About to purchase first investment property and I am already confused

Plus another advantage is whilst you might be able to afford to buy using in your own name currently. you might only be able to support a couple of negatively geared properties before you cannot service anymore debt, which is when you can add your wifes income into it and buy in joint names from then. You wouldn’t be able to do this the other way around (Would have difficulty servicing the debt in own name after several joint name purchases)

Hi Meg

Welcome aboard :-)

I’m not an accountant so recommend you seek professional advice on the matter.

Generally speaking, if a property is going to be negatively geared then it’s ideal to have ownership (or a large portion of) in the higher income earners name as they pay more tax. Likewise, if the property is positively geared then it’s best to have ownership (or a large portion of) in the lower income earners name because they currently pay less tax.

However, keep in mind that rents tend to go up over time – so a property can be negatively geared today but move into positive down the track.

When it comes to borrowing, you can have both of you on the application (for borrowing capacity purposes) but just have one of you on the contract/title of the property (it just needs to be clearly explained to the lender that you’re doing so for tax purposes).

Lastly, if you own other properties, please make sure that they are not cross collaterised with this purchase. Also make sure that you maximise the deductions against this IP purchase by using borrowed funds to cover the deposit/costs rather than cash (this only applies if you have equity in another property already).

Cheers

Jamie

Technically only an accountant or financial planner can give you “advice” on financial position.  However the cashflow position of the property will be obvious to a good broker.

Generally a property on an interest only loan can become cashflow positive either by starting out as a positive cashflow property (sounds like this property is not in that category); or by you piling money into an offset account against the loan in order to reduce the interest payable; or by letting time do its thing and increase the rent each year; or a combination of these things.

Nether of you are in a particular high marginal tax bracket so i think it is relatively immaterial.

As Jacqui mentioned without any current PPOR debt your broker will i assume split the loan up between the property being purchased and your PPOR and link an offset account to one of these splits.

The loan can still be in joint names even though the Title is in one name only.

There are other considerations especially if you are happy living where you are and are interested in paying the IP debt down to generate more cash flow. If so then a DFT structure comes into consideration.

Not a black and white answer.

Cheers

Yours in Finance

To get the maximum benefit (if buying for tax reasons) you should also look in to buying new properties as you will also be able to claim against the depreciation of the property.

 @Qlds007: did you read all of the original question carefully? If not here it is:

• Participantmegb68062nd paragraph: “I have read on a forum that there’s not much point in putting a negatively geared property in joint names when the wife is not working. In my particular case my wife only works part time and she doesn’t earn much, only $25000 a year.” 

So obviously this person is looking to do negative gearing on his investment property, specially when he is in the high tax bracket which is a very wise move, unless you totally disregard the user’s aim as well as my comment. Now if you knew anything about negative gearing you would not put such a reply on my comment: “No sensible investors buys for tax reasons alone so i think it is best if we ignore the last posters comment”.

ALL sensible investors in the high tax bracket negatively gear their properties and put the savings back in to the property as its a way of paying off the property sooner. To be more effective in the negatively gearing process  any sensible investors and/or their advisors must look at how to reap the maximum benefits of this process. To do so any professional accountant will tell you that its best practice to go towards a new property and claim back the depreciation. Please look up this subject before you reply back.

By your signature I can see that you work in financial solutions but by your last comment I sense that you really do not have sufficient knowledge about this subject therefor I suggest that you do some more research before giving anybody advise on this matter. If you are a professional please look this subject up before you reply and/or delete my comment as you so happily suggested to do on my other post about capital gain.

Regards,

Frank Satar

Jpcashflow wrote:

it is always important to do your due diligence

I agree with the above ^^^

megb6086 – $350 a week on what seems to be a debt of $430,000 or there abouts is quite low in my eyes. (Happy to be corrected by other members if i am off the mark here).

Aside from tax reasons etc, the main question is, “Why this property/area?”. Are you expecting a large growth in the area to stimulate the rent going up with it for it to become cash positive without the need to dump cash into an offset to get it there?

With curiosity,

L_S

• This reply was modified 9 years, 12 months ago by  Little_Stone.

@richard: My dear apologies mate.  It was late at night here when I was reading this post but now that its morning I can see I was way off with reading the figures. Oops…I apologies for my mistake. Just learned that I should not be giving anymore feedback on any posts past 12am !!! lol :)

Cheers