All Topics / Legal & Accounting / Foreign settlor – Family Trust

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)
  • Profile photo of MercaMerca
    Member
    @merca
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    I need some advice on creating a family trust to hold residential property.

    Is it possible for a non-resident to settle/create a family trust in Australia? 

    The settlor would be a foreign trust (no links to Australia) and would introduce assets (funds) to the Australian trust, which would purchase local property, and whose beneficiaries would be mainly Australian residents.

    Would the settlor have to be in Australia to sign the deed of trust?  Any tax implications for the settlor?

    Many thanks
    Merca

    Profile photo of Dan42Dan42
    Member
    @dan42
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 619

    The settlor is usually a 'natural person', rather than a trust, and is independent to the trustee. The settlor can not be a beneficiary of the trust, they usually hand over an amount to set up, or settle the trust, then disappear.

    There are no tax implications for acting as the settlor.

    The settlor would need to sign the trust deed to set up the trust, then they can go wherever they like!

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    The settlor has to be a person – natural or company. I think a settlor can be a beneficiary, but this will introduce tax problems. But I have never looked into this – although i did see one client who had his son as settlor for some reason.

    Why create the uncertainty? Just set up the deed here and get joe blow to be settlor – someone who you will never want to distribute to.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Terryw wrote:
    The settlor has to be a person – natural or company. I think a settlor can be a beneficiary, but this will introduce tax problems. But I have never looked into this – although i did see one client who had his son as settlor for some reason.

    Why create the uncertainty? Just set up the deed here and get joe blow to be settlor – someone who you will never want to distribute to.

    Dan

    The tax consequences for allowing a settlor to be a beneficiary are covered under s102 ITAA 1936.
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1936240/s102.html

    I think this basically boils down to if the settler can benefit under the trust then the income of the trust could be taxed at the top rate of the settlor.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of MercaMerca
    Member
    @merca
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    Thanks for the input.

    The 'owner' of the assets (presently held in cash)  is a foreign trust. Would the trustee be able to settle an Australian trust with these assets? Would he have to be present in Australia to sign the trust deed? This overseas trustee would have no further connection with the new trust, neither as beneficiary nor as trustee, so there should be no tax implications for him.

    Surely if a Joe Blow is found to act as local settlor, there would be a question as to where he acquired the assets with which to settle a new trust, or am I missing something?

    Merca

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You would just settle $10 usually. Otherwise you would pay stamp duty on the whole amount settled.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Rob G.Rob G.
    Participant
    @rob-g.
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 70
    Merca wrote:

    The 'owner' of the assets (presently held in cash)  is a foreign trust. Would the trustee be able to settle an Australian trust with these assets?

    A trustee is not an 'owner', therefore they may not gift the property although they may be able to settle under instruction of a beneficiary.

    However that beneficiary must have a sufficient interest in the property under the o/s trust deed to enable them to give direction.

    Cheers,

    Rob

    Profile photo of MercaMerca
    Member
    @merca
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    So if I understand correctly, it should be something like this :

    Joe Blow settles the trust locally with $10. There are only local beneficiaries.  The overseas trust still has the cash funds.

    How would the overseas trust introduce funds into to the local trust – by way of a loan? I guess any other method (donation?) would have tax implications for the local trust?

    Could the local trust pay interest on this loan, with a tax deduction? The o/s trust would be taxed then in Australia on interest income?

    Thanks again for the feedback.

    Merca

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    You could have foreign beneficiaries. Nothing wrong with that, Just consider the tax consequence as non residents pay higher taxes.

    The overseas trust could loan or gift to Australian trust. No real tax consequences on gifts. If a loan and you want to pay interest there will be tax issues. The trustee may have to withhold tax or the interest may not be claimable if you control the overseas trust and the ATO considers it your money – especially if the trust is located in a tax haven.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of MercaMerca
    Member
    @merca
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    Terryw

    If the overseas trust gifts the funds to the local trust, is this not income to the trust and accordingly taxable in Australia?

    Regards
    Merca

    Profile photo of Rob G.Rob G.
    Participant
    @rob-g.
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 70
    Merca wrote:
    Terryw

    If the overseas trust gifts the funds to the local trust, is this not income to the trust and accordingly taxable in Australia?

    Regards
    Merca

    Genuine gifts are not taxed in Australia, but there may be gift duty in the country of residence.

    If you make the local trust a beneficiary of a foreign trust then there is a lot more to consider.

    You still haven't explained how the o/s trustee will 'gift' what is not their's to deal with.

    Its the way you do it that matters.

    Cheers,

    Rob

    Profile photo of MercaMerca
    Member
    @merca
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    I should have provided all the background details at the start :

    Funds have accumulated in the overseas trust, over a period of 10 years. Its a discretionary trust, in a tax haven, so is not subject to any taxes on income or distribution. No party to the trust has had any connection with Australia, and the trust income also has no link to Australia. But its possible that one of the beneficiaries ('Joe") will settle in Australia in the next year or two. He has a resident visa, and already directly owns one rental property in Australia, and so pays tax in Australia on the rental income, as a non-tax resident taxpayer.

    If Joe wanted to set up a property owning trust in Australia in advance of his arrival, what would be the  appropriate method of getting funds out of the overseas trust and into the local property trust, in a legal and tax effective way?  If Joe received a distribution from the trust before coming to Australia, he would be taxed in his current country of residence – obviously he wishes to avoid/minimise that as far as possible.

    The overseas trustee can specify additional beneficiaries, so the local trust could become a beneficiary, or he could lend the funds to the local trust, or to Joe.

    Any ideas? Your advice will probably be to consult a tax lawyer – it seems to be quite a complex issue…..

    Another question :

    If it is usual in Australia to settle the trust with only $10, using a Joe Blow, in order to reduce stamp duty, how are the remaining assets introduced into the trustee's control? A loan from the holder of the funds, or does he gift it to the trust?

    Merca

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    This is a complex question.

    Once Joe becomes a resident here for tax purposes he would have to declare his interest in the trust over there and would probably have to pay tax on the income of the trust even though it is overseas. He needs good advice.

    To start off here Joe could get a loan from the os trust or a gift – but again he will need advice as the ATO has introduced complex rules regarding trusts. He could find himself taxed on the loan as if it is income if not planned properly.

    In Australia you must pay stamp duty on land transferred into a Trust, in all states I think. Shares no longer have stamp duty problems, but transferring shares may cause CGT to be payable by the transferor. If you want to introduce cash to the trust you can do so as a gift or a loan = each with different consequences for asset protection

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Rob G.Rob G.
    Participant
    @rob-g.
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 70

    Still not enough detail to even start.

    If your friend is a resident of an OECD country then they most likely should have been on statutory accruals, in other words taxed on trust income even though no distribution made. In which case this is a non-assessable distribution.

    Otherwise, it depends on the tax rules in the o/s country, Australia and any double tax agreement as to how this should be done.

    One strategy is to exploit timing differences between loss of residence of the o/s country and acquiring residence in Australia whilst making the distribution in transit.

    So you need a specialist law firm that has contacts in the o/s country as well to exploit three sets of laws !!

    Cheers,

    Rob

    Profile photo of Dan42Dan42
    Member
    @dan42
    Join Date: 2008
    Post Count: 619
    Merca wrote:
    If it is usual in Australia to settle the trust with only $10, using a Joe Blow, in order to reduce stamp duty, how are the remaining assets introduced into the trustee's control? A loan from the holder of the funds, or does he gift it to the trust?

    Merca

    Yes, it is very common. Most trusts are now non-revocable trusts, and the settlor can not be a beneficiary.
    Funds are generally loaned to the trust, and are deemed to be available on a 'at-call' basis. Generally interest is not paid, as the loaner of the funds doesn't want the extra income. They are generally setting up a trust to help minimise tax, so the interest is generally not charged.

    Profile photo of MercaMerca
    Member
    @merca
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 6

    What about changing the domicile (don't know the correct term) of the o/s trust to Australia from the o/s country? That's effectively the objective – allow existing trust funds to be used to invest in Australian property, without first distributing them and then re-settling them in a new trust, during which process there seems to be tax/legal issues.  The trust deed does provide for 'changing the law of the trust to another jurisdiction'.

    Otherwise the idea of an "in-transit" distribution to Joe seems the best option.

    Always good to have some general background  knowledge before approaching a lawyer, so all the contributions here are much appreciated.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I don't know about that. That could still possibly trigger stamp duty on the assets of the trust and possibly CGT if it is considered a resettlement. You would need an expert trust lawyer to advise.

    Why not just leave the funds there and have the o/s trust loan funds to the australian trust? That would probably be safer from an asset protection POV and possibly tax – though being a tax haven would mean you have to be careful.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Rob G.Rob G.
    Participant
    @rob-g.
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 70
    Merca wrote:

    What about changing the domicile (don't know the correct term) of the o/s trust to Australia from the o/s country? That's effectively the objective – allow existing trust funds to be used to invest in Australian property, without first distributing them and then re-settling them in a new trust, during which process there seems to be tax/legal issues.  The trust deed does provide for 'changing the law of the trust to another jurisdiction'.

    A trustee becoming a resident, or the central management & control shifting to Australia will make the trust a resident.

    It might be better to settle a new tust with a customised deed for Australian conditions.

    Cheers,

    Rob

Viewing 18 posts - 1 through 18 (of 18 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.