<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | PLC | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/plc/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/plc/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for PLC.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 22:24:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">01c665e39643ad72aa2503c2cb04a05c</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Lenders tighten serviceability screws again in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5017119-lenders-tighten-serviceability-screws-again/#post-5018392</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:36:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I haven&#8217;t used NAB Broker for a while but the way I read their policy, the external debt is still assessed the same as before, and it&#8217;s only proposed new borrowings that are affected by the new servicing calculation based on remaining P&amp;I term (confusing I know). The new serviceability calculator still adds a loading of 28% to existing&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-332735"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5017119-lenders-tighten-serviceability-screws-again/#post-5018392" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca3bb91debbb446d69d5cc922959268c</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Lenders tighten serviceability screws again in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5017119-lenders-tighten-serviceability-screws-again/#post-5018392</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2015 13:36:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, I haven&#8217;t used NAB Broker for a while but the way I read their policy, the external debt is still assessed the same as before, and it&#8217;s only proposed new borrowings that are affected by the new servicing calculation based on remaining P&amp;I term. The new serviceability calculator still adds a loading of 28% to existing debt so it seems it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-332734"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5017119-lenders-tighten-serviceability-screws-again/#post-5018392" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">787be3345c0fc2711810fbbf06574c13</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic LMI and deposit in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5014132-lmi-and-deposit/#post-5014251</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:14:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is true, but those debts would need to be disclosed which reduces your borrowing capacity by a greater amount than borrowing it against another property. And the interest charged on those borrowings might actually mean that LMI could come out cheaper in the long run.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">18c5973e3990bb0c0c57f9fa23689fab</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic APRA imposing controls on &#34;investors only&#34; in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5007424-apra-imposing-controlds-on-investors-only/#post-5007979</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 03:22:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. ANZ and NAB have said that they are no longer offering discretionary pricing, but CBA and Westpac have &#8220;reduced&#8221; their investor discounts which seems to suggest they are still offering them in some format.</p>
<p>I just had extra discount approved for a Westpac investor deal, albeit being to renew a pricing discretion that had expired a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-316076"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5007424-apra-imposing-controlds-on-investors-only/#post-5007979" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">280557a9e635fc2ee2f15de016940430</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Depreciation is only available for NEW Home and Land Package?  in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5007676-depreciation-is-only-available-for-new-home-and-land-package/#post-5007768</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2015 14:58:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct, when they&#8217;re suggesting property for you, you can be assured they will be receiving a commission for it that is added in the price. The effect that will most likely have is your valuation may tank.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">49482a7e515c9d925a13d9ff70c66a22</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic who is the best mortgage broker out there ? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5007252-who-is-the-best-mortgage-broker-out-there/#post-5007340</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 14:50:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horses for courses. An online lender may work well for you, it may not. </p>
<p>Until you delve more into your personal scenario and go through your goals, you really won&#8217;t be able to tell.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1fac0a9b02b1bf7e69114ad8aba2501e</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Risks of higher LVR&#039;s in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5006382-risks-of-higher-lvrs/#post-5006524</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 14:27:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the higher the interest, the higher the deductions against the income of the owners on title.</p>
<p>IP should definitely be all I/O, especially as you&#8217;re thinking of a PPOR down the track. </p>
<p>Fixed can be good if you&#8217;re looking at a set and forget type loan, or for when cashflow might be a bit tight and you would like to know your repayments for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-313362"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5006382-risks-of-higher-lvrs/#post-5006524" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cf9c245569fabeef8f0b0139e91c1719</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Risks of higher LVR&#039;s in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5006382-risks-of-higher-lvrs/#post-5006387</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Borna,</p>
<p>As Richard suggests, you will have some extra costs involved with a high LVR purchase for an IP, however they are normally tax deductible .</p>
<p>With the plan you are suggesting, it can be most beneficial to have as minimal a deposit on your first IP as your risk profile allows. Coupled with the right structure it will allow you to maximise&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-313103"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5006382-risks-of-higher-lvrs/#post-5006387" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">408ff26b3aa34fa42e1eda023b33314d</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Structuring Finance in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5002658-structuring-finance-2/#post-5002726</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:17:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not really the case. Total aggregated lending will likewise get you better rates, even if it&#8217;s multiple splits.</p>
<p>As for the OP, take heed of Terry&#8217;s advice. It&#8217;s spot on.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1475c7fd123f1abf6813e092e9a2130b</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Mortgage Broker Fees in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5001238-mortgage-broker-fees/#post-5001887</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:13:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should have received a quote from the broker upfront advising their fees to you. If not, then what they are doing in charging you contravenes the NCCP Act.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89e4a8676bf094c90af11191c25130b3</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic car leasing Vs buying it outright , impact on borrowing capacity. in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4995779-car-leasing-vs-buying-it-outright-impact-on-borrowing-capacity/#post-4995798</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:30:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you are trying to salary sacrifice the car. This has its own advantages and pitfalls, and you should really see an accountant to make sure it is suitable for you.</p>
<p>As for the borrowing capacity, this all depends on how much your repayments are for the lease? That is dependent on the lease term, interest rate, etc. What that does is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-299916"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4995779-car-leasing-vs-buying-it-outright-impact-on-borrowing-capacity/#post-4995798" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfb4080c3fdcaf681865adf4d5a81ace</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic First IP loan structure in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407769-first-ip-loan-structure-2/page/2/#post-4994343</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:06:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As long as the new loan was to be used towards the new IP purchase then yes, it would be deductible. However as you have different loans everywhere, you need to ensure the whole loan structure is setup correctly if refinancing.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">feeac5ebc3baadd8874e2ec81d9103ce</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic First IP loan structure in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407769-first-ip-loan-structure-2/page/2/#post-4994337</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2014 14:22:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>If you are still going to live in your PPOR then that LOAN 2 is not going to be deductible. If you made it into an IP then it will. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re looking to buy another IP, what you can try dependent on equity position is take out a loan against either property to fund deposit + costs for new IP. That would be deductible.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-298232"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407769-first-ip-loan-structure-2/page/2/#post-4994337" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dac1994a459ebd2e64bea0ef2d0da633</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Convert PPOR to IP...Am I doing it right? in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4994089-convert-ppor-to-ip-am-i-doing-it-right/#post-4994167</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, do not redraw the $50K whatever you do. As soon as you redraw it, you contaminate the loan at the current moment in time.</p>
<p>There is the option of either you or your wife purchasing the other half of the property from the other (I think what Richard was referring to as an option). Doing this will allow you to increase the loan size and keep the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-297944"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4994089-convert-ppor-to-ip-am-i-doing-it-right/#post-4994167" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">955f60a6effebc8ced007d5b1d2b3d8a</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Convert PPOR to IP...Am I doing it right? in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4994089-convert-ppor-to-ip-am-i-doing-it-right/#post-4994118</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:43:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard is right on this. The maximum you can claim on the interest is $185K. The $50K won&#8217;t be deductible.</p>
<p>If you really want the $50K in funds, then it would need to be done as a separate split to make things clean.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fdf1d4192ec5f540b07c21865eac24b1</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic First Home Owner Loan Advice Needed! in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4993455-first-home-owner-loan-advide-needed/#post-4993465</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2014 09:18:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Generally FHOG isn&#8217;t classified as genuine savings by lenders and can&#8217;t be contributed towards the 5% deposit.</p>
<p>Have you rented somewhere with an agent for a long term period? Some lenders take this as qualifying for genuine savings and then you can use other funds to come up with the 5%? </p>
<p>Some lenders also do non-gen, savings at 95%LVR, but they&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-296907"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4993455-first-home-owner-loan-advide-needed/#post-4993465" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">733a58466fc094a928b051afe62a7517</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic IP to PPOR - Loan Structure in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4993374-ip-to-ppor-loan-structure/#post-4993384</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 15:02:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi bns, like Jamie I&#8217;m not quite understanding the question you have posed, however he is correct in saying that if you are looking to pull equity out of the existing property for the new PPOR purchase then it wont be deductible as the purpose of the loan will determine deductibility, not the security it is based against.</p>
<p>The loan structure from&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-296756"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4993374-ip-to-ppor-loan-structure/#post-4993384" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fb53f578c198a9f705cdc4ebce21bfba</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Be VERY careful who you listen to for advice on structuring/tax. in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4993377-be-very-careful-who-you-listen-to-for-advice-on-structuringtax/#post-4993383</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 14:38:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, if that is the advice the branch manager is giving, then I dare say he won&#8217;t be branch manager long.</p>
<p>Though I&#8217;m not surprised as bad advice like that is prevalent from both banking staff and/or brokers. Just need to weed the bad ones out when looking for a good one.</p>
<p>Good to hear you set them straight Solomon.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79641e9d02b40e6066de09cf4dfa7690</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Borrowing for first investment in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992919-borrowing-for-first-investment/#post-4992954</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:34:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with the others.</p>
<p>With the figures you have given, you have about $130K to play with in equity with your current property (before incurring LMI). However structuring this equity release is critical to give yourself the maximum deduction possible come tax time.</p>
<p>This is where a decent broker can be a enormous benefit.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">90eee534751632edf854529e78bb3914</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Equity transfer in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992129-equity-transfer/#post-4992254</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:22:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have mentioned, unfortunately the equity you pull out for a PPOR wont be deductible as purpose of the loan determines deductibility, not the security it&#8217;s based against.</p>
<p>You need to make sure the existing $250K loan and $100K equity loan are separate loans and not one mixed one otherwise that will create a mess. Also the IO as others&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-294957"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992129-equity-transfer/#post-4992254" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a53e959b8a2102b144c6b8de17e47c39</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Fixed Interest Rate in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992246-fixed-interest-rate/#post-4992252</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2014 15:11:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi magic,</p>
<p>Unfortunately it doesn&#8217;t work that way. Lenders still add a standard buffer to fixed rates for serviceability purposes (as these products revert back to a variable rate at the end of the fixed rate term).</p>
<p>Westpac and St George used to allow a buffer of only 0.5% on fixed rate products of 3 years or more, however they have stopped that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-294955"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992246-fixed-interest-rate/#post-4992252" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">372d9f6017d4a691cde9be12a3dd7a01</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic PPOR to IP: Intrst 100% tax deduc/offset by principal payments in previous loan in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992069-ppor-to-ip-intrst-100-tax-deducoffset-by-principal-payments-in-previous-loan/#post-4992107</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry is correct.</p>
<p>If say you had a $370K loan at the start and paid off $70K to make the balance $300K, the tax deductible amount would be the interest on the $300K when it turned into an IP. However this is only if you didn&#8217;t redraw any funds from the loan during the term. If you did, then as Terry alluded to, it is a bit of a mess and your&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-294682"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4992069-ppor-to-ip-intrst-100-tax-deducoffset-by-principal-payments-in-previous-loan/#post-4992107" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c10c20d0aa5cd293a302602c1bac1581</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Wasting Time in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4991985-wasting-time/#post-4992062</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 09:11:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a broker friend in a similar situation recently. He had a client with a complex scenario and in which he helped for a month discussing structures, etc. The client then took all this information and went to another broker to help him. The other broker then stuffed things up so the client came back asking for my broker friend to continue with&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-294599"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4991985-wasting-time/#post-4992062" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">49c39ff1003c9221253aae2e50467d91</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Cross Collateralizing in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4991057-cross-collateralizing-2/#post-4991162</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 02:03:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only meant it was the best thing for them as it only needed one application to submit, and not multiple. Basically they were lazy which is never a good thing for the client.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">41168fd2ef747941112ac6bda2cab1f5</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Leveraging Investment property to purchase first home in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4990691-leveraging-investment-property-to-purchase-first-home/page/2/#post-4991070</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 14:09:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m assuming that you are looking at tapping into the equity of your PPOR for the IP? In that case the separate splits are okay. However there is no need to access the full 80% ($240K) of the equity in your existing property. Should be just enough to complete deposit and closing costs and have the main loan against new property.</p>
<p>This is a no&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-292709"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4990691-leveraging-investment-property-to-purchase-first-home/page/2/#post-4991070" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2ced3e40f8e5209c18e7abd1b28f4073</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Leveraging Investment property to purchase first home in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4990691-leveraging-investment-property-to-purchase-first-home/page/2/#post-4991069</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, if your saving for a PPOR when you have an existing IP, then IO with offset is the way to go on the IP loan.</p>
<p>Any &#8220;principal&#8221; that would have been paid can be directed to the offset thereby reducing the interest to be paid which then leads to more funds being saved for that month. Then rinse and repeat.</p>
<p>When you find your PPOR, withdraw the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-292708"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4990691-leveraging-investment-property-to-purchase-first-home/page/2/#post-4991069" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b52fac9acf0a93ac3cf042785da97748</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic tax question in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4990967-tax-question-7/#post-4991066</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 13:36:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As it was rented out first then the CGT is calculated proportionally to the time rented out.</p>
<p>If it was lived in first then the calculation would be different.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just the way the ATO laws are.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">370882f5dc6c355eecb19fe8467e6f82</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Cross Collateralizing  in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4991056-cross-collateralizing/#post-4991064</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2014 13:21:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with the others above. Do not cross-collaterise as the only one this benefits is the lender.</p>
<p>The lender has all the control and if you get into any financial difficulty then your whole portfolio is at risk.</p>
<p>Put the control back into your hands and get a decent broker to sort it out for you ASAP.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60558857303f830b21b029d6593deb4b</guid>
				<title>PLC's profile was updated</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/activity/p/291159/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 16:48:58 +0000</pubDate>

				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d92e7db953edcffa9f2229f5acb0a02b</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Increase borrowing capacity in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4990289-increase-borrowing-capacity/#post-4990435</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 16:46:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the same thing Jamie with AMP. DUA to $850K at 90%.</p>
<p>Haven&#8217;t done a deal with them since late last year so might have changed.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4c6106b437d57f0d435429384b821e41</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Pros and Cons of Cross-Collateralization in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410890-pros-and-cons-of-cross-collateralization/#post-4700287</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 23:59:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many reasons not to cross loans. Banks have all the control. They can basically dictate to you what to do if you ever decide to sell or try to gain equity (i.e. you might not see the money from a sale or they won&#039;t let you access equity as your other propertie(s) have devalued).</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">faa33743d916422b02b20d0059821978</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Mortgage Brokers in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/mortgage-brokers-17/#post-4700253</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 07:15:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tom123 wrote:<br />
Hi PLC,</p>
<p>That&#039;s really interesting, Is there any other documents you might have to blacken out? and when you email them to the lender, which department would you email them to / contact?</p>
<p>Cheers, Tom</p>
<p>Off the top of my head I cannot think of anything apart from tax file numbers. When you email the supporting documents for the loan&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-434"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/mortgage-brokers-17/#post-4700253" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">985f727b17fd42af21e30ad80c5afe91</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Early mortgage repayment strategy in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/early-mortgage-repayment-strategy/#post-4696055</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:37:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qlds007 wrote:<br />
He lost me on post number 12 let alone post number 37.</p>
<p>I am totally confused.</p>
<p>I can understand posters wanting to help others out, but apart from the bewildering comments what is it with digging up old threads that are clearly dead and buried and rehashing them now?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a8398d7ebaf87e720c46a52b8169613d</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Mortgage Brokers in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410883-mortgage-brokers-17/#post-4700250</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 14:26:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>When my clients are buying, I usually advise them to allow a minimum of 45 days settlement from date of signing the contract. That way I&#039;m pretty confident that the loan will be submitted, approved, docs signed and returned, lender vetted, and settlement booked in time.</p>
<p>It can be done in a shorter time frame, however with Murphy and his&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-7953"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410883-mortgage-brokers-17/#post-4700250" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7f25ab19cbb97237cc0c639f53f384e7</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Equity to purchase 2nd property in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410866-equity-to-purchase-2nd-property/#post-4700195</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:18:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to realise that actual equity and usable equity are two different things when it comes to borrowing, and Jamie basically covered that part of the equation above.</p>
<p>To answer the other part of your question Newbie, you should really access the equity as a separate loan split under the same security, especially where IP&#039;s are concerned. That&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-32469"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410866-equity-to-purchase-2nd-property/#post-4700195" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">96bea1b6a36f7bc8f400fb2dbe6afe9a</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic borrowing power for an investment property in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410808-borrowing-power-for-an-investment-property/#post-4699920</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:28:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing not mentioned is with an investment there might be ongoing rental payments you pay which are an expense that aren&#039;t included when buying a PPOR. This will drastically affect borrowing capacity.</p>
<p>As mentioned too many variables are taken into account and it&#039;s not as straightforward as might be expected at first glance.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6ba9f1524ee19e0676db00435f9f0116</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Considering an IP in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410801-considering-an-ip/#post-4699850</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 13:01:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferdnand as Richard mentioned, there are better ways to use the cash than straight out as a deposit. If you don&#039;t like the money lying around use it to pay your existing PPOR mortgage, and then take out a loan for the cash amount against the PPOR and use that as the deposit. You still have the same total loan amount however it is advantageous as&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-8079"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410801-considering-an-ip/#post-4699850" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d8e0d6144874083379705358579ed71</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic First Property Help - Melbourne in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410798-first-property-help-melbourne/#post-4699823</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 03:54:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robbie,</p>
<p>In my opinion houses are better deals than apartments because you have greater options on what you can do with them going forward, and generally capital gain is higher with houses than apartments all things being equal.</p>
<p>Within your price range you will most likely be limited to one bedroom apartments in the inner city suburbs (you&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-242867"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410798-first-property-help-melbourne/#post-4699823" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ac42dfff6ca97617f36d6d03b9bf1ad9</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Investment versus home for a high income earner in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410730-investment-versus-home-for-a-high-income-earner/#post-4699480</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:50:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Jamie mentioned, the purpose of investing is not to claim money back come tax time, it is to make money in the long run whether it be through rental returns and/or capital gains.</p>
<p>The offset account you have gives you the possibility of going two ways. You can buy a PPOR using the money in the offset as a deposit and turning the current&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-236701"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410730-investment-versus-home-for-a-high-income-earner/#post-4699480" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6e9d314cd8d5f56807b8de335c501b8e</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Buyer Agent Suggesting CashBack Offer in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410725-buyer-agent-suggesting-cashback-offer/#post-4699455</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 06:33:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Richard.</p>
<p>You will find any rebates will be taken into account when the valuations are done so will come in lower, so you will still have to meet the savings requirements of the lender (i.e can&#039;t use the rebate as your deposit equity).</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2696a86c51015a305cd418530dd2671</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic House prices to drop 30%!! Or Will They? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410723-house-prices-to-drop-30-or-will-they/#post-4699436</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Feb 2014 16:42:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was mentioned and discussed in another thread on this forum a week or so ago.</p>
<p>As I said there, every year we have some doomsdayer talking about the collapse of the Australian property market, in fact Mr Dent predicted it would happen 2 years back. Funny how it didn&#039;t eventuate then. Suppose if he goes to the well enough&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2041"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410723-house-prices-to-drop-30-or-will-they/#post-4699436" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a170bb305927468540bf8c55c55d1b5c</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Mortage Broker Fees in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410697-mortage-broker-fees/#post-4699304</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Jamie said a comparison rate allows you to gauge the truer interest rate after taking into account other costs associated with the loan. So a loan with no or minimal fees &amp; costs will have a comparison rate close to the advertised interest rate while a loan with higher fees, costs will have a comparison rate much higher than the advertised&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-182485"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410697-mortage-broker-fees/#post-4699304" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e9949597029c951ab6c722c5a85822f1</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Using Equity as a Deposit for Investment Property: How Does it Work? in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410698-using-equity-as-a-deposit-for-investment-property-how-does-it-work/#post-4699317</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:09:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent8 wrote:<br />
Hi all,</p>
<p>Many thanks for your helpful replies &#8211; I appreciate it. I did double check this with my mortgage broker today and you are all right, he was trying to cross collateralise.</p>
<p>I told him I didn&#039;t want this, so he will get back to me with other products where this can be avoided.</p>
<p>However, he did advise that I may lose out in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-57895"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410698-using-equity-as-a-deposit-for-investment-property-how-does-it-work/#post-4699317" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">995801166b9f621d566743ac49cf99de</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Mortage Broker Fees in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410697-mortage-broker-fees/#post-4699297</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:23:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Terry I don&#039;t charge a fee, but I do know of some brokers out there who will charge for pre-approvals (who will then waive the fee if in the end you take out the loan through them).</p>
<p>As Terry said the way your partner is treated (non-resident, temp visa, etc) will affect whether approval from FIRB is needed, type of property you can buy and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-182478"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410697-mortage-broker-fees/#post-4699297" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60c4063d150a493328479ec5b4492e2d</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Using Equity as a Deposit for Investment Property: How Does it Work? in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410698-using-equity-as-a-deposit-for-investment-property-how-does-it-work/#post-4699311</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:52:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent8 wrote:<br />
Many thanks for your advice, Terry.</p>
<p>These were his exact words, if your good self or any other posters who are familiar with this topic can translate for me in laymens&#039; terms:</p>
<p>&quot;How it would work you would keep your property at $200k and continue to pay that P&amp;I and try and pay that down as you are doing, because there are no&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-57890"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410698-using-equity-as-a-deposit-for-investment-property-how-does-it-work/#post-4699311" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fa3cb66de1046a20605a47b387d45cd5</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Not losing FHOG if buying an Investment Property in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410664-not-losing-fhog-if-buying-an-investment-property/#post-4699174</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:58:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would need to check the relevant SRO in your state for eligibility requirements Mikal, however I would hazard to say the answer is yes.</p>
<p>I know in Victoria as long as the investment property was bought after July 2000 and is solely an investment property (i.e. never lived in by the title holder), then they are eligible for future FHOG. There&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-45076"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410664-not-losing-fhog-if-buying-an-investment-property/#post-4699174" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">21be51547d3bbd7f26c0b68bd8e3029c</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Another article predicting Australian property to crash in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410660-another-article-predicting-australian-property-to-crash/#post-4699163</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 03:42:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freckle wrote:</p>
<p>PLC wrote:<br />
Ah the good old doomsdayers, where would we be without them the last 10 or so years?</p>
<p>He&#039;s in good company then. Every financial player worth his salt is saying the same things. Humans like to stay positive and talk up their chances even in the face of adversity. The problem with that trait is that it often means we&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-45069"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410660-another-article-predicting-australian-property-to-crash/#post-4699163" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9023cd54add347c250f5c4d99cc2d9c3</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Another article predicting Australian property to crash in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410660-another-article-predicting-australian-property-to-crash/#post-4699159</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:19:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah the good old doomsdayers, where would we be without them the last 10 or so years?</p>
<p>Harry must be in town to promote another book or something. He predicted the same property crash in 2012. I suppose if you say it enough times it might come true eventually (dartboard&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-45065"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410660-another-article-predicting-australian-property-to-crash/#post-4699159" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e348660b5efda3524120c19c594dda04</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Finance, Stamp Duty &#38; First Home Queries in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410613-finance-stamp-duty-first-home-queries/#post-4698869</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2014 04:47:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed you mentioned gift as part of your deposit. What is the size of the gift compared to the remaining deposit, as most lenders require 5% in genuine savings over 3 months when borrowing above 85% LVR?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">90af664a43f263cabf2f4466482c01c8</guid>
				<title>PLC replied to the topic Melbourne suburb in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4410520-melbourne-suburb-2/#post-4698227</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 11:29:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think it is a nice pocket. Close to suburbs such as Yarraville, Williamstown, Altona Nth without their price tags, and not that far from the city.</p>
<p>Though I&#039;m not sure what effect the new housing developments on the old Don Smallgoods site will have.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 322/395 queries in 0.091 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-13 08:38:41 by W3 Total Cache
-->