Growth. in the forum No Subject https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381693-suburb-capital-growth/#post-4526281 Tue, 16 Aug 2005 04:37:24 +0000 http://www.domain.com.au

has full profile and price data for suburbs for free !!!

]]> 6334fd35f8c4cc9ecfc26e0e7ddf661e Nat R replied to the topic Jamie McIntyre in the forum Heads Up! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381579-jamie-mcintyre-3/page/2/#post-4525572 Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:10:49 +0000 WanyeL: Excelent advice…anyone who thinks they can stay alive in the options market without knowing both the full theoretical and practical side of options will go down in flames very very quickly.

The problem is most of the people who swear by these guru course suffer from 2nd degree ignorance….i.e. they are not even aware of what they don’t…[Read more]

]]> 9f5d0767a715be2b2124702d5923ed54 Nat R replied to the topic Jamie McIntyre in the forum Heads Up! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381579-jamie-mcintyre-3/#post-4525563 Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:28:17 +0000 “If” I had my own website and “if” I was going to make some nebulus referece to Robert Kiyosaki I would probably go to the trouble of spelling his name correctly….but I’m not a self-professed guru so it doens’t really matter.

I must say however, having 14 different websites all drowning in cliches with stacks of file photos of big houses,…[Read more]

]]> b3aba8dcc1374c739efe92578413a721 Nat R replied to the topic Jamie McIntyre in the forum Heads Up! https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381579-jamie-mcintyre-3/#post-4525561 Thu, 11 Aug 2005 22:58:24 +0000 Keep in mind that its not just a matter of sitting for a test at ASIC. There are a raft of ongoing compliance and reporting issues and a need to maintain a minimum capital balance within the company.

From what I have seen, most of the gurus around town would not be able to meet the hurdles set by ASIC, either on day 1 or going forward.

]]>