<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | will | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/will/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/will/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for will.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 23:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5a0455933a6eddad3d8b840b0b726862</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic [moved] Developing and CGT in the forum Value Adding</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373300-moved-developing-and-cgt/#post-4470538</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2004 23:39:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes i see that no sale would not obvisously trigger CGT, however undertaking such an excercise with again as a example constructing 4 townhouses selling one to cover construction costs and holding the rest.</p>
<p>The problem could arise as the original purchase price of the land bought 10 years was 100K (giving approx 25K base for 1&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-252227"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4373300-moved-developing-and-cgt/#post-4470538" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">defc3a76b18e77af0ca24e400018152d</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic Property valuations in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366413-property-valuations/#post-4419308</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:54:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys,</p>
<p>Yes it is the same old story really isn&#8217;t it, all part of the fun though!!!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c6596a130aadcbabfb9812d329e63863</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic Opinions Please in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366408-opinions-please/#post-4419280</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2003 11:50:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Del,</p>
<p><em>Another possibility, (one which we are considering) is if you have a trust set up, purchase a property in the trust&#8217;s name &amp; rent it to you. That way you can have your cake and eat it too.</em></p>
<p>Just a note I recently read something on purchasing a residence by a family trust and then the subsequent leasing of it to family beneficiaries in the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-66960"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366408-opinions-please/#post-4419280" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d52580631805f49fbe96f63cb6b22746</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic Sydney Structuring talk in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366176-sydney-structuring-talk/#post-4417947</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2003 03:13:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in attending, see you there.</p>
<p>Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">349a05cc3b801d53d69dffb91cfa26a9</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic Renovating in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366057-renovating/#post-4417273</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2003 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the replies,</p>
<p>Interesting topic, as i was aware OB licences have a particular life and cycle. I thought that you could only apply for one every 3 years. This being the case i guess one would have to look at purchasing properties where the work required was all internal and not major so that you would not be limited in the number of&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-77284"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4366057-renovating/#post-4417273" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">22b55083af86ce443c05a8a0f1f7ccbe</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic Government's plan: bank co-own homes in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365941-governments-plan-bank-co-own-homes/#post-4416564</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 11:07:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe some great opportunities could present themself as Andrew mentioned. Split equity loans, you could in effect &#8216;half wrap&#8217; a property. Although there are many more issues to be sorted through on the topic! One to keep an eye on!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Will</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">548ff5402d6a91585a0319e711b1827a</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic GST and Commercial Property in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365921-gst-and-commercial-property/#post-4416414</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2003 09:20:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Michael and Hilary,</p>
<p>So from what you have written I can gather that as suspected GST would only apply to property value increases from July 2000 to date of sale if owned before intro of GST.</p>
<p><em>More advice from my (NSW) solicitor and accountant &#8211; that if you buy a going concern, then there is no GST applicable &#8211; this will only apply to&hellip;</em><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-233534"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365921-gst-and-commercial-property/#post-4416414" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a58eee4de3cd5cf9f99c83dab847b22b</guid>
				<title>will replied to the topic 4% depreciation in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365899-4-depreciation/#post-4416304</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2003 06:41:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stephen,</p>
<p>You will find that the depreciation schedule for the building cost using your example of 100K in 1987, begins in 1987. As the on paper value of the property is depreciated to reach zero in 25 years @ 4% or zero in 40 years @ 2.5%. So you have around 8 years of depreciation left. This is also something to consider in your projected&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-97199"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4365899-4-depreciation/#post-4416304" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 324/353 queries in 0.084 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-12 09:34:09 by W3 Total Cache
-->