All Topics / Overseas Deals / NZ’s housing boom tops world index

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Profile photo of muppetmuppet
    Member
    @muppet
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 900

    Hi Guys

    Item in the NZ Herald today:

    <<sorry, cannot publish article here due to copyright, click here to see it though>>

    Regards

    Profile photo of muppetmuppet
    Member
    @muppet
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 900

    Hi Guys

    Here is a reply to the above article:

    Property Crash Evidence is Absent!

    New Zealand house prices in general are set to plateau over the next 12 months and not crash (*see EXCEPTIONS below). I suspect Australia and the UK will return to the days of negative equity (seen in the 1990’s in the UK) for many homeowners/investors by 2006/07. A small interest rate lift could easily magnify the coming slump and create havoc in Australia and the UK but to a much lesser degree in NZ.

    Consider these facts and then tell me NZ is in for a crash like Australia, and the UK:

    1) Australia is on the wrong side of a 6 year boom.
    The Uk is on the wrong side of a 4 year boom (which peaked with 30% growth in 2002).
    NZ didn’t even have 3 years of boom in this cycle.

    2) Australian and UK prices have increased by over 80% in the last 5 years.
    NZ prices haven’t even seen a 50% increase in the last 5 years.

    3) Australians have heavily over borrowed. They borrowed 10 times as much in the last 9 months as NZ’ers did! (Thats the equivalent of NZ’s TOTAL mortgage debt in just the last 9 months! i.e.$90 Billion).
    NZers only borrowed $9 Billion in the last 9 months.
    UK borrowings are increasing by around 9 Billion Pounds / month)

    4) Australians now owe over $570 Billion in mortgages, thats naerly 6.5 x NZ’s $90 Billion. (Aust population is only 5 x NZ’s)
    The UK owe 800 Billion pounds.

    5) Australians have been buying on yields of 2-4%.
    NZs yields have been more like 6-10%.

    * EXCEPTIONS
    The areas which will have a significant drop in values as a result of NZ’s property slump will be:
    1) Small towns (where many Australians are buying! These Australians have never seen small town NZ in tough economic times…)
    2) Small inner city apartments (Oversupplied, ironically some of these have been developed by Australian developers and these apartments are being marketed to Australians as a good investment at what appear to be inflated prices ($150,000 for studios! The irony of it all! Remember the Gold Coast properties being sold to kiwis at inflated prices in the 90’s…)

    Answers to a few common questions at the moment:

    Are we in for huge falls in values and a ‘property crash’?

    NO! I don’t believe it for a minute. When you consider the genuine Key Drivers of the property cycle it becomes plain to see that we have not taken values to the absurd levels for example that the Australian major cities have taken their property values to (in relation to the Key Drivers like return on investment, property vacancy rates, construction levels, population growth etc). Whilst current levels of return on investment are low (@5-8%) they have not reached the absurdly low levels seen in the major Australian cities (@2-4%) nor do I expect them to reach those levels in this cycle, our property vacancy rates are not extreme (We don’t have lots of empty properties due to a lack of demand). I’m not discounting house price falls but simply can’t see the signs of a wholesale ‘crash’.

    Will interest rates quickly crush property values?

    NO! Sure they will have an impact on some overextended borrowers but an increase in wholesale rates by even 1% p.a. would not immediately ‘crush’ property values. Given enough time then yes they could have a temporary influence on market values and here’s why. A third (33%) of all mortgages are on floating rates however another 30% are on a fixed term of less than 12 months.
    So if interest rates did spike or rise quickly it will take some time for this effect to impact on borrowers affordability.

    Will the oversupply in the Auckland inner city apartment market cause the collapse of property values across Auckland?

    NO! I fail to see how a niche market like inner city apartments can affect the value of the average suburban home for example.
    There are a total of @500,000 properties in greater Auckland and only @10,000 of these are inner city apartments (i.e. 2%) so whilst I believe there will be some decrease in rents across Auckland as a result of a ‘ripple’ effect emanating from the expected oversupply of inner city apartments I do not believe that this will impact on values to the same degree. Just think about the leaky building syndrome… Did that result in the collapse of every properties value across Auckland? NO, but it has certainly impacted on the value of those type of properties. The same can be expected to happen with inner city apartment values. In the short term inner city apartment values will suffer a correction (especially the under 40sqm ones) as rents find their new levels but this will not collapse values across Auckland.

    Doesn’t New Zealand just follow the Australian property market pattern (and therefore we are in for huge falls in values and a ‘property crash’?)

    NO! Some commentators would have us believe that NZ house prices always follow Australian house prices about 1 year later but my research reveals this not to be the case. New Zealand clearly does not automatically follow in the footsteps of Australia in respect of house price growth. In the mid 1990’s NZ had a Boom but Australia did not (nor did it in the early 1990’s.
    There is clearly no correlation throughout the whole decade of the 1990’s and was only very recently in the year of 2001-02.

    Also when I considered the trend of NZ versus Australian house price growth I found that New Zealands long term growth (last 14 years) is only about a third of Australias!

    The economist article shows by how much prices would need to fall to get back to their long-term average (over the last 28 years), assuming that the decline takes place over four years and that wages rise at a pace similar to that in the recent past. This is how they ascertain that house prices in NZ must fall by 15% to get back to that long-term average.

    What they haven’t taken account of is the financial deregulation we saw in the mid 1980’s resulting in making mortgage finance more accessible for property investment and also the baby boomers investment pattern impacting on house prices due to direct property investment becoming favourable since the mid 1990’s (rather than the old days of superannuation schemes).

    In summary just because some other countries like Australia and the UK have heavily over-inflated house prices which will crash significantly this doesn’t automatically mean that NZ will follow suit. There is a need to consider the complete makeup of the economy and the state of the fundamentals specifically driving the boom.

    In my study of historic property cycles in NZ,Australia,USA and the UK I found that the stronger the growth in a boom the higher the likelihood of a correction (negative growth) in the following slump.

    As Australian property market commentator Neil Jenman said to me this week “Australia has gone insane over house prices but NZ looks like it’s just on the brink of going insane”. Neil shares my opinion that NZ’s property market will not see the same correction as Australia.
    _________________
    Kieran Trass
    Hybrid Group

    Regards

    Profile photo of westanwestan
    Member
    @westan
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 1,950

    Hi all

    there was an interesting show on TV here in NZ on Sunday called 20-20, anyway the usual hype , talk to people in Sydney whose home has dropped by 30% blaa blaa, the point of the story was is a slump headed the way of NZ, Neil Jenman who was being interviewed said he felt unlike Australia prices were sustainable in NZ , he said in oz you are in for a very rough time, being his usual optomistic self. He maybe right but i’d hate to have him at a dinner party.

    I tend to agree with Trass on most of his points. The fact is New Zealand doesn’t know what a boom is.

    regards westan

    Profile photo of IbuycashflowIbuycashflow
    Participant
    @ibuycashflow
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 274
    Latest Property News
    Friday 4 June 2004
    Our web site

    Bubble will not burst in the short term

    In a report outlining their expectations for Australian property markets between 2004-2007, market forecasters BIS Shrapnel have predicted the housing market will flatten out during 2004/05 but will not experience a large scale drop in prices as other market commentators have predicted in the past.
    The report said steady demand for property and low interest rates will help ensure the housing bubble does not burst in the short term.
    This has been highlighted recently with the release of the latest vacancy rates from the Real Estate Institute of Australia showing the balance of supply and demand for property in most capital cities (with the exception of a few small pockets of oversupply) remained steady.
    The ‘vacancy rate’ for rental property is defined as the proportion of vacant rental property at any given time in the market as a percentage of the total number of rental properties in a market.
    Generally speaking a market with a vacancy rate of 2.5 – 3.0% or lower is experiencing a shortage of rental property, while a market where the vacancy rate is higher than 3.0% is experiencing an oversupply of property.
    The BIS report pointed out the fact that Australia is still operating in a period of strong economic growth and this, in conjunction with low interest rates, means owner occupiers and property investors are not yet feeling pressure or panic to sell.
    “Overall, underlying demand is expected to remain strong, supported by continued strong net overseas migration and improving economic growth and employment prospects,” BIS Shrapnel said.
    The report went on to say, “…the residential property market is not expected to enter a downturn until 2006/07 when high interest rates bring a price correction.”

    This was an article just emailed to me by IPR. Thought you might find it interesting

    Cheers
    Jeff

    Profile photo of melbearmelbear
    Member
    @melbear
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 2,429

    Hey guys

    Can’t resist a quick point on Kieran’s ‘article’. He compares the borrowings of Aus and NZ, and states that Aus is 10 times the Kiwis. Is that in total? Surely that’s so easily accounted for in our population differnces?

    Cheers
    Mel

    Profile photo of KtkiwiKtkiwi
    Member
    @ktkiwi
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 18

    Hi Melbear,

    Just to clarify for you:

    Aust population is only 5 x NZ’s…
    Aust borrowings during the 9 mth period were 10 x NZ’s borrowings in the same period…
    TOTAL Aust borrowings are 6.5 x NZ’s total…

    “Make sure you can survive the downside, and the upside will take care of itself!” Donald Trump

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.