After many years of great discussion, we've switched off new topics and replies. Every thread stays right here though, so you can still browse and search the whole archive any time.
For up-to-date chat with fellow investors, come join us on Facebook:
Each census we get asked whether we rent or own the property we’re in. Based on the answers published about a year later by the ABS, we can calculate the proportion of renters to owner-occupiers in a suburb.
I’ve heard some professionals in the industry suggest that investors want a high proportion of renters since it reflects demand. That is completely elbow-about-face.
Other experts suggest there’s some goldielocks range that is not too high and not too low.
What does the data say? Well here’s a chart based on calcs I made in 2018…
This chart shows the relationship between capital growth and proportion of renters. The figures used were from the 2016 census. The capital growth was for the 2 years from 2016 to 2018 (time of calculation).
The census before 2016 was 2011…
And before that we had 2006…
As you can see, the correlation doesn’t change even over a long period of time. And there’s no sweet-spot apparent either. The lower the proportion of renters, the better the capital growth.
It’s pretty straightforward analysis, but if you don’t have the data; or analysis skills; or you simply couldn’t be bothered, then spewing out a baseless opinion is an efficient alternative to being right.