All Topics / Legal & Accounting / The best of both worlds

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Profile photo of carl_viccarl_vic
    Participant
    @carl_vic
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 73

    I was talking to somebody the other day who mentioned the following scenario:

    Married couple, husband earns good dollars, wife has no income. They buy a negatively geared property in a HDT, a loan is taken out to buy units in the trust the normal way. However, instead of the husband taking out the loan (because he has the higher income), the loan is taken out as tennants-in-common. Apparently by doing this there is a way to legally claim the majority (or all) of the interest deductions on the husband’s tax bracket, and yet claim a disproportionate amount of the income after depreciations and expenses (perhaps all of it) on the wife’s tax bracket.

    This concept was supposedly presented by a representative of an accounting firm specialising in the use of HDTs.

    I’m sure I’ll get some interesting comments from this…

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I haven’t heard of this before, do you have any further info, name of firm etc?

    Terryw
    Discover Home Loans
    North Sydney
    [email protected]

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of carl_viccarl_vic
    Participant
    @carl_vic
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 73

    I can’t remember the name of the firm (it was a Melbourne firm). I’ll see if I can find out.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.