- jim64Member@jim64Join Date: 2012Post Count: 52
Please advise on what i am supposed to think here.I am proposing to double hammer head 2 torrens title building blocks with reciprocal free and unrestricted rights of way are to be created over areas marked A & B,being the driveway and service easment.The town planner has come back advising this would probably not be granted with the excuse of what if the neighbours have an argument over right of way?????? Huh,this right of way would be a legal document.He has advised to go back to a community title set up,which we are not keen on as common property is a hassle.We have tried 3 Torrens Title applications with this town planner,and always get go down the community title path.I really want the Torrens Title with right of way to proceed,should i lodge this and fight the possible weak excuse for not allowing it.I am in SA.
CheersScott No MatesParticipant@scott-no-matesJoin Date: 2005Post Count: 3,856
What is your issue with CT? At least all owners are liable for the upkeep of the common areas.
Unless you are able to put the access handle onto each property with no sharing of access or requirement on another owner to maintain the access.jim64Member@jim64Join Date: 2012Post Count: 52
In this casre community title means community property involving expensive civil works being a access road and services..By Torrens title the 2 hammerheads,i would have thought each block has its own access handle,in this case being 5 meters each.Why cant the services be run in each blocks handle,being retained within their own land.Everyone tells me its too hard,and a right of way will be required.