<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | aussiemike | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/aussiemike/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/aussiemike/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for aussiemike.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:35:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">69bbe82169c167e9f972b9cc81c24277</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Overseas Income in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4375215-overseas-income/#post-4484751</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2004 08:49:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contract,</p>
<p>If the payment is for payment of services or &#8220;personal exertion&#8221; and you are an Australian Resident for tax purposes then you are assessed on income from all sources (regardless of where the income is earned).  You should consult a good accountant and determine whether the income is covered by Australian taw laws.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assume that it&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-145232"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4375215-overseas-income/#post-4484751" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">09b2e9ea760c35d69a38b5afd535ee33</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Gov Targeting Trusts in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374089-gov-targeting-trusts/#post-4476450</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 23:55:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some good news on the Bankruptcy Laws front.  The latest reforms have been withdrawn.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/www/ministerruddockhome.nsf/Web+Pages/7F3FC7CDB6C1374ACA256EDA00026EC1?OpenDocument" rel="nofollow">http://www.ag.gov.au/www/ministerruddockhome.nsf/Web+Pages/7F3FC7CDB6C1374ACA256EDA00026EC1?OpenDocument</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a580f109b45d8de56f6865cc4c67605f</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Cash flow + property -- who needs it??? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374961-cash-flow-property-who-needs-it/#post-4482444</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2004 02:51:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The assumption is that property will continue to make such capital gains.  As the economists are saying property is now at a historically high level i.e. around 9 times earnings and we know that this is not sustainable.  Either one of two things are going to happen (or maybe a combination of both).  Prices will decrease so that affordability is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-234562"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374961-cash-flow-property-who-needs-it/#post-4482444" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">97ebfe48982eefeacc4cfc5038ce861b</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/3/#post-4481908</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2004 04:07:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaun,</p>
<p>I trust that you are being facetious.  The bestest buddy ever is something I would sign for charity but &#8220;who i couldnt have gotten where i am without your help&#8221;.  Well unless this is true there is no way I would be signing such a clause.  I don&#8217;t know if you realise but making such a statement and signing it would legally enable you to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-270497"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/3/#post-4481908" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca7e69676a4f9651bbb535363c936abb</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481888</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 07:00:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like this is a new puzzle.  Aussiemike has won the book by correcting an incorrect variable.  WrapAttack is the rightful winner by using the correct variables.  Initially Aussiemike has won, then wrapattack wins as well.  But WrapAttack doesn&#8217;t want his book and offers it to Mel or auction.  Meanwhile Aussiemike offers his book to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-260222"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481888" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9a6f9c857ecc2997d860460958604e7d</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481885</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:56:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>More than happy for my book to go to Auction as well with the proceeds to the Smith Family.  They do a wonderful job.  Sounds like a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">372e70b049ba9bb0af2a633021e9fc89</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481882</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:50:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Steve you can&#8217;t even give your book away.  This is hysterical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3bc53115382d3d3cd46c66b894ea9a90</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481880</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:49:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that I seem to have won and the judges decision is final I would like to award my prize to WrapAttack.  At the time of posting they came up with the correct answer.</p>
<p>Ive had to change my clients figures so many times I&#8217;m just used to it.  Seriously though congrats WrapAttack.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e8a0da982ec237d1f174450d99727f9b</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481877</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:45:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I figured that Steve had made a mistake and just taken 1/4 as being 0.5 and therefore used 2.5% to determine the selling costs.</p>
<p>I agree that -1,505 is technically the correct answer but that wasn&#8217;t an option.  So like all good accountants I just played with the variable I figured was incorrect.</p>
<p>I do think the person that said -1,505 should get&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-260214"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/page/2/#post-4481877" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">18e3f3c86f2715205bb2eec42339177b</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic A quiz to get you thinking... in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/#post-4481866</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 06:25:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the answer to be E</p>
<p>Initial Purchase Price		 400,000.00</p>
<p>Plus : Closing Costs		 20,000.00<br />
Plus : Selling Costs @  2.5%	 10,950.00</p>
<p>Cost Base of Asset for Tax Purposes	 430,950.00</p>
<p>Sales Proceeds			 438,000.00</p>
<p>Capital Gain			 7,050.00<br />
Note : Not subject to 50% CGT<br />
Discount as held for less than<br />
12 months</p>
<p>Less : Cost of Property for 12&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-64485"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374889-a-quiz-to-get-you-thinking/#post-4481866" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">039f292003e4c3fdcf8c7c73765b2f3b</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Renting from Trust in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374861-renting-from-trust/#post-4481694</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:58:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry,</p>
<p>The changes to the Bankruptcy Laws are frightening.  Did you read Brett Davies Lawyers recent newsletter ?</p>
<p>This is for those that are interested.</p>
<p>There is a very naughty business called Casualife Furniture run by the Guss family. It builds up lots of ATO debt. They then voluntarily wind up their insolvent company. Not to worry. They just&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-145719"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374861-renting-from-trust/#post-4481694" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">37928e3808a7bf2f8310e3af4988412c</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Renting from Trust in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374861-renting-from-trust/#post-4481692</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:43:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WrapAttack,</p>
<p>I have expanded my response.  I am not quite sure what you mean when you say you paid it ? Are you saying that you paid the stamp duty when you transferred the share ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d345963f9a1980961a2deaaaf029bb30</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Renting from Trust in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374861-renting-from-trust/#post-4481691</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2004 04:23:42 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WrapAttack,</p>
<p>A few issues:-</p>
<p>1.  Although the company tax rate is 30% and any capital gains are assessed at that rate companies are also not entitled to the 50% CGT discount.  Trusts are entitled to the 50% CGT discount.  This could have a significant tax impact.  For example if you had a capital gain (after allowing for incidental costs,etc) of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-145716"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374861-renting-from-trust/#post-4481691" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bfd62d0c40422baac505b5ea379373fa</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Accountant Fees in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374775-accountant-fees/#post-4481179</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2004 10:14:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds reasonable to me.  My hourly charge out rate when I was in practice was $250 per hour.  Given that you had a few phone conversations (say 3 @ 10 minutes each that accounts for 1/2 hr and then another 1/2 hr discussing the trust situation with the lawyer and preparing relevant correspondence would equate to an hour on top of the hour you&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-114855"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374775-accountant-fees/#post-4481179" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">175a34a2423f0997b7876369e9ec3ceb</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Low Doc Loans and the ATO in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374623-low-doc-loans-and-the-ato/page/2/#post-4480248</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2004 01:40:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel,</p>
<p>Certainly not claiming you are evading tax but just a warning for those that think they can understate their tax or commit fraud or evasion and get away with it.  Those days are coming to an end.</p>
<p>And if the Tax Office does find that you have committed fraud they can refer it to the appropriate authorities e.g. Police, Centrelink, etc and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-274072"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374623-low-doc-loans-and-the-ato/page/2/#post-4480248" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0f5d926db217e751edbf83b21fdc4fc5</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Low Doc Loans and the ATO in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374623-low-doc-loans-and-the-ato/#post-4480241</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2004 04:41:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes and i certainly wouldn&#8217;t advise telling the ATO to go and jump.</p>
<p>Remember an administrative penalty of 20 penalty units ($2,200) applies if a taxpayer fails to provide ALL reasonable facilities to a taxation officer who is authorised by taxation law to have access to places, premises, books and other information (TAA Sch 1  sec 288-35 ). These&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-72329"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374623-low-doc-loans-and-the-ato/#post-4480241" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">787119c39aa44ab6233605f19aba12a2</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Negative gearing or positive gearing...whats best? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374519-negative-gearing-or-positive-gearing-whats-best/#post-4479621</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2004 05:15:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Krazy is talking about the Australian version of Monopoly which came out 1985.  Prior to that Australians had the London version of the game.  I think there are over 50 different countries for Monopoly now.  Great game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8d6adcedc9e68da8fd5ea709a3efcf6b</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic NEW IP not yet rented in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374498-new-ip-not-yet-rented/#post-4479525</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:57:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mortgage Advisor,</p>
<p>I would seek a private ruling from the ATO on this one.</p>
<p>You may be caught out under a few provisions:-</p>
<p>-the period of interest outgoings before the derivation of relevant assessable income is not so long that the necessary connection between outgoings and assessable income is lost;</p>
<p>(The ATO may consider 2 years to be too&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-101929"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374498-new-ip-not-yet-rented/#post-4479525" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c7d58a2d66199051f4743141d09e83de</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic NEW IP not yet rented in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374498-new-ip-not-yet-rented/#post-4479524</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:51:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooshie,</p>
<p>If you have trouble finding one that agrees then go elsewhere.  They are not up-to-date and are not worth the money you are spending on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2a5ed96fb15621bfe6e15b80b8714231</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic NEW IP not yet rented in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374498-new-ip-not-yet-rented/#post-4479523</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 22:46:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The relevant Taxation Ruling is TR 2004/4.</p>
<p>This ruling deals with the deductibility of interest on borrowed funds incurred before the commencement of, and after the cessation of, business activities. The ruling follows the High Court decision in Steele&#8217;s case (99 ATC 4242), and the Full Federal Court decisions in Brown&#8217;s case (99 ATC 4600) and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-101927"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374498-new-ip-not-yet-rented/#post-4479523" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d2c53bccfa501c0085e343b38b2c7f4f</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Pets &#38; Apartments in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479449</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baloo,</p>
<p>It is generally a landlord that either doesn&#8217;t have pets or thinks that they will destroy a property.  Of all the properties we have owned we have always allowed pets but obviously most tenants haven&#8217;t had them.  Of the 5 or so tenants who have had pets we have never had problems.  We also requested that the carpets be steam cleaned and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-81634"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479449" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">385d739d0a45a6b2593fd4be033f09e2</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Pets &#38; Apartments in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479447</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:54:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baloo,</p>
<p>No i don&#8217;t feel bad at all. In fact it is a landlords responsibility to know the body corporate laws and ask the relevant questions.  We were never asked if we had pets.  I think they assumed a couple with no children renting a $1,000 per week apartment would not have any &#8220;extras&#8221;.  Well thats there problem.  In fact we are excellent&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-81631"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479447" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ae31904e227b1f8d8255d807e02eba3d</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Pets &#38; Apartments in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479444</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:31:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monopoly,</p>
<p>Spot on.  There was also a clause for that but unfortunately my wife and I have good vision.  Well being a man I usually miss the toilet seat so I was instructed to sit down many years ago but I don&#8217;t think that would wash with the body corporate. But you are right a landlord would be in huge trouble with the anti discrimination&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-81625"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479444" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">50a37f681e249143ed3d367674afb9e2</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Pets &#38; Apartments in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479442</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 04:21:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im currently renting an apartment in Sydney (having sold all my properties) and my wife and I wanted to bring our lovely Bishon Frise with us.  Anyway the landlord was furious they found out we had a pet.  But being the diligent people we are we read the body corporate laws and there was a clause allowing animals for people with hearing&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-81622"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374485-pets-apartments/#post-4479442" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">676193c8ca0b591c29929bef9fdcb1f9</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic 30% Tax in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374425-30-tax/#post-4478952</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2004 04:52:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GreatPig,</p>
<p>You are correct.  Broadly speaking, any strategy directed at avoiding wastage of imputation benefits by directing the flow of franked distributions to members who can most benefit from them to the exclusion of other members, may amount to dividend streaming. When it applies, such benefits are treated as unfranked unrebatable dividends&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-71522"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374425-30-tax/#post-4478952" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">76fb335bb025cb419c91c1f26526e439</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic 30% Tax in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374425-30-tax/#post-4478946</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 11:42:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lizzy,</p>
<p>Your examples are correct but I think Mortgage Advisor was talking about keeping your tax levels BELOW the 30% rate.  In both of your examples this is achieved.</p>
<p>Note however that the $ 7,350 remaining in the company is the vehicle you will need to use for investing.  For some people this is not suitable as they want access to the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-71516"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374425-30-tax/#post-4478946" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1dd5dfbb3cf233b6be5788be23189bfc</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic 30% Tax in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374425-30-tax/#post-4478941</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2004 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MortgageAdvisor is correct.  This strategy will only work if you generate income through a company.  Personal Services Income (such as most PAYG) would not be open to this strategy as the income is treated as assessable in the hands of the taxpayer earning the income.  Basically to disinguish between PSI income and non PSI income you need to meet&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-71511"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374425-30-tax/#post-4478941" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a668d65ab220e301afe1c089cc28911f</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic in trouble in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374416-in-trouble/#post-4478898</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 07:05:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes increased demand will lead to demand pull inflation.  However this assumes that future demand would exceed current demand.  I would argue that the current level of demand would remain constant however the funding for that demand would be through savings rather than through debt.  Increased equity in property prices has already fuelled demand&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69608"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374416-in-trouble/#post-4478898" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e25637a8eb68c34c11b1818e1cb6770d</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic in trouble in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374416-in-trouble/#post-4478895</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2004 02:41:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SetMeFree,</p>
<p>I empathise with you and your wife&#8217;s situation.  Unfortunately there are many people in a similar situation to yourself and there are many players who are responsible.</p>
<p>Firstly I agree that it is a tragedy that our government taxes those who earn a high wage soo much (as I have said before I am not against streaming income from the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-69047"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374416-in-trouble/#post-4478895" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">89ed7be29c02ea0b49c76151eb8ca7e9</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Own Vs Renting in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374398-own-vs-renting/#post-4478737</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:49:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>redwing,</p>
<p>that is exactly what I have done.  I have sold all my Australian property including my PPOR.  I did this about 8 months ago now with the view that the Australian property market had peaked and I would take my gain (pay capital gains tax &#8211; except on my PPOR) and then wait for prices to fall and reinvest.</p>
<p>At the moment I am living in a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-96026"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374398-own-vs-renting/#post-4478737" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3513fb78bb96e54abc870b608aa7d3de</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Confused by Capital Gains Tax???? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374320-confused-by-capital-gains-tax/#post-4478234</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2004 13:22:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a taxpayer acquires a dwelling that is to become the taxpayer&#8217;s main residence and the taxpayer still owns an existing main residence, both dwellings are treated as the taxpayer&#8217;s main residence for up to six months (ITAA97 sec 118-140 ). However, this rule only applies if the taxpayer&#8217;s existing main residence was the taxpayer&#8217;s main residence&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-180436"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374320-confused-by-capital-gains-tax/#post-4478234" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">697e019a38cb6c548b37935e5ddd677e</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic UK Accountants in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374292-uk-accountants/#post-4478023</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2004 10:47:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Littlejohn Frazer for my UK property dealings.  They are based in Canary Wharf, London.   Contact number is 0011-44-20-7369 4524 and ask for Ted Brew.  Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cbd9b2d30089f43dff60115821174c50</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Change of trustee in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374197-change-of-trustee/#post-4477224</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 07:42:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the risk areas in adding a corporate beneficiary is triggering a resettlement.  If the coroporate beneficiary is already named as a beneficary under the trust deed, then clearly there is no resettlement issue to consider.  However, it is not so obvious where the company must be nominated or the trust deed altered.</p>
<p>Generally the ATO will&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-42220"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374197-change-of-trustee/#post-4477224" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0e51b94537318751c4bc47e2e6e2438a</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Change of trustee in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374197-change-of-trustee/#post-4477222</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2004 03:50:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you purchase the property in your name then you will be on title deeds and any trasfer will result in stamp duty being payable.</p>
<p>It will also trigger a CGT event but given that you would probably transfer the asset for the same price then this would not be an issue.</p>
<p>However stamp duty will be payable on the transfer.  Make sure you get the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-42218"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374197-change-of-trustee/#post-4477222" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a1917de814af3bfff4b844a9423aa693</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Taxman Crackdown on Low-Doc Loans in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374165-taxman-crackdown-on-low-doc-loans/#post-4476996</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2004 06:23:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either way those who have overstated their income on those low doc home loans could be hit both ways.  The Tax Office could firstly issue an amended assessment based on the income you stated in your low doc loan application (and it is up to the taxpayer to dispute that assessment).</p>
<p>Then if the taxpayer does prove that the income was overstated&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-251235"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374165-taxman-crackdown-on-low-doc-loans/#post-4476996" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">54563cb044d090e57e4a0be8de3d8199</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Prices falling Investors running away in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373983-prices-falling-investors-running-away/page/3/#post-4475610</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 07:37:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fundamental difference is between purchasing an investment and purchasing a good or service.  If I borrow for investment purposes and the investment decreases significantly in value (and the costs of servicing the investment do not exceed the income) then it is a poor investment.</p>
<p>What difference does it make as long as people keep repaying&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-214357"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373983-prices-falling-investors-running-away/page/3/#post-4475610" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">be9238c6066b67e445aac1b1755f4f94</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Invest from Company? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373937-invest-from-company/#post-4475295</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best vehicle for a negatively geared property depends on your taxation status.  But generally it is best held by the higher income earner and therefore the higher income tax payer.  Some people will try to make things highly complex with trusts, companies, etc.  but if the property is negatively geared and you are not in a high liability risk&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-112542"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373937-invest-from-company/#post-4475295" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3d9fe3824be264d5b2857e74a8ee6555</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Invest from Company? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373937-invest-from-company/#post-4475293</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 11:12:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also meant to mention that negative gearing is generally not recommended as a strategy for discretionary trusts as the losses are trapped at the trust level and imputation credits (from any dividends from shares &#8211; if you are using the same trust) could be lost.  Discretionary trusts for property investment are mainly desgined for positively geared&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-112540"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373937-invest-from-company/#post-4475293" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7efd4d79308e28f94d33e025db593010</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Invest from Company? in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373937-invest-from-company/#post-4475292</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 11:10:30 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite sure where you got 15% CGT through a trust but a discretionary trust can access the 50% CGT discount and, in addition, is able to distribute the tax-free amount to beneficiaries.  As TerryW claims this could mean that your CGT liability is nil depending on the beneficiaries that it is distributed to.  Capital gains in a superannuation&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-112539"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373937-invest-from-company/#post-4475292" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">70aef39859b6b80d267dd9c139646ee9</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic how much is enough? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374116-how-much-is-enough-3/#post-4476643</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 08:54:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cant speak for other people but I think most of us are looking for self-funded retirement and the ability to be able to maximise the funds we receive from our labour and ensure that it is invested to provide us with a passive income stream for the future.  For one person this may be a passive income stream of $10K while for another it may be a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-186292"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374116-how-much-is-enough-3/#post-4476643" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7e85c18ed9f857602feb0d0d366e8fc6</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Anyone been subject to ATO Tax Audit in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373787-anyone-been-subject-to-ato-tax-audit/#post-4474202</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 30 May 2004 07:12:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes you will need a receipt for any aggregated claims totally over $200.  If the aggregated claim is under $200 and the individual item to be claimed is under $10 the requirement to obtain a tax invoice from the supplier does not apply.</p>
<p>You will also need to make sure that the receipt has the words TAX INVOICE otherwise it is considered by the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-96101"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373787-anyone-been-subject-to-ato-tax-audit/#post-4474202" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">61480965ce63cd14705b1f7c80e6dec1</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Taxman targets property profits in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374092-taxman-targets-property-profits/#post-4476477</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 07:26:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do i support those who are fortunate contributing a fair share to taxation to assist those who are not.  Well it is probably because I am a socialist at heart.</p>
<p>I am one of the few fortunate souls whose parents benefited from family benefits while I was growing up (which enabled my mother to stay at home and raise a family) because my father&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-211397"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374092-taxman-targets-property-profits/#post-4476477" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1b04c17bad006145070b37c58c7c1cf1</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic What are you reading ? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374091-what-are-you-reading/#post-4476455</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 04:06:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoying the DaVinci Code at the moment.  I have a passion for conspiracy theories fiction.  Also a great fan of Patricia Cornwell (crime novelist).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f39b94682b19ba36387b0ef1cb6c6ab5</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Public Servants &#38; Property in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374088-public-servants-property/#post-4476444</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 03:48:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Greed may just be a disgruntled retrenchee having finished there time in the transit lounge.</p>
<p>We are all public servants in some form (i provide management consulting advice to clients &#8211; so i serve my clients &#8211; who happen to be part of the public).  lol.</p>
<p>Or maybe Greed is Henry Kaye who is disappointed that the current market is not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-175279"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374088-public-servants-property/#post-4476444" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e2a6a6ec0494a8dad827d75578886f2f</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Taxman targets property profits in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374092-taxman-targets-property-profits/#post-4476473</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 03:02:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes it is sad but the government taxes us soo much it is incredulous.  I have already made my plans to move to New York City in 2006.  Finish up my current projects and then move to a city that offers the same money, same rental (income % wise to Australia), but much lower taxes.  And then save and convert my USD to Aussie dollars.</p>
<p>My plan is to&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-211393"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374092-taxman-targets-property-profits/#post-4476473" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c8049b7b0cedd912bd071de97a61349e</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Taxman targets property profits in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374092-taxman-targets-property-profits/#post-4476472</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 29 May 2004 02:54:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the government will touch negative gearing as it caused too many problems the last time it was done under the Keating Government.  Negative gearing is also allowed for other types of investment such as shares so I doubt whether they would try anything.</p>
<p>However I do think that the 2.5% capital allowance could be scrapped.  I think&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-211392"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374092-taxman-targets-property-profits/#post-4476472" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fff820e6561259f6719b1c2c55ffd351</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Rental Increases in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374071-rental-increases-3/#post-4476322</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 12:40:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marisa,</p>
<p>That to me would be a sign to stay cautious. The majority of NSW property investors (in fact I could probably make the same comment about property investors in general) are like lemmings.  When one decides to jump over the cliff the rest follow.  Sounds like the cliff has moved from the eastern seaboard to the western one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9e99f60364dfdc2d2a63730419c64446</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Rental Increases in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374071-rental-increases-3/#post-4476319</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 11:32:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GMH,</p>
<p>I agree.  I used to live in Dural before moving into the CBD and I have a lot of friends out that way and every time I am out there I am amazed at the number of for lease signs.  I thought the Castle Hill, Glenhaven, Cherrybrook area was the sort of place for ones PPOR but the number of for lease signs has me perplexed.  Loved the area but&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-110704"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374071-rental-increases-3/#post-4476319" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">544511b15a7f86bff610c7558a998cf3</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic new apartments in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374081-new-apartments/#post-4476361</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2004 02:58:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melbourne apartments.</p>
<p>Enough said.</p>
<p>Initially I had just written the first two lines but thought I should expand.  The latest statistics are showing a decline in apartment prices in Melbourne and this has been happening for a short time now.</p>
<p>For a property in the high 300&#8217;s you are going to be struggling to get a positively geared property.  The&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-202809"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4374081-new-apartments/#post-4476361" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">385ba9c4fc3bbf95aa990c019c4cd0a7</guid>
				<title>aussiemike replied to the topic Stamp duty deductions in the forum Legal &#38; Accounting</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373866-stamp-duty-deductions/#post-4474763</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 03:44:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ATO&#8217;s current &#8216;Rental Properties&#8217; guide states (at page 4) that the costs of acquiring or disposing of a rental property (including stamp duty on the property transfer) are not deductible (but may be included in the property&#8217;s cost base for CGT purposes).</p>
<p>However, it also notes that the costs of preparing and registering a lease and the cost&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-49392"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373866-stamp-duty-deductions/#post-4474763" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 243/396 queries in 0.082 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-13 17:03:21 by W3 Total Cache
-->