- arkm TonyParticipant@arkm-tonyJoin Date: 2021Post Count: 0
I’ll investigate this a bit more and get back to you. My initial thoughts would be no as its not sprayed or usually friable, however it probably will pose a hazard similar to synthetic mineral fibre and glass fibre materials. But as I said I will investigate some more. Thanks for the query.joanadavidsonParticipant@joanadavidsonJoin Date: 2021Post Count: 0
Asbestos containing material is rated for risk on a few things but basically if it can crumble between your fingers and is in your face that’s when its a significant risk. So a painted and sealed asbestos cement sheet is not a problem unless you drill it and have your face unprotected near it. But something like pipe lagging can be hazardous in place as its surface can be dry and worn. So to assess the risk firstly is it friable or non friable ( can you crush it with your fingers to powder)?, is it painted or sealed? is it exposed to weather or enclosed inside, how enclosed is it in regards to breathing spaces all those things have bearing on the risk. But basically don’t create or release asbestos fibres from it and don’t breathe them in. Everybody is now used to masks and you can get a basic P2 asbestos mask from a hardware store which also brings down the risk.
Let me know if that answers you question or if you have a specific ACM in mind you want to talk about. Thanks
went and did a bit more study on carbon fibre and there are no studies or results yet of long term health risks for exposure to respirable carbon fibres. Its too new a material, currently airborne dust monitoring is being done on some sites and measured to similar scales as synthetic mineral fibres and asbestos fibres but there is not enough information available yet about longer term reaction of the body and lungs to these fibres to know what effect they will have on the bodies cells. So you may be right long term this may be another material that causes adverse effects in humans. Asbestos replacements and substitutes such as synthetic mineral fibre, glass fibre and kaolinite fibre all were thought to be safe but all of those materials have been found to have adverse long term side effects in large enough concentrations and longer term exposures. So sorry I can’t give you a definitive answer so mask up and follow safe procedures if you have to deal with it just like it was asbestos or fibreglass.
<div id=”TMPwmHiddenDiv”></div>DemmytrioParticipant@demmycollectionJoin Date: 2021Post Count: 0
Thank you for initiating this thread and taking the time to respond to questions. Following on from your response to Joanna, if there is a house that is on sale, built in 70s, has asbestos sheet in the wall, and the agent says, few holes in the wall that need to be fixed…does it mean that it is currently in a hazardous state?
Thanks for the post about the house – you will need to see the holes- Real estate agents tend to understate the problem- if it is just a couple of small holes then they just need sealing or patching. If its big holes with sheeting debris this may be a bigger problem. All houses built in the 1970s in Australia will have some type of asbestos in them – unless its been specifically removed its what builders used. If its asbestos cement sheeting then you need to keep damaging it for it to keep releasing asbestos fibres- like sanding or drilling. There would have been a fibre release when the damage was done but generally asbestos cement sheet doesn’t keep giving off asbestos unless its being further broken up – like hail & wind to roof or fencing. Asbestos is another part of real estate where you manage the risk, but it can also offer opportunity if everyone else is scared off.
Thank you Tony. Noted your response. In what ways would you say it is an opportunity? Unless one were in asbestos audit/removal such as yourself (and therefore have the expertise to not be scared by the A word:) I would say it is a scary one…so when you have a moment, could you please elaborate on the opportunity side. Very happy to call, but I am conscious of your time. So even a relevant video link is sufficient. Thanks again.DemmytrioParticipant@demmycollectionJoin Date: 2021Post Count: 0
Hi sandhya, I meant like any other problem with a house for example with cracked walls which needed stabilising or ants needing treatment. Many people like yourself are scared off by a house with an asbestos problem- even identifying it could mean securing a discount at purchase or knowing someone like a licenced asbestos removalist who can sort the problem out quickly and easily. Since 2019 the Australian tax office has been offering tax deductions for Asbestos Removal ( check with your accountant) Whats the mantra- buy a house with a problem and solve it!
That’s all I meant- especially since most people see it as too hard or too scary- yet in NZ you also have to test for mould and drug labs and that,s mandatory! Hope that helps.
Hi demmy, sorry I didnt reply sooner there was some IT problem with me directly replying. Yes you can take your own samples in a residential property providing you follow the safety precautions on how to take it. Also in most states you can remove up to 10 sq metres of non friable asbestos. In Canberra you aren’t allowed to do anything without an Asbestos Licence because of the “Mr Fluffy” fiasco. In Victoria you have also a time limit so you don’t remove 10 sq metres one day and 10 the next and so on…. The problem with doing it yourself is disposal – you can’t just take it to the tip as its hazardous waste and depending on the state and the amount you may need a hazardous material transport licence as well! Go to the site below to find you appropriate State rules and who to contact, remember residential asbestos rules are different to Commercial property asbestos rules.