<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | MattDelf | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/mattdelf/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/mattdelf/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for MattDelf.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 08:31:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">86d978b187840a565bc490770784a5ac</guid>
				<title>MattDelf replied to the topic Smoke alarm maintenance in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395851-smoke-alarm-maintenance/page/2/#post-4601665</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 03:59:40 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scott and BundyI put it to my PM that it was little unprofessional to send me the letter without any quotes, with the letter that signs away any fault on their part re smoke alarm legislation. Well she backed off quick smart, said I should not have received the letter and only some clients got the letter. Is this the clients who are not&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2705"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395851-smoke-alarm-maintenance/page/2/#post-4601665" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9c444755f447e33f71f4dffcf9370f08</guid>
				<title>MattDelf replied to the topic Smoke alarm maintenance in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395851-smoke-alarm-maintenance/#post-4601658</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 03:52:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this discussion started way back. But now in July 2009 I have just recieved a letter from my PM asking that I take on a $99 a year maintenance,/service per property for smoke alarms (I have four properties close together in Sydney). I have several issues with the request. Firstly they have given me no alternatives, no other quotes, no&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-2098"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4395851-smoke-alarm-maintenance/#post-4601658" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 80/347 queries in 0.111 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-17 19:16:19 by W3 Total Cache
-->