Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Profile photo of skippygirlskippygirl
    Member
    @skippygirl
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 127

    OK I’ve had a nice evening with a best buddy and we have demolished 2 bottles of great red, and that always gets the creative juices going so thought I would put down in words my crazy idea (or one of them) for you all to comment on.

    When conducting my research on numerous suburbs, I find there is often a pocket, or distinct estate, or defined area, that somehow lost out in the “underlying valuable attributes” stakes i.e. they forgot to build a school, a transport hub, shops or some other key factor which gives an IP or even a PPOR some value score when you weigh it up on your investment template for comparing properties. Sometimes the result is a lack of investment in renovations etc and the whole area is dated.

    Sometimes I will see a defined geographical area of housing, all built within a short space of time, but no shops or school or something and so the whole area suffers from low or nil capital gains and as an investor, any property in that area scores low on the evaluation whilst adjoining estates rate higher because they have schools etc.

    So that leads me to thinking – how could I buy one of these and create the value factor via the necessary infrastructure that underpins value? Sure I could buy the worst house in one of the (generally mundane and unremarkable 1970’s brown brick 3 bed) streets, but unless there is a milk bar, school or bus station its capital value is always going to be constrained. Do I also buy some land and build a couple of shops, but what if the rest of the street is still drab?

    WHAT IF – let’s say a street has 20 houses in it, a group of 20 (or less) investors gradually bought the whole street by approaching the owners one by one, and then all the homes were renovated to lift the whole streetscape at once, AND you built and leased a few basic shops within a few hundred metres? Surely the value of all the homes would lift?

    Then you could move on to the next street. Alot of these areas never attracted families due to the lack of schools etc or those families have grown up and moved on so the older parents are left. I’ve often thought if I could get a hold of those houses in street-lots and provide a group of trendy shops, cafes etc then the family or household units that do not have children might pay for the value created in renovating the properties.

    Would it be feasible to get a group of people to buy a whole street of houses by approaching the owners and acquiring them over 1-2 years, and then renovating them and creating the necessary (minor) infrastructure to make them even more valuable? Or maybe better still obtain options over several houses, build a new group of shops and a child care centre and then exercise the options?

    Cheers

    skippygirl

    Profile photo of flatoutflatout
    Member
    @flatout
    Join Date: 2005
    Post Count: 64

    Ever read “A Town Like Alice”? Similiar kind of storyline…

    Flatout

    Profile photo of Stuart MilneStuart Milne
    Member
    @stuart-milne
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 196

    Perhaps you could buy as many as is possible between yourself and your family and friends. Then all you really need to do is compile the infrastructure required for the shops, daycare etc; and build it. Or attract some investment to the area. Then again some areas are simply awful and nothing will fix them except for a rather large explosion or bulldozer on a rampage…

    Stuart Milne
    Non-Conforming Specialist
    READY Mortgages
    http://www.readymortgages.com.au
    [email protected]
    Mob: 0404 056 055

    Profile photo of Jenny1Jenny1
    Member
    @jenny1
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 269

    Stop drinking red and see if white wine gives you further insight to other ideas[lmao]

    Jenny1

    Profile photo of boomtownboomtown
    Participant
    @boomtown
    Join Date: 2006
    Post Count: 5

    What you have just described is exactly how a ski resort developer like IntraWest operates.

    They buy large tracts of land on the side of a mountain – build a ski resort and lose money on operation of the ski resort. However they make a killing on the condos and commercial property in the village at the base of the hill.

    What you are talking about is the same principle on a smaller scale. What needs to be taken into consideration though is the financial viability of the star attraction. How much money do you stand to lose on the cafe etc in the hopes of pulling up the value of the surrounding property.

    Of course its much easier if you can convince the council to build / operate the star attraction for you.

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.