<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Dan42 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/dan42/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/dan42/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Dan42.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 10:44:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b960f3d259174bb2cb40fcb010c88d64</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Rent Reduction in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4409032-rent-reduction/#post-4688763</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 06:08:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Normally I&#039;d say stick with the signed lease, but I notice you say the market rent is probably now around $550-$600 a week.</p>
<p>If it were me, I&#039;d offer a reduction of $50 &#8211; $75 a week (Still above market) with the tenant signing a 12 month lease from the date of the rent change.</p>
<p>It&#039;s not a s much as you were getting , but it&#039;s above market, and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-78655"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4409032-rent-reduction/#post-4688763" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60a910e03e60b666da3829e8ff367e0c</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Capital gains tax and other tax’s payable when we sell the property in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4409021-capital-gains-tax-and-other-taxs-payable-when-we-sell-the-property/#post-4688696</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 05:13:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You only pay CGT on sale, so if you kept the townhouses for rent, then you wouldn&#039;t pay anything at this stage.</p>
<p>But that&#039;s not avoiding the tax, it&#039;s only delaying it, unless you never sell. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">100371503711af14921daf28f36cd0d9</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Property Development using SMSF money in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408867-property-development-using-smsf-money/#post-4687569</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:10:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Borrowing in the Unit Trust may be an issue, as it could mean the SMSF investment may breach s71.</p>
<p>Best to see an expert and get this all sorted out before starting. SMSF&#039;s ownership of units in a related unit trust were tightened a couple of years ago. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9bd39bb960420835f9096f80b093c7ae</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic CGT issues regarding brand new PPOR in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408830-cgt-issues-regarding-brand-new-ppor/#post-4687287</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:26:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Option 1: &#8211; Shouldn&#039;t have any implications, as boarding is treated differently to renting. You would not be able to claim any expenses related to the boarder.</p>
<p>Option 2: &#8211; As discussed above, you would have to move in to be eligible for the main residence exemption. Depending on what it cost you to buy the land and build, and what you can sell it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-229112"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408830-cgt-issues-regarding-brand-new-ppor/#post-4687287" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7fd8462487b15a0983d2a95d986fe97b</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic CGT issues regarding brand new PPOR in the forum omacamo wrote</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408830-cgt-issues-regarding-brand-new-ppor/#post-4687286</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:22:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>omacamo wrote:</p>
<p>Option 2: I sell the place now before I have lived in it. I have had advice from a professional tax agent saying that the rule for classing a place as your PPOR is that you only have to prove intent of living in this property and if circumstances have changed then the exemption will still be valid even if I have not lived in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-254018"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408830-cgt-issues-regarding-brand-new-ppor/#post-4687286" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5b76bb866e3c68d8dbd11c4c7d3dfb1f</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Fully Owned Property in SA but not PPOR in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408503-fully-owned-property-in-sa-but-not-ppor/#post-4684466</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 23:00:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LC888 wrote:<br />
I was thinking of Geelong area (Newcomb) but getting conflicting advice from people around me, hence, now, thinking twice if I should focus on western suburbs around Melbourne (15km from CBD or thereabouts), which is still affordable ($450K) instead of Newcomb ($300K).</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>I don&#039;t know the area all that well, so&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-111445"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408503-fully-owned-property-in-sa-but-not-ppor/#post-4684466" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3ebe30a64f1cc3463eaf5e612ee1a26b</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Whose name? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408778-whose-name/#post-4686881</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:41:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mat,</p>
<p>Couple of questions &#8211; Do you both work? If so, are your income levels similar? Will the property be negatively geared to begin with? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5c18f82bd0b7b244a4566b6d77b6b571</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Fully Owned Property in SA but not PPOR in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408503-fully-owned-property-in-sa-but-not-ppor/#post-4684462</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:21:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LC888 wrote:</p>
<p>Shahin, last month, the net operating cost was&nbsp;$505.41. I bought the townhouse in 2007 for $375,000; it was appraised last year by my agent to be priced between $365,000-$385,000. When I applied for a line of credit using the townhouse as a security, it was valued by ANZ at $383,000. Therefore, annual CG is almost&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-111441"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408503-fully-owned-property-in-sa-but-not-ppor/#post-4684462" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7080420e1c55bfc40f0194c3dd51969f</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Fully Owned Property in SA but not PPOR in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408503-fully-owned-property-in-sa-but-not-ppor/#post-4684461</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:16:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Richard. Deliberately looking for a low yielding property just to reduce tax is poor advice, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Re: what should you do &#8211; it depends on your goals and priorities. I would look to using the equity in your SA townhouse to help purchase more property. But only if this fits with your long term goals.</p>
<p>Re: tax &#8211; Paying tax means&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-111440"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408503-fully-owned-property-in-sa-but-not-ppor/#post-4684461" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">852b7ecce45f7cd69533c241f32b80be</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Can fixed interest rates go any lower? in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408737-can-fixed-interest-rates-go-any-lower/#post-4686570</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 00:10:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jamie,</p>
<p>Just noticed CBA have done the same. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5b5da264b8c276c5fc30995ac12a0cd3</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic What CGT and GST am I up for when building apartments in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408745-what-cgt-and-gst-am-i-up-for-when-building-apartments/#post-4686632</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 23:29:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are building to sell, the profits will&nbsp;most likely be&nbsp;treated as revenue&nbsp;income, rather than capital profits. This means that you won&#039;t be eligible for any CGT discounts.</p>
<p>You will need to register for GST. You will be able to claim the GST on your building costs, and will have to pay GST on the sale of the apartments. You may be eligible&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-132261"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408745-what-cgt-and-gst-am-i-up-for-when-building-apartments/#post-4686632" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9de6ae719144b2889a277278982ffb65</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Is this possible? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408703-is-this-possible-7/#post-4686318</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:26:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately not. There are rules relating to related party transactions that would not allow your SMSF to purchase your residential property. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4ca2c2f91ab7106474e061a19e8d4645</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Owning Property But Not Living in It in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408693-owning-property-but-not-living-in-it/#post-4686253</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:21:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to what Terry said, you need to be able to show it was your main residence for a time. Things like getting the electricity and gas connected, changing your mailing address, changing your drivers licence address would be taken into account by the ATO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3e0a650e034fa97b29a982dc6dbc0f9a</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Company Tax in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408619-company-tax-3/#post-4685577</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:43:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To reiterate what Terry is saying, a trust can distribute profits to the company to recoup losses (assuming you pass the same ownership test) and then can distribute the remainder to individual beneficiaries.</p>
<p>That way you would pay the minimal amount of tax.</p>
<p>Also, just to clarify, the company doesn&#039;t get the CGT discount even if it receives the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-18107"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408619-company-tax-3/#post-4685577" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ded7ac2ec654c71716197dcdadff77a9</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Accountant Advice in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408401-accountant-advice/#post-4683577</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:15:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are moving from IP to PPOR, the capital gains tax is calculated on a &#039;percentage of time&#039; basis. For example, if it was an IP for 1 year, then PPOR fro 4 years, then sold, you would pay CGT on 20% of the gain. (As it was an IP for 1/5th of the time of ownership.)</p>
<p>You only need a valuation if you go from PPOR to IP, not the other way&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-213805"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408401-accountant-advice/#post-4683577" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">29c3b2e5898c327967dbe4382a8f6098</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Taking photo during the property inspection in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408456-taking-photo-during-the-property-inspection/#post-4683974</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:08:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m with Jamie. You are in someone else&#039;s private property, so they can make the rules. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">86bc8e6de2a3d08b22db6dc5ce7c5121</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Basic Accounting system? in the forum It sounds like you are past</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408300-basic-accounting-system/#post-4682714</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:18:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like you are past using a spreadsheet. There are a few &#039;cashbook&#039; type programs around, like Cashflow Manager, which are easier to use than MYOB or Quickbooks.</p>
<p>Have a look at <a href="http://www.cashflow-manager.com.au" rel="nofollow">http://www.cashflow-manager.com.au</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">eee7473779a24fbc7043230c49cbeb7f</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Minimise CGT on commercial property in the forum Have you used the commercial</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408307-minimise-cgt-on-commercial-property/#post-4682819</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 00:15:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you used the commercial property in your own business, or is it a straight rental?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c50c5fcb27ac0fb5173663c5237b0774</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic A word of warning on property in your SMSF in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408233-a-word-of-warning-on-property-in-your-smsf/#post-4682136</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 22:57:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with Richard, the advice from real estate agents in particular can be very damaging and costly to the client in the long run.</p>
<p>But the client also has to take some of the responsibility, for relying on the advice of a real estate agent in the first place.</p>
<p>I think as accountants we probably don&#039;t do a good enough job of telling&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-241191"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408233-a-word-of-warning-on-property-in-your-smsf/#post-4682136" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">06ff2aaf9177413f75242f637c09e36f</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Buying a house in a Family Trust in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406358-buying-a-house-in-a-family-trust/#post-4667842</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 22:18:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jessica,</p>
<p>Agree with Terry, you are getting advice that isn&#039;t tailored to your situation.</p>
<p>If the trust distributes profit only to you, then there is no tax saving. You would pay the same tax on trust distributions as you would on profit from rental properties if they were held in your own name. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7bf0ec87af11272de6439ae626f6392d</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic GST quesions related to "reno and sale" strategy in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407135-gst-quesions-related-to-reno-and-sale-strategy/#post-4673883</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:30:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are doing a cosmetic reno only, then no, you can&#039;t claim any GST, and you don&#039;t remit any GST on the sale.</p>
<p>If you are doing a substantial reno, you could be creating a &#039;new&#039; building for GST purposes, and you would have to remit GST on the sale of this building. THis is because it would be deemed a new building under the GST Act. With a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-129934"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407135-gst-quesions-related-to-reno-and-sale-strategy/#post-4673883" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b49a76b79525ae43cbb285bac63d00f6</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Hiding assets in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4408122-hiding-assets/#post-4681278</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 06:06:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#039;s nowhere you can &#039;hide&#039; assets.</p>
<p>However, a discretionary trust can provide asset protection. The family courts have in past cases &#039;looked through&#039; the trust t osee the beneficial owners of the assets, rendering the trust (in that particular case) next to useless.</p>
<p>The best advice I can give is don&#039;t get divorced. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0600c22eb694acbbcde5123f5c838565</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Trust for income distribution and distribution of current assets in the forum Agree with Scott, if only you</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407983-trust-for-income-distribution-and-distribution-of-current-assets/#post-4680101</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:52:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Scott, if only you had this in place before signing the contracts. Setting up trusts and transferring now means you will incur two sets of stamp duty, per property.</p>
<p>CGT in trusts is determined by the beneficiary. If the benfisiary of the capital gain is a company, then no discount is available. If it is distributed to individuals, then&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-158108"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407983-trust-for-income-distribution-and-distribution-of-current-assets/#post-4680101" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46fec71dc3674bcfef5efbfc3807e055</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic SMSF and Investment Property in the forum As Terry stated, they can't</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407960-smsf-and-investment-property/#post-4679888</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:36:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Terry stated, they can&#039;t take money out of their superannuation unless they meet a condition of release.</p>
<p>If they created an SMSF, they wouldn&#039;t even be allowed to buy the property from the individuals, as this would breach the related party rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">41887b719d098eac39eacdad43cbd4af</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic * When did you last move house ? * in the forum Forum Frolic</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407925-when-did-you-last-move-house/#post-4679582</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 00:48:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We last moved 15 months ago, to the &#039;forever&#039; house. Or maybe the &#039;forever until we retire and move to the beach&#039; house.</p>
<p>I&#039;m ashamed to say we still have books and other bits and pieces in boxes! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3b2e30de39514ca06ddcd5eb20831a9</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Units - How do they stack up? in the forum Manos, don't let the comments</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4368323-units-how-do-they-stack-up/#post-4431031</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:22:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manos, don&#039;t let the comments about Strata holdings put you off. Our first purchase was a small unit in a coastal town, and it is still our best decision. The strata don&#039;t bother us, and it is handled professionally and it has never been an issue.</p>
<p>A little later after buying this, we looked at a strata unit in the city, and decided against it,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-278613"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4368323-units-how-do-they-stack-up/#post-4431031" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8696357452630c195200c2234ff62e8f</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Structure question in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407728-structure-question-2/#post-4678306</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 02:09:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you wrote that you don&#039;t want to own the units, instead a company would hold them. IN that case, then you won&#039;t get any tax deductions. As Terry pointed out, the tax deductibility of interest in a unit trust is because the individual has borrowed to buy units in the unit trust. The unit holder gets to claim the deduction.</p>
<p>Purchasing the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-170879"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407728-structure-question-2/#post-4678306" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a4ecdd913e19e8a96adbbb65a0468b20</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Trust tax return in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407527-trust-tax-return/#post-4676765</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 23:38:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the trust&nbsp;registered with a tax agent? If not, the date for lodgement could be as early as 31 October.</p>
<p>If you are registered, it could be as late as 15 May. Check with your accountant if you are registered, and he/she will be able to tell you your lodgement date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ee3cedded9fadb76e07944232a9cad02</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Chan &#38; Naylor Accountants in the forum Points 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389910-chan-naylor-accountants/page/2/#post-4569283</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 06:31:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Points 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and possibly 6 are not unique to this type of arrangement. Item 2 is available in standard unit trusts. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d1d29dbe5db8657bf946351bc75655ed</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Accountant Fees - SMSF, Unit &#38; Discretionary Trusts, Company in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407469-accountant-fees-smsf-unit-discretionary-trusts-company/#post-4676433</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:43:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s always hard to tell, but from the information you have provided, it looks as though you have been overcharged.</p>
<p>The trusts and company could easily be done for half of what you paid, and the SMSF for a third of your bill. It does depend though, as Jac said, on how good your record keeping is.</p>
<p>Where are you and your accountant located?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b3ae67ffbba822eb9834df9babccb93e</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Capital Gains Tax Question in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407292-capital-gains-tax-question-3/#post-4674933</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 05:36:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Silicon,</p>
<p>As you had another PPOR, my first post is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">32a6dd69ebcb9ed8bd4d7ead21f87e4a</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Using a company in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407310-using-a-company/#post-4675057</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 05:30:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you can, but as Terry points out, you will pay CGT on the sale.</p>
<p>And you can&#039;t sell it at a discounted rate, as the CGT will be calculated on the market value at the time of sale.</p>
<p>I agree with Terry, it&#039;s not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9798caeb7a275c2bf38fc753586673c9</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Capital Gains Tax Question in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407292-capital-gains-tax-question-3/#post-4674930</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 05:37:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Silicon, Just re-read your post.</p>
<p>If you had another PPOR, you are liable for CGT only for the rented out portion, as I mentioned above.</p>
<p>If you didn&#039;t buy another property, this property can still be your PPOR, and no CGT calculations are required.</p>
<p>In this instance, it might be better if it was not your PPOR, as it looks like yo uwill trigger&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-182922"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407292-capital-gains-tax-question-3/#post-4674930" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">06594c2ade5a59782f3297c8dacdac53</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Joint Tennants Tax Q in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407293-joint-tennants-tax-q/#post-4674936</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 03:15:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Joint Tenants, everything is split 50/50. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9ba2aa5cfcc98a2a0b6073db7ad5555b</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Capital Gains Tax Question in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407292-capital-gains-tax-question-3/#post-4674928</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2012 01:06:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In your situation, the cost base for CGT purposes is actually the value of your property at the time it ceased being your PPOR.</p>
<p>Yes, you should have had a valuation done at the time the property was rented. You would need to speak to a valuer / real estate agent to see if they can do a retrospective valuation for you.</p>
<p>If the valuation is higher&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-182920"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407292-capital-gains-tax-question-3/#post-4674928" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">df6e36db2ec519f4db811af81df62388</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Claiming purchase expenses for last FY for a property settling this FY in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407127-claiming-purchase-expenses-for-last-fy-for-a-property-settling-this-fy/#post-4673813</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 05:56:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An initial; building / pest inspection is actually a cost of buying the property, and is not tax deductible. Instead, it forms part of the cost base for CGT purposes. You could claim the depreciuation schedule cost</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">998e6d5c812add5d307732a399630dc8</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic 6 year rule and CGT - vacant property enough? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407027-6-year-rule-and-cgt-vacant-property-enough/page/2/#post-4673006</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 07:21:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#039;s the relevent legislation; s118-145 ITAA 1997<em> (2)  If you use the </em><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html#part" rel="nofollow"><em>part</em></a><em> of the </em><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html#dwelling" rel="nofollow"><em>dwelling</em></a><em> that was your main residence for the  <span>* </span></em><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s995.1.html#purpose_of_producing_assessable_income" rel="nofollow"><em>purpose of producing  assessable income</em></a><em>, the maximum period that you can treat it as your main  residence under this section while you use it for that purpose is 6 </em><a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/itaa1997240/s974.50.html#year" rel="nofollow"><em>years</em></a><em>. You are entitled to another maximum period&hellip;</em><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-265946"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407027-6-year-rule-and-cgt-vacant-property-enough/page/2/#post-4673006" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">869d8bfb9551d163774cf4d84c888fb9</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic pension and assets...have I done the wrong thing? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407068-pension-and-assets-have-i-done-the-wrong-thing/#post-4673325</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2012 03:18:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were you living in the unit before you bought the country house? <em>I was told that by using the equity to buy house I would still be able to keep the pension.</em>Was it someone at Centrelink who told you that? That doesn&#039;t sound right to me, as what matters to Centrelink is the ASSETS, not how they were financed. Changing the loans, from my knowledge,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-194629"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407068-pension-and-assets-have-i-done-the-wrong-thing/#post-4673325" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a340e7ceced2ddcc2a0ca8e62c731f54</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic 6 year rule and CGT - vacant property enough? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407027-6-year-rule-and-cgt-vacant-property-enough/#post-4672995</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 04:39:11 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>learning curve2 wrote:<br />
Thanks TerryI was just after clarification on the CGT aspect. Great news to hear that I can leave the property vacant and not have to move back in myself after the current tenants leave and still bequalify for the exemption when I eventually sell it.Thanks again for the advice</p>
<p>Sorry to burst the bubble but that&#039;s not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-97014"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407027-6-year-rule-and-cgt-vacant-property-enough/#post-4672995" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89bc00bccd99f973768674e5028e9fdd</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic 6 year rule and CGT - vacant property enough? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407027-6-year-rule-and-cgt-vacant-property-enough/#post-4672991</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2012 04:26:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>learning curve2 wrote:<br />
To leave it untenanted for less than the 3mths. For example, tenants out by early January, leave it vacant for say a month and then start to re-advertise for new tenants, so all up it is left vacant for say 6 weeks (saying that it would take 2 weeks to find new tenants). Would that be seen as being a sufficient amount of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-97010"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4407027-6-year-rule-and-cgt-vacant-property-enough/#post-4672991" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3df0a11b39fb6a78384e7d3f4194551a</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic CGT in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406725-cgt-22/#post-4670965</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 04:16:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cabramatt wrote:<br />
Hi All,Sorry if these are dumb questions&#8230;I dont know where to find the answer so I am starting a new thread. I have 2 questions to ask about CGT:Situation 1: My partner has Property A (a PPOR).  Another property (property <img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/cool.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt="B)" title="B)" class="bbcode_smiley" /> was bought in August 2011 and settled in September 2011. We wanted to buy property B in order to knock d&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-68987"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406725-cgt-22/#post-4670965" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7a30cab0724abb029a9a0c4d3f5b6b3f</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Tax break with redraw on new property? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406668-tax-break-with-redraw-on-new-property/#post-4670522</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 23:24:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AC78 wrote:<br />
Spoke to accountant today who reassured me that if we redraw on our current PPOR loan to pay deposit for an investment property, the interest is still deductible as it is an expense incurred in gaining income. If we were to redraw on PPOR and then rent it out it would not be tax deductible but as loan for new property it is. What i&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-175102"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406668-tax-break-with-redraw-on-new-property/#post-4670522" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">32aabc685b310da4021f5cd890006c2e</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Borrow from LOC for IP repairs and other costs? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406617-borrow-from-loc-for-ip-repairs-and-other-costs/#post-4670003</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:47:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote:<br />
But now question is with borrowing to pay for interest? What are the acceptable reasons for ATO to believe that it is not a scheme but a genuine management of cash flow depending upon individual situation. </p>
<p>Th ATO are cracking down on this. If the rent from your IP is going to pay other non-deductible debt, then you may have an issue.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-90113"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406617-borrow-from-loc-for-ip-repairs-and-other-costs/#post-4670003" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d3c70fb12944cc831642aa4242e01da7</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Borrow from LOC for IP repairs and other costs? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406617-borrow-from-loc-for-ip-repairs-and-other-costs/#post-4669998</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 02:08:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Terry. The expense is deductible because it&#039;s a deduction incurred in gaining income. The interest in this situation would generally be deductible.One issue i have is that you talked about your rent going into a PPOR offset?<em>&quot;ATO should not see it as a way of increasing  tax deductible borrowing  and paying full rent into PPOR.&quot;</em>But they&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-90108"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406617-borrow-from-loc-for-ip-repairs-and-other-costs/#post-4669998" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a5883e663c4c3f428ed2f316371c8d49</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Tax and Depreciation Question in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406638-tax-and-depreciation-question/#post-4670161</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 01:57:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I am looking at having a security screen door installed in one of my IPs, it does not currently have one, and for security reasons the tenant wants one in the house, is this considered a capital expense as it is an improvement, or as it is required for safety/security, is it depreciable?</em>Generally, this would be able to be depreciated, as an&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-16350"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406638-tax-and-depreciation-question/#post-4670161" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c8c987debf5c7bd1da7009dcfd713978</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Purchase costs on small factory/warehouse +gst question in the forum Commercial Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406346-purchase-costs-on-small-factorywarehouse-gst-question/#post-4667697</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:17:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solomon10 wrote:<br />
Hi all, been looking at a few commercial properties for sale,small factories warehouses etc. What i would like to know is, with an advertised price of 300k plus gst,this would be 30k payable on settlement, would the purchaser also have to pay stamp duty like a residential property? Also how is gst paid if the purchaser doesn&#039;t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-52203"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406346-purchase-costs-on-small-factorywarehouse-gst-question/#post-4667697" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7eeffa56736da073bc112dbb9972550a</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic when do i have to pay tax if i sell my IP before 30.June in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406359-when-do-i-have-to-pay-tax-if-i-sell-my-ip-before-30-june/#post-4667846</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 00:03:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Capital gains tax is based on the contract date, so if you sign the contract pre- June 30, the income is declared in the 2011/12 financial year.The tax return must be lodged by October 31st (if you do it yourself) or as late as May 15 2013, if you are registered with a tax agent.You then usually get 21 days from the date of lodgement to pay the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-43557"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406359-when-do-i-have-to-pay-tax-if-i-sell-my-ip-before-30-june/#post-4667846" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">546316b8164b8ecd20dcacdafcb7082b</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic Recommendations of mortgage brokers in adelaide in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406347-recommendations-of-mortgage-brokers-in-adelaide/#post-4667705</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 23:58:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can recommend Jon Ward of Aussie Mortgage Brokers, based in Pirie Street. He worked really hard for us when we bought our new house last year. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8ba32c42a7f0b02627c9dd0175e7e462</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic contract of sale this financial year but settlement next financial - can you claim deductions now and depreciation schedule when in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406282-contract-of-sale-this-financial-year-but-settlement-next-financial-can-you-claim-deductions-now-and-depreciation-schedule-when/#post-4667147</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 04:09:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jadamo76 wrote:<br />
Is it worthwhile getting a depreciation schedule done up before settlement?  Or wait till after settlement?  I would not have a problem getting a surveyor access to the property. I am thinking with very little deductions this financial year might be worth getting a couple of costs through this financial year.</p>
<p>If you can get a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-46521"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406282-contract-of-sale-this-financial-year-but-settlement-next-financial-can-you-claim-deductions-now-and-depreciation-schedule-when/#post-4667147" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e56794efa89b139abd6c537746219b33</guid>
				<title>Dan42 replied to the topic contract of sale this financial year but settlement next financial - can you claim deductions now and depreciation schedule when in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406282-contract-of-sale-this-financial-year-but-settlement-next-financial-can-you-claim-deductions-now-and-depreciation-schedule-when/#post-4667145</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:20:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CGT acquisition date is the contract date, so 1st April. Interest on the deposit is claimable when the interest is paid, so you may have one month&#039;s deduction this financial year. Borrowing expenses on the main loan won&#039;t be charged until the loan is drawn, at settlement, so claimable from settlement date. <em>&quot;My thinking is that if it is considered&hellip;</em><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-46519"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4406282-contract-of-sale-this-financial-year-but-settlement-next-financial-can-you-claim-deductions-now-and-depreciation-schedule-when/#post-4667145" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 170/396 queries in 0.229 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-13 21:21:38 by W3 Total Cache
-->