All Topics / Help Needed! / What to do?

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Profile photo of MattG536MattG536
    Member
    @mattg536
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 3

    Hi, I’m new here and to the concept of IP…
    I know my wife has asked a few questions also (Libra76)  
    Q1 – Is it better to buy an IP in both names or just in mine for the TAX advantage (hers is about 15% and mine is 38%) I know it seems like it would be better in mine only up until when we sell the property and capital gains tax will be greater on my half. So the question is, is it better to be on both names or in just mine over 5 to 10 years? 

    Q2 – Has anyone ever looked at the investment of putting more into the house you live in? No capital gains on that, but no tax advantage either, I find all this very hard to weigh up and analyze what are the best options for investment? 

    Q3 – Has anyone got some simple matrix to work investment advantages and profits based on income, TAX advantages etc…??? 

    Any helpful suggestions will be much appreciated
    Cheers
    MattG536

    Profile photo of ducksterduckster
    Participant
    @duckster
    Join Date: 2004
    Post Count: 1,674
    MattG536 wrote:
    Hi, I’m new here and to the concept of IP…
    I know my wife has asked a few questions also (Libra76)  
    Q1 – Is it better to buy an IP in both names or just in mine for the TAX advantage (hers is about 15% and mine is 38%) I know it seems like it would be better in mine only up until when we sell the property and capital gains tax will be greater on my half. So the question is, is it better to be on both names or in just mine over 5 to 10 years? 

    This is really a win now lose later situation.
    You need to consider if Libra76 will be taking time off work for maternity needs as negative gearing affects family payments
    or a lose now win later situation.
    A lot of investors plan never to sell to avoid CGT or pick a financial year they are not working to sell.
    Are you claiming depreciation on the building as your losses can be increased but this adds each year to capital gain by reducing the cost base. If newly built building cost of construction can be depreciated and claimed each year for 40 years.
    I can't give you financial advice so my answer may seem vague to you but you may wish to talk to an accountant about what is best in this situation.

    MattG536 wrote:
    Q2 – Has anyone ever looked at the investment of putting more into the house you live in? No capital gains on that, but no tax advantage either, I find all this very hard to weigh up and analyze what are the best options for investment? 

    Check into what an offset account on a home loan does ! (try searching for the term offset in this forum)

    MattG536 wrote:
    Q3 – Has anyone got some simple matrix to work investment advantages and profits based on income, TAX advantages etc…??? 

    http://www.spreadsheet123.com/ExcelTemplates/real-estate-investment-analysis-spreadsheet.html
    http://www.apimagazine.com.au/api-online/web-specials/2010/free-download-property-tracking-spreadsheet

    MattG536 wrote:
    Any helpful suggestions will be much appreciated
    Cheers
    MattG536
    Profile photo of slipperslipper
    Member
    @slipper
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 19

    Thanks for the links Duckster

    Profile photo of MattG536MattG536
    Member
    @mattg536
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 3

    Thanks duckster, very helpfull…
    I have an offset loan already…

    Profile photo of PC_MelbournePC_Melbourne
    Member
    @pc_melbourne
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 43
    MattG536 wrote:
    Hi, I’m new here and to the concept of IP…
    I know my wife has asked a few questions also (Libra76)  
    Q1 – Is it better to buy an IP in both names or just in mine for the TAX advantage (hers is about 15% and mine is 38%) I know it seems like it would be better in mine only up until when we sell the property and capital gains tax will be greater on my half. So the question is, is it better to be on both names or in just mine over 5 to 10 years? 

    Q2 – Has anyone ever looked at the investment of putting more into the house you live in? No capital gains on that, but no tax advantage either, I find all this very hard to weigh up and analyze what are the best options for investment? 

    Q3 – Has anyone got some simple matrix to work investment advantages and profits based on income, TAX advantages etc…??? 

    Any helpful suggestions will be much appreciated
    Cheers
    MattG536

    Hey There,

    We went through this choice when we started also. These are the reasons we did what we did.

    1) All IP Properties are in one of our names.
    – Simplifies Loans and Tax Time.
    – Person that earns the most has it in their name.
    – As an IP. If you ever sold it, it would incur CGT.
    – In the event we decided to sell an IP. We could move the property into the others name
    > Spouse to Spouse Transfer of IP is Stamp Duty exempt (In VIC anyway)
    > Therein we could transfer it, live in it for a few months and sell as PPOR to avoid CGT.
    > There are other rules of course, but nothing your accountant cannot advise you on.

    2) We put ALL extra money into the house we live in, and only leave enough money in savings to cover the Mortgage payments and general living. It saves us a heap in non tax deductible interest. in 2008 we had our money in savings and term deposits. The trouble is that the interest gained acts as income, so you end up paying more tax. Putting all money into mortgage is dollar wise more advantageous.

    3) I don’t think there is a simple matrix as such. Bunch of stuff floating on the net. I have also created a bunch of spreadsheets that forecast the tax return based on the sum of all properties. Once you understand the math, it isn’t so hard to do. It does however get a little tricky if you want to play with numbers as static spreadsheets are painful and confusing to change frequently. It is particularly not simple because it is dependant on the types of IP you purchase in the first place (for depreciation anyways) for maximum tax deductability.

    Things to be aware of for max tax advantages

    – Log all tax deductible expenses no matter how out there they are. Your accountant figures out the rest.
    > Failing to do this, will see you lose tax deductible dollars, however this number is usually quite low and insignificant.

    – Learn about Depreciation, and get a depreciation report done on the house.
    > e.g. We have 2 new build townhouse IP’s. Each has depreciation of 12K+ for at least the next 3-4 years.
    > Depreciation is money you can deduct without actually spending much.
    > In this example. 24K is tax deductible every year without spending a cent.

    – Keep detailed track of the money spent on mortgage and the gross income made on the IP. the difference in $ in tax deductible.

    – Learn or ask your accountant about the ATO PAYG Variation – All of the above rolled into 1 strategy. this is where if you can forecast the expenses on your IP’s and they are high enough. You can apply for a variation on the witholding tax your employer holds for your pay at work, in which case the ATO forbids your employer from witholding your income tax at payday for that financial year. Great Cashflow strategy.

    Hope this helps.

    Profile photo of Richard TaylorRichard Taylor
    Participant
    @qlds007
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 12,024

    PC Sorry old mate but there are a few inaccuracies in your last post:

    1) All IP Properties are in one of our names.
       Simplifies Loans and Tax Time. Not at all as it is the Title which dictates the deductibility. Title could be in 1 name and loan  in Joint or 2nd applicant as Guarantor.
    Person that earns the most has it in their name.
    As an IP. If you ever sold it, it would incur CGT. CGT is payable if the property is sold or there is a change in the Title.
    In the event we decided to sell an IP. We could move the property into the others name This would trigger CGT.
    Spouse to Spouse Transfer of IP is Stamp Duty exempt (In VIC anyway) This is incorrect. PPOR only.
    Therein we could transfer it, live in it for a few months and sell as PPOR to avoid CGT. This is incorrect..

    2) We put ALL extra money into the house we live in, and only leave enough money in savings to cover the Mortgage payments and general living. It saves us a heap in non tax deductible interest. in 2008 we had our money in savings and term deposits. The trouble is that the interest gained acts as income, so you end up paying more tax. Putting all money into mortgage is dollar wise more advantageous. You are better off to take out an interest only loan with 100% offset account attached to it and deposit all of your funds into this account rather than pay down the debt unless you intend the PPOR to be your residence for some time to come or never intend to rent the property out.

    Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender

    Profile photo of PC_MelbournePC_Melbourne
    Member
    @pc_melbourne
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 43

    Just shared experiences sir.

    1) One name is always simpler than 2. For us anyway.
    2) CGT is applicable on all things sold, but CGT is calculated on the basis profit. With transfers, market value is difficult to ascertain, unless an official audit takes place with a standalone valuer. It is equally as easy to shop around for a valuer that values items as lower in this day and age.
    3) Spouse to spouse transfer – I checked with 2 convenyancers.
    NSW – http://www.lpma.nsw.gov.au/about_us/faqs/paying_stamp_duty_on_a_transfer

    VIC – http://www.sro.vic.gov.au/sro/SROnav.nsf/childdocs/-98E8944DC5A0C753CA2575D100047764-62AE8FFFC6A03A7ECA2575D100049B29-D9EB851E6C3D0A65CA2575D1002B2AEB/$file/DutiesForm09.pdf

    This is VIC application form for transfer of land between spouses. Nothing suggesting PPOR ONLY

    No Offence Richard, but I would tend to take the advice of a legal conveyancer over a financial advisor on this matter, and by all means check with your conveyancer Legal yourself. I would dearly like to know the outcome..

    4) Dropping money PPOR vs IP Mortgage Offest.
    I would agree with you that dropping money into Mortgage Offset would be the way to go ONLY if my PPOR was unencumbered and owed nothing, and my income needed to go somewhere to offset interest payments. Unfortunately most of us still have mortgages on PPOR. In this common scenario, why would I opt to put money into an offset account for IP, that reduces my ability to negatively gear the variance as a tax deduction over and above the interest payable on my PPOR where the interest paid has no income tax deduction benefit to me?

    I do get where your coming from, in the IF scenario of renting out the PPOR in the future, and I guess the best strategy boils down to whether the investor has this intention to rent out PPOR in the future. But in the meantime of coming to this decision, the interest paid on PPOR is dead money with no practical use other than paying the bank.

    I find this advices like this tactical for mortgage brokers breeding fear and confusion so that the mortgages remain high, and commissions continue to be paid.

    I apologize for reacting negatively, I am speaking only from our experience only. And I have had some negative experiences with Brokers.

    – When we started investing Feb March 2009. 2 Mortgage Brokers told us that our serviceability could not extend beyond 2 IP’s
    > We have 4 now. (not including PPOR) I have just gotten approval on the last one last month. Ready for settlement.
    > And have planned our next 2 for the end of next year.

    – We were also told to put extra income into mortgage offset over PPOR
    > We ignored that, and put all money into PPOR
    > Last Fin Year, I did the math. We saved much more money in PPOR interest savings, than reducing IP via Offsets.
    > The Mortgage broker called us furious, that we had paid down our PPOR below $200K because he stopped getting paid commissions.

    – Every Time we went for a new property, the broker gave me a bleak outlook on serviceability and told me it was going to be tough. e
    > It took a while to realize that I was being frightened, confused and guided to the bank in thier product range.
    > Amusingly the banks were far more upbeat about financing and we always pulled it off.

    This is not to say that I hate mortgage brokers. There is a time and place to use these services, and I am sure your wonderful at it.
    I am simply sharing experiences as to why advice from this one discipline source has not worked for us.
    On the flip side, our first 2 properties, my broker was wonderfully helpful. Beyond 2 however advice became counter productive.

    Thanks for the input.

    Profile photo of Jacqui MiddletonJacqui Middleton
    Participant
    @jacm
    Join Date: 2009
    Post Count: 2,539

    re 4) :

    I think Richard means to also have an offset on your PPOR loan.  Pay into that instead of hand the money over to the mortgage itself.  Saves interest for you, but the money is retrievable if need be.

    Jacqui Middleton | Middleton Buyers Advocates
    http://www.middletonbuyersadvocates.com.au
    Email Me | Phone Me

    VIC Buyers' Agents for investors, home buyers & SMSFs.

    Profile photo of MattG536MattG536
    Member
    @mattg536
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 3

    Some good info…thanks everyone…

    Profile photo of wonderlandwonderland
    Member
    @wonderland
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 22
    duckster wrote:
    You need to consider if Libra76 will be taking time off work for maternity needs as negative gearing affects family payments

    Alot of interesting info here, its going to take me a while to have it sink into my brain!
    This one particular statement has gotten me? My partner and I are thinking about buying our first IP end of this year. However, we are also looking at starting a family probably another year or two. I was wondering how negative gearing affects family payments? Does anyone know much about this, can someone please elaborate?!

    Many thanks

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes, transfers between spouses in VIC is exempt from s tamp duty
    s43 of the Duties Act 2000
    http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/da200093/s43.html

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of number 8number 8
    Participant
    @number-8
    Join Date: 2010
    Post Count: 333

    Negative gearing will not reduce your income for the purposes of family tax assessment, unless you become a property business- this is where things become interesting….

    http://www.birchcorp.com.au

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic. If you don't have an account, you can register here.