Hi guys,
I’m sure this has been covered off before my time, but are you finding it difficult getting banks to consent to second mortgages? Do they have a right to decline the request? Also if they see a caveat is it a reason for them to not advance further funds under its mortgage ? Interested in your thoughts as I wouldn’t have thoughts it should be a big issue to them if they are within there lvr guidelines based on a recent valuation .
Thanks
In some states the first mortgagee needs to consent to a second mortgage bring lodged, in other states no consent will be needed.
Most major lenders will consent, but they want all parties to enter into a deed of priority so that they can be sure they will come first. I am not sure if they can refuse consent or not, but contractlly you are probably agreeing not to allow a second mortgage without getting their consider – you will be agreeing to this in your loan agreement with them.Keep in mind that a mortgage can still be effective if it remains unregistered – but less secure for the mortgagee.
A lender won’t lend any more money if there is a caveat on title.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
it’s still highly relevant today, we continue to see borrowers and brokers facing challenges when dealing with second mortgages and caveats.
Yes, banks can decline consent for a second mortgage. Most loan agreements include clauses requiring their approval before any additional charges are placed on the property, even if you’re within LVR limits.
A caveat is also a red flag, it indicates another party has a legal interest, which can stop lenders from advancing further funds until it’s removed.
even with strong equity, always check your mortgage terms and get lender approval before adding second mortgages or allowing caveats.
Knotegroup | Knote Group
https://www.knote.com.au/Yes, banks can decline second mortgage consent—often due to policy or priority concerns, and caveats can definitely raise red flags, even if LVR is fine.
caveats are used to show others that someone else has an equitable interest in the property. A legal interest is one recorded on title such as a registered second mortgage. This would be a legal interest.
A second mortgage could also be unregistered, it would then be an equitable interest. A caveat could be lodged, potentially, over the property to let others know and to help get priority over later registered mortgages.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.
