<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | erwanjg | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/erwanjg/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/erwanjg/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for erwanjg.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9587c320246f6d011c3d11705ef81132</guid>
				<title>erwanjg replied to the topic Cash Flow Positive Property in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381769-cash-flow-positive-property/#post-4526816</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 05:12:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why everyone is against negative gearing property? A property is still an investment and I am willing to paid a little bit out of my pocket every week to still have a capital gain that will cover what I paid anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">573270df79d2c5e820f98312d20db0eb</guid>
				<title>erwanjg replied to the topic First investment- unit in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380088-first-investment-unit/#post-4514973</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 06:14:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think firstly you should ask the real estate what is the yield % (gross or rent return). After you compare it with the formula Purchase Price=annual rent/yield %.</p>
<p>the yield is due to the market.</p>
<p>So if   yield &gt; 6.57% (actual in your case, then the market price should be less than what is asked. If yield &lt; 6.57% then the price should be more so&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-203512"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380088-first-investment-unit/#post-4514973" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">bdea92be29b6ed9c15fec8f113874240</guid>
				<title>erwanjg replied to the topic Positive Cashflow Investing in Sydney in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380086-positive-cashflow-investing-in-sydney/#post-4514967</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 05:59:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firstly I suggest you to read the second book of Phil. You will discover than the goal is not to find a positive cashflow property (which is really hard in this moment everywhere in Australia) but find a &#8220;problem&#8221; and sell a solution to make a profit.<br />
I am not saying that such properties do not exist anymore but maybe you should write down a&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-184793"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380086-positive-cashflow-investing-in-sydney/#post-4514967" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 83/348 queries in 0.098 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 07:36:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->