All Topics / Finance / 95% or 80% loan ?

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Profile photo of PropertInvestorPropertInvestor
    Participant
    @propertinvestor
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 35

    G'Day !

    Please share your experience

    What most of the people use 95% + LMI or 80% loan ? and Why ?

    I am planning to get 95% + LMI for less deposit. Pros and cons pls.

    Edit: YI, I edited my post.

    Profile photo of YoungInvestorYoungInvestor
    Participant
    @younginvestor
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 377

    Hi there,

    I might be missing something, but how does 95% reduce the monthly repayment?

    Profile photo of PaddyomallPaddyomall
    Member
    @paddyomall
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 16

    I would also like some advice here, I understand that you are increasing the possibility of negative equity in the short term but as long as you are able to service the debt then wouldn't you be shortening your time in between purchases by looking at 95% + LMI.

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes Paddy. You would be saving your deposits to enable u to spread them out more.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Ryan McLeanRyan McLean
    Participant
    @ryan-mclean
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 547

    You just have to be careful with gearing your properties to the hilt. The main risk you then face is rising interest rates. It is hard to be positively cashflowed at 95% (possible but hard). How many interest rate rises can you handle before going negative? This would be something to look at.

    Also, banks are still pretty tight with their lending. They don’t offer Lender’s Insurance in some places (like rural towns under a certain population). So make sure you find that out.

    But if the numbers work out then I am all for it. The more properties you buy the more growth you will experience.

    If you do buy at 95% LVR I recommend you aim to get your properties to 80% LVR. This protects you in the future from unforseen circumstances, but still lets you use lots of leverage to get a great ROI.

    Ryan McLean
    http://CashFlowInvestor.com.au
    Positive Cashflow Properties Are Just A Click Away

    Ryan McLean | On Property
    http://onproperty.com.au
    Email Me

    Profile photo of PaddyomallPaddyomall
    Member
    @paddyomall
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 16

    Thanks guys, I do agree with you Ryan to aim for 80% or lower to ensure a positive return but at this stage I am 23 and working full time so I would prefer the properties to run slightly negative if it allows me to obtain more sooner and look to lowering the debt %'s a bit later when life becomes a bit more uncertain and I would benefit more from the added security.

    Profile photo of PropertInvestorPropertInvestor
    Participant
    @propertinvestor
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 35
    ryan mclean wrote:
    If you do buy at 95% LVR I recommend you aim to get your properties to 80% LVR. This protects you in the future from unforseen circumstances

    Ryan, Thanks for reply.

    How about taking 95%+LMI if bank approves and putting 15% (95-80) or backup money in offset a/c for unforseen circumstances as well as handy cash? Thoughts Pls !

    Also, what I understand is if I take 95% loan then mortgage insurance is extra expense but if I take 80% then no need for mortgage insurance ? Suggestion Pls !

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.