<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | superman | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/superman/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/superman/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for superman.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 16:50:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8678e0fbfb7a29831a3ada1631fb1bfc</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Doom and gloom from OECD report in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4383382-doom-and-gloom-from-oecd-report/#post-4536471</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:37:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paleez, give us some credit, we vacillate around the low teens, 13th being the last I heard and we were as high as 6th somewhere in the 50&#8217;s-60&#8217;s.</p>
<p>We are an extremely wealthly nation and if you divide latent natural resources by population we are the potentially the wealthiest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">caa5ccba24ac627a64569aa85aa8231f</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic What to do? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381199-what-to-do-25/#post-4523001</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:39:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been meaning to add something to this for a few days now, but been too lazy [blush2].</p>
<p>My recommendation: buy exchange traded index funds<br />
STW which tracks S&amp;P 200<br />
SLF which tracks S&amp;P 200 Listed Property<br />
for info <a href="http://www.streettracks.com.au/" class="bbcode_url" rel="nofollow">http://www.streettracks.com.au/</a></p>
<p>The basic premise is that you&#8217;re not likely to beat the market, so why risk being flogged by it?&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-196048"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381199-what-to-do-25/#post-4523001" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5515e548bb69cb591024efd795093d5b</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic torn in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380701-torn/#post-4519728</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2005 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abugslife,<br />
I strongly disagree with your REIT shorting assertion. REIT&#8217;s are not, in fact, proxies for residential real estate and with an average yield of 7% how could they be? Holdings usually include hotels, retail, infrastructure, commercial, etc. Shorting such certainly would not be the bet you intend, given you have stated above that&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-227266"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380701-torn/#post-4519728" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b67bbfd3b70be53a7027b26b47ba08a9</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Houses overvalued by 25pc in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380685-houses-overvalued-by-25pc/#post-4519572</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 03:38:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So ian&#8217;s point is that it is possible and foundation&#8217;s, that it is unlikely. No problem.</p>
<p>If you rule out high inflation (i.e. above 3%), I would add, that it would be &#8220;exceedingly unlikely&#8221; because such a scenario would result in 2015 prices being 1.5 times more expensive than today, in real terms. More than 10 times the average salary!!! Surely&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10041"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380685-houses-overvalued-by-25pc/#post-4519572" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5d596ed20b65495b1229c420913424d8</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Houses overvalued by 25pc in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380685-houses-overvalued-by-25pc/#post-4519571</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 03:25:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems the optimistic view is that appreciation will equal inflation. Lets, again optimistically (for property), put this at 3%. So the real cost of ownership over the next decade, assuming 7% loans and 1% rates, maintenance, etc. is 5%.</p>
<p>I.e. if you are paying 5% of the value you would purchase in rent, you are breaking even. E.g. my requirements&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-10040"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380685-houses-overvalued-by-25pc/#post-4519571" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6d1cc58f7126e8c596b85dea34a5e5bd</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic WORLD DEPRESSION 2006 - 2008 in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380633-world-depression-2006-2008/page/2/#post-4519103</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 21:30:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retirement for the working class is only a 20th century concept. For most of history it was &#8216;work until you drop&#8217;. Then age pensions and superannuation plans (incl. 401k etc.) were introduced and initially, based on average life expectancy, one could only expect a few years of retirement.</p>
<p>Now it is an assumed right that one enjoys a good 15 years&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-253379"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380633-world-depression-2006-2008/page/2/#post-4519103" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7c5ed0f4e548e9145be2e0e7997a93e5</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic NEG GEARING?-IS YOUR TIME UP? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380318-neg-gearing-is-your-time-up/#post-4516881</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 23:42:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only means that the savings are reduced for the time being, since the government has taken no steps toward protecting this latest cut against inflation. Hell HECS and fuel excise tax are inflation adjusted, what about income tax?</p>
<p>I think the super surcharge elimination could have a more profound effect, as baby boomers close to retirement might&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-156132"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380318-neg-gearing-is-your-time-up/#post-4516881" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">46049226d631c8036d911a752ff0360a</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic The housing boom is back in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380219-the-housing-boom-is-back/#post-4515923</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2005 17:42:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by The Mortgage Adviser:</i><br />
and I am not influenced by the media like it seems can so easily influence you.</p>
<p>Cough, paleez</p>
<p><i>Originally posted by The Mortgage Adviser:</i><br />
The &#8216;Northern Beaches&#8217; is but a pimple on Sydney&#8217;s butt and I don&#8217;t think dmichie&#8217;s attendance at one or two auctions resulting in a 7% auction clearance rate could&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-85047"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380219-the-housing-boom-is-back/#post-4515923" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b04b23468e90b2de56da3d6c8c2f035e</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic JP Morgan says house prices to fall 10% in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380163-jp-morgan-says-house-prices-to-fall-10/page/3/#post-4515545</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US: top rate of 35% starting at $315K</p>
<p>I need to jump in here and explain how useless this statistic is, as it is often quoted. Fact is US pays FAR more tax than Australia. California holds closer to 1/4 than 1/5 of the US population and has state tax capping at over 10%. NY is &gt; 7% above 100k.</p>
<p>Then there is the social security tax of 6.2%. A&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-263851"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380163-jp-morgan-says-house-prices-to-fall-10/page/3/#post-4515545" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0893012d91f62c96329b237573723d7f</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Scenario â€“ Return on Investment Property in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380081-scenario-ae-return-on-investment-property/#post-4514897</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 22:39:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Assume 10% per annum growth in property value, 2.5% inflation per annum&#8221;</p>
<p>So it is exceeding inflation by 7.5% pa. And seems to be roughly neutrally geared. Even with 5% cost in and 3% out, it&#8217;s a truly inflation beating proposition. Unless I totally missed something [eh]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5cc8624ce46310ba2db11136cd32405d</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic First Time Poster in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380027-first-time-poster/page/3/#post-4514362</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 21:51:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahahahaha this is great slapstick [biggrin]</p>
<p>One point&#8230; there are bulls and there are bears. Do you think a property investment forum should only have bulls? The topics would be rather banal don&#8217;t you think? And a bear forum would be worse than dull, it would be down right depressing. So stop questioning peoples motives for posting, they have&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-286282"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380027-first-time-poster/page/3/#post-4514362" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a11228c587790c1caefc089bd45694d1</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Scenario â€“ Return on Investment Property in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380081-scenario-ae-return-on-investment-property/#post-4514895</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2005 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Assume 10% per annum growth in property value&#8221;</p>
<p>If you make this assumption then the rest of the numbers barely matter (within sensible ranges) and the answer is yes.</p>
<p>An exceptional investor could possibly achieve this, with luck on their side. But why not use sensible numbers that the average investor will achieve.</p>
<p>Rough math: (capital&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-20153"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380081-scenario-ae-return-on-investment-property/#post-4514895" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">913c09b7c855e986327a25e8d333d530</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic How much yield do you want? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379874-how-much-yield-do-you-want/#post-4513324</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 03:32:01 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeh yeh, I&#8217;ve got a sharp tongue, my bad, again, my wife keeps me in check [biggrin]. Now as for this investment, if you&#8217;re in the top tax bracket (let me run with 50% this time would ya [wink]) then the depreciation tax benefit equals the true capital loss. So the return becomes purely the gross 20%.</p>
<p>Now since this is gross, this value means&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-134424"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379874-how-much-yield-do-you-want/#post-4513324" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">696986dcaa2d731f8aac996261c5b3e8</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513768</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 03:06:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh I just saw it was a private message so I have it now. But it still sounds like 2% per month is the upper limit and this only compounds at 12.72% NET on the assumption of 47%.</p>
<p>I am not overly familiar with these instruments, so I really cannot pick at your numbers without my own research [biggrin]. However I strongly doubt they are low risk. If&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135472"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513768" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8fb734253da724762e463ab3dbeeb994</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513766</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 02:53:10 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I do appologize, I have been a little rude. [mellow] But I am enjoying the discourse and I&#8217;ll try reign myself in a little. [cap] N.B. ~ is generally accepted to mean roughly. So I don&#8217;t think it was terribly irresponsible of me to approximate 47% (+ medicare) to 50%.</p>
<p>Now, the reason I focus on NET returns, is that you cannot compound&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135470"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513766" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">eda00885fad4785ba3f9e60994004926</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513764</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:16:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You only have to account for tax.&#8221; Only!!? Top marginal rate is ~50%, there goes half your return. 12% takes 6.1 years to double as opposed to 3.2 at 24%. I think it is valid to assume all +ve cash income is taxed at this rate given the savings potential of Majoh.</p>
<p>Secondly, you say the &#8220;investment you have outlined&#8221; exhibits the phenomenal&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135468"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513764" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6b8fd25514161599b5fc09a769f7ba60</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513762</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehe, np man, hey you&#8217;re up late [blink]. It&#8217;s 10:45am here.</p>
<p>Back on topic. 3k gross is not 3k earnings. Earnings are after costs. +ve cash must be post-costs. If you&#8217;re talking pre-costs, everything is positive, by taking interest as a cost.</p>
<p>The discussion point is whether majoh&#8217;s returns are realistic. We have established that your return,&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135466"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513762" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7157d4df34999e1f3a9076a1e150985e</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513760</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:47:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You paid 650k for assets that currently return &gt;150k? Or you have assets currently valued at 650k returning &gt;150k? There is a big difference.</p>
<p>If you paid 650k pre-boom, for assets now valued at twice that, then this is half the return.</p>
<p>But if you have assets at today&#8217;s value worth 650k, i.e. anyone here could pick them up for 650k (+ expenses)&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135464"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513760" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ca719e81780f5748c5e5a85c555f8713</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513757</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 04:22:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually my previous calculation was based on 20k per year. My fopar, but here is the &#8220;in a vacuum&#8221; math, corrected for 25k pa.</p>
<p>0.28*(30000*1.28^8 + 25000*(1.28^7-1)/0.28)<br />
= $176k</p>
<p>So the exclusion of taxes and expenses and the fact that this assumes no difference between rent and capital appreciation makes this the most conservative scenario I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135462"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513757" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">804527681623dbb745c2e4678d49a9d8</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Help Needed Please in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513755</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 03:33:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel compelled to point this out. [blush2] Are you aware that your goal passive income requires ~28% per year compounding on your money? I think you will need to leverage your first born to pull this off. I say why stop there, if you leave your money compounding, you needn&#8217;t even contribute beyond the 8 years and you&#8217;ll break 10 BILLION ~40&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-135461"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379944-help-needed-please/#post-4513755" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c0b57b8c921751faa2fcd2989c76be25</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic How much yield do you want? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379874-how-much-yield-do-you-want/#post-4513322</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:28:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Land appreciates<br />
Infrastructure depreciates</p>
<p>So if you have a higher % of depreciating assets, a higher yield is needed to offset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4406266ab1485aef67a2b4c3f0c6ee99</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Is the US bubble about to burst? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379889-is-the-us-bubble-about-to-burst/#post-4513381</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:04:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our house finally listed last Thursday! The US started to slow a bit early this year, but in the last month [lmao]. We have 21 offers as of today, that&#8217;s 4 days. Yes you read that correctly [biggrin]. My wife and I are obviously thrilled and hoping the escrow goes well.</p>
<p>We listed slightly (say 2%) under market value so as to inflate demand. But&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-202948"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379889-is-the-us-bubble-about-to-burst/#post-4513381" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9ad207650ecabf8440ab7bec768b2dd7</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Don't follow the flock !! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379398-dont-follow-the-flock/page/2/#post-4510760</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2005 00:25:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by dmichie:</i><br />
superman &#8211; so your point is that the affordability situation in Brisbane is actually <b><i>worse</i></b> than the Demographia figures suggest?</p>
<p>BTW, I had already made this point in another post: Sydney is even less affordable when you consider that mortgage interest is tax deductible in the US, US interest rates are considerably&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-261995"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379398-dont-follow-the-flock/page/2/#post-4510760" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9f4b71c9be583bfca696b44219dbf4e2</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Don't follow the flock !! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379398-dont-follow-the-flock/page/2/#post-4510757</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:03:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now I need to pipe in&#8230;<br />
Brisbane:   6.0<br />
LA County: 10.1</p>
<p>Naive view: Oh Brissy is not that bad, check out LA. Brissy is affordable by international standards; overprice, overshmice.</p>
<p>WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!</p>
<p>The facts: average home loan rate is currently 6% which can be fixed for 30 years! You heard that correctly! Furthermore home interest is&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-261994"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379398-dont-follow-the-flock/page/2/#post-4510757" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4c51149462d7fa4adbbee1bf23b85fd4</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic melbournes growth in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379318-melbournes-growth/#post-4510168</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2005 01:45:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The endeavour to avoid LA-style is noble! I live in LA and UGH! There is a lot to be said for centralisation&#8230; I think living here has made me appreciate how important it is that Australian cities don&#8217;t go down the same path.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f1e7523d7c4bee0fc43f2cb96cb0fecf</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Property investing in USA in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379093-property-investing-in-usa/#post-4508849</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:49:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have purchasing experience in the US. I have lived here for 4 years with my wife. A little over a year ago we jumped into the Californian market and bought  in Lakewood, a city in LA County. Since I&#8217;m buying from within the US, I&#8217;m sure my experience is quite different from what you are chasing, but I&#8217;ll  mention a few things.</p>
<p>For one, just&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-245301"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4379093-property-investing-in-usa/#post-4508849" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">22854e242e728171b9a5aae314395783</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Are you putting your rent up? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378966-are-you-putting-your-rent-up/page/2/#post-4508079</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:25:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny you should mention &#8220;non deductible&#8221;. Over here home interest is a tax deduction! So owning (with a boarder) was only a few k more each year. But now heading back to aus, prices there are HIGHER vs income and interest is not a deduction.</p>
<p>They fret about LA house affordability, but Australian capital cities actually make LA look CHEAP&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-267230"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378966-are-you-putting-your-rent-up/page/2/#post-4508079" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">269a72814205932cd2b95bbc81726f4a</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Are you putting your rent up? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378966-are-you-putting-your-rent-up/page/2/#post-4508077</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:12:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems supply is dwindling and you might be able to demand more&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.finance.news.com.au/story/0,10166,12485854-14302,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.finance.news.com.au/story/0,10166,12485854-14302,00.html</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be back in a year and renting, so my bias is that yields stagnate. I figure at least a year of renting and readjusting to the Australian lifestyle (read 12 months of inebriation and BBQ&#8217;s) before we know&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-238359"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378966-are-you-putting-your-rent-up/page/2/#post-4508077" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">703901c9decfe4f458622203794883a1</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Oil and Real Estate in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378945-oil-and-real-estate/#post-4507923</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:06:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by Nobleone:</i><br />
Hi all,</p>
<p>I was a &#8216;peak oil&#8217; follower until I recently read this article&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general63/staline.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/general63/staline.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8230; which gives some very reasonable debate material re the abiotic oil argument.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a long read, but I always say that if you don&#8217;t read all the facts/theories/ideas etc you really cannot make&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-56834"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378945-oil-and-real-estate/#post-4507923" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">013e790d5d32a8192320a14f2fc40a6a</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Fundamental value in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378962-fundamental-value/#post-4508037</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2005 05:34:46 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That it is. But, how would the means of determining fundamental value have changed? I suggest that given this pdf was pre-euphoria it might actually be more accurate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3d1c783f7c9bf4ea59404f82a14e72ff</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Oil and Real Estate in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378945-oil-and-real-estate/#post-4507911</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2005 02:46:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh no, there was no mention of oil as a current risk, this is just my own theorizing. And non-CBD isn&#8217;t the sticks.</p>
<p>But, yes as you say, oil goes up economy responds, what happens <i>when</i> it REALLY goes up? $100 a barrel, in real terms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b8077d63b9637bdd83fd4fd058861b64</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Worm has turned in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378934-worm-has-turned/#post-4507784</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:26:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by Investigator:</i><br />
Hi Foundation,</p>
<p>I respect your opinion, however, wages don&#8217;t actually have any affect on Rent</p>
<p>Good morning Investigator, forgive me for jumping in here, but I&#8217;m fascinated by fundamentals discussions and I abhor your apparent oversight.</p>
<p>You are correct to state that supply and demand affects rents. Less rental&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-128795"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378934-worm-has-turned/#post-4507784" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">88c464d11e39dff81c4ec1a590e7136d</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Myth Busters! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378725-myth-busters/page/3/#post-4506528</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:16:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are returns, i.e. rent + appreciation. So they do not necessarily conflict with the previous values. The disucssion is whether house prices double every x years, so these figures cannot be compounded to this end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7175ab21f8adcef18a43441732a2149</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Myth Busters! in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378725-myth-busters/page/3/#post-4506525</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 03:29:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic link! Problem is over the last 100 years shares have outperformed&#8230; and over the last 20, significantly underperformed (N.B this doens&#8217;t include the 30% runup in &#8217;04). This makes me a little queezy about RE [confused2] but I want to go home and do some research on 20, 50 and 100 year trends and read this link in detail, thanks again.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-229116"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378725-myth-busters/page/3/#post-4506525" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">21305284c8d63700010e5281f99dd765</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Myth Busters - Episode 2! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378744-myth-busters-episode-2/page/2/#post-4506646</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:53:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>point to a decreasing number of people per household</p>
<p>Now that is interesting! So that will, in theory, increase the demand. But I can see a problem here; less people per house-hold, will mean lower inflation adjusted house-hold incomes. That should, in theory, <i>decrease</i> demand. So again the system is balanced. Surely it can get a little&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-248545"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378744-myth-busters-episode-2/page/2/#post-4506646" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f01ad2886cc2889456e4e06d3e522b1d</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Myth Busters - Episode 2! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378744-myth-busters-episode-2/#post-4506641</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:38:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn you do your research! Amazing stuff. If we can&#8217;t debate property issues, what are we doing here? On that note, seems troll has been redefined:</p>
<p>1. One who&#8217;s opinion does not match my own.</p>
<p>So is Myth Busters actually on air in Australia? I&#8217;m too long departed to know [confused2]. You even have their catch phrase to the teeth, &#8220;busted wide&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-131691"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378744-myth-busters-episode-2/#post-4506641" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7a3081a9be3514e1afbbbbd65349e4f2</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Myth Busters! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378725-myth-busters/page/2/#post-4506521</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, you will no doubt discount me a troll-supporter now, because I agree with Foundation&#8217;s posts. But I honestly don&#8217;t see a single personal jab in any of his replies, whilst you are flatly undermining his integrity! [blush2] I was taught that the best demonstration of maturity was to walk away from an unnecessary conflict, i.e. ignore the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-243179"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378725-myth-busters/page/2/#post-4506521" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ce591641b3e01c4448fef79ae84e5c5a</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Why should RE appreciation outstrip inflation? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506608</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:54:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The means RBA controls inflation by removing money from the economy. For larger national debt, a smaller rise is necessary, for the same effect. So no matter what the initial rate (7% or 12%), assuming the same level of debt, a 0.50% would remove more money. But then we can&#8217;t really compare like that because we&#8217;ve never seen rates of 12%, while&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93405"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506608" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">113cb95632b89f7c53ab468b6e67b318</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Why should RE appreciation outstrip inflation? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506605</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:37:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks to the rise in debt levels, moves in interest rates are three times as potent as they were in the early 1990s.</p>
<p>Fortunately I think this is the reason we won&#8217;t be seeing 80&#8217;s-style interest rates within the next decade or so. Because the RBA (nearly said Fed, I&#8217;m stuck in US atm), can now pack a more concentrated punch, i.e. 0.25%&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93402"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506605" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4bdab5a836852b08b2a859994bb8ac08</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Why should RE appreciation outstrip inflation? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506601</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:57:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes this is what I often tout as the most likely scenario (in additional to a small initial drop, say 5-10%). Unfortunately 3.45% + 3.1% (average rental return end of &#8217;03) is less than the new rates will be, i.e. negative investment returns (on the geared component) for years to come.</p>
<p>Yes this is the <i>average</i> and yes everyone hopes (or knows) they&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93398"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506601" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">93848cf04c848a7380bc36a70be4511e</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Why should RE appreciation outstrip inflation? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506599</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:18:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow look at page 13, &#8220;Sydney House Prices&#8221; they did exactly what i said, a straight line up until 1990!! <img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/bigsmile.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=":D" title=":D" class="bbcode_smiley" />:D:D hehehe I&#8217;m happy about that <img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/smile.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=":)" title=":)" class="bbcode_smiley" /> that was independant thought [blush2]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a915e0d599872c97511d334c56043b34</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Why should RE appreciation outstrip inflation? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506598</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:11:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehe I&#8217;m too slow, you already updated with link <img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/smile.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=":)" title=":)" class="bbcode_smiley" /> wow, this looks like good stuff&#8230; time to read the whole thing. Thanks also wayneL [blush2]</p>
<p>Now&#8230; how about some opposing views? I love understanding (or trying to understand) both sides. I usually google one bias, then the other to try and get a balance. Actually that is one of the reasons I&#8217;m&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93394"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506598" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fe2f27045e71315ee8af6ad827b14b6d</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic Why should RE appreciation outstrip inflation? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506597</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:06:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ta Foundation,<br />
actually I was going to add a bullet point on demographics. The official forcast is for 25 million people by 2050 and very little, if any growth there after. I do no believe that a 25% increase is enough to strain supply. Australia is 98% the size of continental USA, which has ~300 mil, albeit Aus is a little less temperate, read&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93392"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4378741-why-should-re-appreciation-outstrip-inflation/#post-4506597" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9d1750c0c712549402c729d0c2ada194</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic ADDICTION - to this site -a lighter note in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365164-addiction-to-this-site-a-lighter-note/#post-4412973</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2003 13:42:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does logging in at 3:42am from work qualify as an addiction? [<img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/neutral.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=":I" title=":I" class="bbcode_smiley" />] But I get to go home soon. [<img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/bigsmile.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=":D" title=":D" class="bbcode_smiley" />]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fa482b103fdf376b6bfd5bd0aa983ee1</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic buyers agents in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365093-buyers-agents/#post-4412675</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 06:54:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary,<br />
if you happen upon another one of those, email me [<img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/wink.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=";)" title=";)" class="bbcode_smiley" />]. Seriously!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f00e8db8b882d99f87b112c3517e1bd0</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic buyers agents in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365093-buyers-agents/#post-4412673</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:28:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dr Bell,<br />
I actually have a similar question. Since I live O.S. what is the general opinion of using services that find properties for you? Are these the same &#8216;buyers agents&#8217;? And then leading on to the question above, &#8220;are they worth their money in bargaining for the property&#8221;? Can anyone maybe offer some references so we can look at what they&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-183021"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365093-buyers-agents/#post-4412673" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">955a3a1db7090fde85065083f1daf755</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic First post from Aussie wanting to invest from U.S. in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365062-first-post-from-aussie-wanting-to-invest-from-u-s/#post-4412574</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 01:51:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input Tim. My wife and I are still considering partnerships, but they do add further complications. I think we&#8217;d prefer other options. But thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">69356476996d0b1a7ff202581d956b78</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic First post from Aussie wanting to invest from U.S. in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365062-first-post-from-aussie-wanting-to-invest-from-u-s/#post-4412571</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:04:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply, but I really don&#8217;t want to invest in the U.S. My wife and I will only be here for a few more years and don&#8217;t want the complexity of managing U.S. investments from Australia long-term. Also, our buying power is far less over here, this in turn cuts our ability to manage risk across multiple properties. We really want to know&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-251347"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365062-first-post-from-aussie-wanting-to-invest-from-u-s/#post-4412571" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3fa8bc88bb1f2ca1776e893d3ff457bd</guid>
				<title>superman replied to the topic First post from Aussie wanting to invest from U.S. in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365062-first-post-from-aussie-wanting-to-invest-from-u-s/#post-4412569</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2003 02:12:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately my visa all but rules this out and there is a plethora of other reasons. It&#8217;s Australian property or no property.[<img src="/wp-content/uploads/smileys/frown.gif?x75824" width="" height="" alt=":(" title=":(" class="bbcode_smiley" />]</p>
<p>Edited by &#8211; <a href="mailto:cjreeves8@hotmail.com" rel="nofollow">cjreeves8@hotmail.com</a> on 19/01/2003  11:13:18 AM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 331/394 queries in 0.084 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-13 06:02:17 by W3 Total Cache
-->