All Topics / General Property / $1 block of land ?

Register Now for My Free Live Training Series!
Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Profile photo of DubstepDubstep
    Participant
    @dubstep
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 395
    Profile photo of N@thanN@than
    Participant
    @n-than
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 241

    I will be driving through Richmond on Wednesday! Will only be buying fuel not property though. Don't think I could ever live there though unless the pay was ridiculously good! which I doubt. Would be good if you could buy and bring in a kit home and rent it out but I don't think that is what they are after.

     

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    Cost of construction has potential to be high in remote towns. Lenders may not offer high LVRs also. Just a couple of things to check before diving in.

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of Kerryn101Kerryn101
    Member
    @kerryn101
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 17

    not to mention that it may have how many years you have to live there written into the comtract like the ex housing commission houses do in NSW (some times)

    they also may make it obligation to employee local builders

    so on the contract of sale you might have — minimum time of occupancy 7 years…

     must build through the following companies – ***** **** or ***** ****

    and if its like the HC houses in NSW with a minimum time of occupancy on there each time it sells before the time limit is up it has to restart (for example you live there 2 out of the 7 years and decided to sell, the buyer will have to sign a 7 year occupancy obligation) which would imply they arent a good resale home

    as you would assume the local builders would charge more for building a home than your mate down the road

    your house would depreciate in value while you live there

    the occupancy obligation would be off putting for investors so locals or those who want to move there would be your only possible buyers and most of them would know the land sold for $1 so they wouldn't want to pay much more (if they are smart…)

    than again it might not work like this lol

    Profile photo of N@thanN@than
    Participant
    @n-than
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 241
    Kerryn101 wrote:
    so on the contract of sale you might have — minimum time of occupancy 7 years…

     must build through the following companies – ***** **** or ***** ****

    and if its like the HC houses in NSW with a minimum time of occupancy on there each time it sells before the time limit is up it has to restart (for example you live there 2 out of the 7 years and decided to sell, the buyer will have to sign a 7 year occupancy obligation) which would imply they arent a good resale home

    How does that work Kerryn? If you sign saying that you have to occupy for 7 years but then can just sell and leave whenever?

    Just curious that's all, just have never heard that clause before.

    Cheers

    Profile photo of jmsracheljmsrachel
    Participant
    @jmsrachel
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 711

    Next time some one tells me what can you buy for $1, I'll tell them a block of land!

    Profile photo of DubstepDubstep
    Participant
    @dubstep
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 395

    You could sell them at the dollar shop !

    Profile photo of jmsracheljmsrachel
    Participant
    @jmsrachel
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 711
    Dubstep wrote:

    You could sell them at the dollar shop !

    Actually i've seen these blocks advertised in The Reject Shop catalogue!

    Profile photo of DubstepDubstep
    Participant
    @dubstep
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 395
    Profile photo of jmsracheljmsrachel
    Participant
    @jmsrachel
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 711

    I bet the bank won’t lend, too high of a risk

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    jmsrachel wrote:
    I bet the bank won't lend, too high of a risk

    My bank is willing to lend me up to 80c to buy that land. I am looking for a JV partner to finance the remaining 20c.

    Stamp duty must be more than the land too!

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of DubstepDubstep
    Participant
    @dubstep
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 395

    Hi Terry,

    Good luck mate !

    I do actually have 20c you can have, but you have to collect it yourself.

    Profile photo of Kerryn101Kerryn101
    Member
    @kerryn101
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 17

    Hey N@than, its on the contract of sale, you agree that you will live in the house till the 7 years are up, but if the house goes on sale before the time frame is up than the new buyer must live in the house for a fresh 7 years. (some times they do it for 5 years and i have heard of them with 10 year obligations also)

    housing commission have been doing it in areas they wish to mix the classes of people better for example about 2 years a go they sold up 30% of the houses around east nowra with this clases on the contract the houses sold for 50-90k renovated (fresh paint, new kitchens and bathrooms fully fenced yards)

    we looked at a few houses back when they were for sale but the issue was not only the amount of time you had to live there and the fact that if you sold it you are obligated to restart that time frame for the new buyers, but the areas they normally do it in are really low return along with high abuse

    some of the houses clearly had squatters in them and a few we even seen used needles and drugs laying around the yards

    but the logic behind it is they will get home owners in rather than investors, as the home owners will "hopefully" raise the quality of the area and bring more jobs to the area

    in all honesty in the areas we have seen these conditions of contract, i personally wouldn't take up the offers unless i was childless, 7 years obligation of living there with your family is not something i want.

    Profile photo of DerekDerek
    Member
    @derek
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 3,544

    Some WA country towns with diminishing populations ran similar programs 10 – 15 years ago. The intent was to attract people who could add value to the town in return for them getting a cheap property. Some of the early programs were reasonably successful, others not so. Preference was given to tradies who could help local farmers, towns folk and businesses through such activities as panel beaters, mechanics, auto electricians and so on.

    Unfortunately the attractiveness of a cheap house the culture shock of moving to a small country town

    Profile photo of AussieKiwiAussieKiwi
    Participant
    @aussiekiwi
    Join Date: 2012
    Post Count: 29

    Do you know if there is any restrictions place on this offer?

    And does anyone have any updates please

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Of course there would be restrictions.  THe land would be worth much more than $1 and this is being done to help the town economically.

    Probably such as:

    1. Must build on it within x months

    2. must be owner occupied.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 16 posts - 1 through 16 (of 16 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.