Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Profile photo of JaazOptmJaazOptm
    Member
    @jaazoptm
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 3

    Thanks Marc for your clarification

    I’ve recently picked up a book by Margaret Lomas and realised Steve’s def. is a little flawed

    As for DaveA, you need to know the purchase price, rent return as well as the possible on-paper deductions u will be entitled to to work out if the property will be +ve CF. There’s a calculator on the website http://www.destiny.net.au to help u with all of that. I’m just about to check it out myself

    Hope it’s useful!![laughing]

    Profile photo of JaazOptmJaazOptm
    Member
    @jaazoptm
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 3

    Can u still use this shared equity product if your total borrowing does not exceed 80% LVR? e.g. 60% from the bank 20% from super fund

    Another Q is do u have to repay both the bank and super fund at the same time? or can you choose to repay the bank first?[oneeyed]

    Profile photo of JaazOptmJaazOptm
    Member
    @jaazoptm
    Join Date: 2007
    Post Count: 3

    Hi Marc

    I’m a newby so if what I say is incorrect or doesn’t make sense I hope u wouldn’t mind.

    I’ve read Steve’s books very recently, and from what i gathered, his definition of positive cash flow properties sounds a lot like ur positively geared property definition, and what you call positive cash flow property sounds more like a negatively geared property by Steve’s definition.

    Doesn’t a positive cash flow property need to make money from day one instead of through tax refund?

    confused…….

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)