<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | johnbgoh | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/johnbgoh/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/johnbgoh/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for johnbgoh.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 23:19:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b783b2adb72a234ec0089f5b18467b6d</guid>
				<title>johnbgoh replied to the topic Structuring in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364900-structuring/#post-4411999</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2002 06:19:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: Structuring For WRAP and Buy/Hold</p>
<p>It seems that the common consensus is to use a discretionary &#8220;family&#8221; trust for Buy/Hold strategy and to use a company for the WRAP business. While I do understand the reason behind this i.e. potential capital growth for Buy/Hold and less growth for WRAP; why would&#8217;nt you want to use a discretionary trust for&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-27955"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364900-structuring/#post-4411999" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f01636538463121b8d23fc22b9e85294</guid>
				<title>johnbgoh replied to the topic 11 Second Solution - Step 1 - Is this Serious ? in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364859-11-second-solution-step-1-is-this-serious/#post-4411838</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2002 00:49:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the 11 second rule; you&#8217;re looking at residential property that can return about 10% on investment. Unfortunately, you will probably not find any in all major capital cities. In Sydney for example; you will still be able to find returns of around 7% if you look hard enough. The more exclusive the properties are, the worst the return&#8230;.some&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-93342"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364859-11-second-solution-step-1-is-this-serious/#post-4411838" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">78cd97c742d2ba096e782c11a0d53dca</guid>
				<title>johnbgoh replied to the topic Number 1 is done in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364836-number-1-is-done/#post-4411761</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:43:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulation AD. You have done well in such a short time and I am sure you will be going on to a very successful future in property investing. I understand you will be attending the upcoming seminar in November and I sure will like to catch up with you regarding prospecting in Queensland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e427eba224364a3bb2aced89dee22207</guid>
				<title>johnbgoh replied to the topic Proposed Split Equity Property in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364809-proposed-split-equity-property/#post-4411640</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2002 05:38:44 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>Thanks for your response. I think you are right about the government wanting to help the first home buyer. If the concept is available to all, it will have a major boost to the property market causing price inflation to the point of bursting. This is because those who already own (or almost own) their property would want to upgrade.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-164567"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4364809-proposed-split-equity-property/#post-4411640" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 211/349 queries in 0.083 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-12 09:42:53 by W3 Total Cache
-->