<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | 3056 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/3056/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/3056/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for 3056.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 02:33:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bdb05a5250c327526058bfbd8d6f9312</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Amount of rent based on tenants speed. in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4386725-amount-of-rent-based-on-tenants-speed/#post-4554267</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 08:20:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure whether that would be legal. As far as I&#8217;m aware, in VIC tenants can be up to two weeks late in any month before any action is taken against them. Also, I think a clause like that, if legal, would scare off prospective tenants.</p>
<p>There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary and those that don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">eb65fb011d8a5940726fcbfec3ed7827</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Is this a + CF Property???? in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4386547-is-this-a-cf-property/#post-4553334</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 09:18:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crystal,</p>
<p>$3260 divided by $85000 multiplied by 100% = approx 3.8% [happy3]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c89f289b654a101715166a35f3c677a2</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Am I going mad? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4386498-am-i-going-mad/#post-4553035</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 22:08:45 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question..I&#8217;m not sure whether to be excited or scared about having all these funds available to me. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s the right time to be buying more property just yet. I&#8217;ve been trading some gold stocks recently with reasonable success so I&#8217;ll continue to do that. But if gold price can revisit and break through its recent high of $US730&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-154929"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4386498-am-i-going-mad/#post-4553035" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2cc1283d1b7c1231dc59e0b9d1c1cad7</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Property potential loss of upto 100K! Help in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385989-property-potential-loss-of-upto-100k-help/#post-4550905</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely hold if you can afford to. You will one day look back, holding a substantial capital gain, and wonder what you were worried about. I bought a house in 1990 for $84,500 and it immediately began to fall in value. I thought it would never recover, let alone give me a capital gain. I would ask my agent every few months what it was worth. It&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-139942"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385989-property-potential-loss-of-upto-100k-help/#post-4550905" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">da742ea13fcd39d4fd19807ac55d2e25</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic property management fees in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385806-property-management-fees-3/#post-4549990</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 00:43:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>samjames,</p>
<p>I pay 5.5% (GST included) and I could not be happier with my agent. I have 3 properties with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">07000cacc550ead8b0d618010cb02f42</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Calculating total income in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385342-calculating-total-income/#post-4546747</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Tax rates 2005-06<br />
$0 â€“ $6,000 = Nil<br />
$6,001 â€“ $21,600 = 15c for each $1 over $6,000<br />
$21,601 â€“ $63,000 = $2,340 plus 30c for each $1 over $21,600<br />
$63,001 â€“ $95,000 =  $14,760 plus 42c for each $1 over $63,000<br />
Over $95,000  = $28,200 plus 47c for each $1 over $95,000<br />
The above rates do not include the Medicare levy of 1.5%</b></p>
<p>The top t&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-215782"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385342-calculating-total-income/#post-4546747" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">484e8e67e600526dadc2192d6268b3dc</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Calculating total income in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385342-calculating-total-income/#post-4546745</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 08:09:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andymitchell,</p>
<p>The withholding tax form is only of benefit to you if your taxable income is &#8220;reduced&#8221; because of your investment. In other words, your interest, bills, depreciation etc are greater than your rent. The net loss is used to reduce your taxable income, hence reduce your tax payments. So if you end up with a &#8220;higher&#8221; taxable income, why&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-215627"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385342-calculating-total-income/#post-4546745" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f160675e3d48328d0f295e7292831329</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne: What stage of property cycle? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385093-melbourne-what-stage-of-property-cycle/#post-4545460</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 09:11:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your reply ptn,</p>
<p>Property to double in five years, that&#8217;s highly optimistic in my opinion, but hey I won&#8217;t complain if you&#8217;re right. I&#8217;ve made a couple of very poor investment decisions over the last few years so that would really make my day (or five years).</p>
<p>I have 3 IPs. Two bought in 2001, fully paid off, good capital gains. One&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-125861"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385093-melbourne-what-stage-of-property-cycle/#post-4545460" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">26e7b9fb0777436251993c5db9ac1979</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Polishing up old floorboards in the forum Value Adding</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384894-polishing-up-old-floorboards/#post-4544410</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:52:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a great thread! Informative and very humorous![biggrin]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b22570450e231715319d4a293bc01189</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic virtual kickstart in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384625-virtual-kickstart/page/2/#post-4543085</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 07:42:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by Colin Gowan:</i><br />
3056 Please accept my apologies I didn&#8217;t intend to offend anyone.</p>
<p>No offence taken Colin.[blink]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">408b927ad1f124d2208fa186f2d89942</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic virtual kickstart in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384625-virtual-kickstart/#post-4543076</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:48:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand exactly what you are saying Simon and I take your comment as a compliment. I was just trying to make the point that the problem is the card owner, not the card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">adb3812deb0dedb3041889dd8484ea53</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic virtual kickstart in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384625-virtual-kickstart/#post-4543073</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:04:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by Colin Gowan:</i></p>
<p>Perhaps the first thing I suggest should be to cut up the theft cards, nobody needs them, if you are intelligent enough to be disciplined with repayments you are intelligent enough never to need them.<br />
Enough said about those evil cards.[evil4]</p>
<p>Credit cards are not evil, it&#8217;s the people who cannot manage them&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-120476"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384625-virtual-kickstart/#post-4543073" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">55cd10974ebc86255a6f434c89654d3f</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Whatâ€™s eating you? in the forum Opinionated!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384399-whataes-eating-you/#post-4541566</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:40:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;OK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">91e25fe33d49d47897077acb74839062</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Whatâ€™s eating you? in the forum Opinionated!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384399-whataes-eating-you/#post-4541563</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:21:24 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From the heart of my bottom&#8221;. At first I thought it was a typo. What a great come back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f96d209cf46d4e494a0d8068ec647486</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic loan in the forum Finance</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384189-loan-4/#post-4540718</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:31:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think an IO loan is great as long as the difference between the IO and PI monthly payment is also invested. If not, I would stick with a PI loan because you are not only disciplining yourself to save better by having to meet the larger repayment, but building equity in your property faster by reducing the loan (and saving interest) and getting&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-163222"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384189-loan-4/#post-4540718" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1362267e4146ab5cd411bb8cae7cfde4</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Landlord Inspections. in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384185-landlord-inspections/#post-4540690</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 09:39:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MK,</p>
<p>This is one of many reasons why I would never manage my own properties. There are so many advantages to using a PM I can&#8217;t understand why everyone doesn&#8217;t do the same. I pay 5% commission and it&#8217;s tax deductible. You say you like to save $20 per property by managing them yourself, but how do you know an agent wouldn&#8217;t get you more rent?<br />
I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-146323"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384185-landlord-inspections/#post-4540690" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1cc0dc4341d18e7b44b4a210210964f7</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540496</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:38:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Derek. By the way i&#8217;m Marco, not Steve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b36746d939bed5235eb34fac868610f9</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540494</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2006 01:06:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my point. Can we leave it at that, i&#8217;m tired of this. If i had have known i would be attacked for my post i would not have bothered. Everyone else on these forums seem to encourage each other and only offer positive feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">634dbb4a3cc7ed285d5e3c63b81e0b8a</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540492</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:50:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t you use TLS in your calculation? Or why don&#8217;t you use CBA when it was around $35 before it dropped to $24? It is easy to handpick stocks that have done well after they&#8217;ve gone up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c8a88bb385aaec59c41d431d1053eff6</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540491</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 14:43:52 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hb&#8230;</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t give me a lesson on shares.<br />
I know all about BHP, CBA and hundreds of other stocks. I&#8217;ve followed them for years. But you are right, they have by far outperformed property in the last 3 years. But before that, property did much better than stocks. Thats why you need to be diversified. So next time, read my posts correctly. I&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-223527"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540491" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">07ccf1336c28a3ed0dd3e85a79e4d290</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540486</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:23:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way, stock market&#8217;s gained about 20% in last year, 20% of $420,000 is $84,000, so your comment:<br />
&#8220;if you bought shares in just 1 year you&#8217;d be up $162K&#8221; is also unfounded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0503bb58875891ded74f2a73b10ff1a6</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540485</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 12:12:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hb..I believe in diversification of assets. I am fully aware of the performance of the stock market since 2003, I already have a share portfolio, although I wish it had been bigger. However, this is a PROPERTY forum. When I want to chat shares, I go to the Comsec chat room.<br />
Anyway, let me explain why I said what I said. I have 3 IPs, 2 I own&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-209571"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540485" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">697f62f23048c0552a6fdd13c11779dd</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Melbourne median property values up 5%? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540483</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 08:04:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read the paper and Melb has supposedly had a 5.6% increase in the median price of property for the December quarter. Suburbs where I have my IPs have supposedly outperformed this with around 7% increases. I was rather sceptical of the figures, but when I consider that the owner of the 2 new townhouses built next door to my townhouse in&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-258349"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384156-melbourne-median-property-values-up-5/#post-4540483" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a986b7c52848908a8d9b170c89ae722e</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic solicitor vs conveyancing services in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384151-solicitor-vs-conveyancing-services/#post-4540468</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2006 12:24:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that $6500 or $650?!? Either one sounds absurd to me. My last IP cost $420,000 (not that the property value should have any bearing on conveyancing cost) and I paid my conveyancer about $300 from memory. I&#8217;ve never used a solicitor for buying or selling property. Never had a problem. My agent has put together my section 32s and my conveyancer&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-122762"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384151-solicitor-vs-conveyancing-services/#post-4540468" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4b4c38958c6cf2bc97f00b3e9a07fae8</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Prospects for Brunswick &#38; Coburg (Melbourne) in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384046-prospects-for-brunswick-coburg-melbourne/#post-4539958</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:31:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again AP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">eaa80c9031bc424e5d0cd3f3168a7aa3</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Prospects for Brunswick &#38; Coburg (Melbourne) in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384046-prospects-for-brunswick-coburg-melbourne/#post-4539954</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:55:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you very much Alistair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e000b8db67cda0b5e08ddf763295e623</guid>
				<title>3056 replied to the topic Depreciation &#38; Negative Gearing in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4384028-depreciation-negative-gearing/#post-4539882</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 04:56:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up shake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 84/372 queries in 0.112 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 12:51:24 by W3 Total Cache
-->