All Topics / The Treasure Chest / wraps vs lease options

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Profile photo of Nathan1Nathan1
    Member
    @nathan1
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 30

    could someone help me with the pros and cons of a wrap vs lease options? I think I have my head around lease options now, but I’m still working out the details of how a wrap works. thanks.


    email: g e n e r a l g h e r k i n @ y a h o o . c o m
    phone: 0405 411 098

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Nathan,

    I am an advocate of both wraps and lease options in the right circumstance.

    The difference b/w the two techniques is that with a wrap the is actually a contract to buy the property… in a lease option there is only a right to buy, rather than an obligation to buy.

    The different nature of the contract creates the advantages and disadvantages.

    Wrap

    1. Get First Home Buyers Grant (timing dependant on what State you invest in) as a deposit making it a great low down strategy.

    2. You have a buyer rather than a tenant so you can legally pass on all ownership costs.

    3. You own the property until the last payment is made.

    Lease Option

    1. Might be easier to get finance as you are just having a normal tenant relationship.

    2. Can still recover part of your cost as an option fee.

    3. You own the property until the right is exercised at which point you are usally cashed out.

    Hopefully you can see it is ‘horses for courses’. If your client has enough of a deposit or is able to get the FHOG then I’d go the wrap.

    If not then I’d go the lease option.

    Bye

    Steve McKnight

    **********
    Remember that success comes from doing things differently.
    **********

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Nathan

    Some more thoughts with lease options:
    1) it is also easier to withdraw any increase in equity.
    2) There may be a greater chance for the tenants to just walk away from the deal because they don’t ‘own’ the property.
    3) There may be a greater chance of the tenants cashing you out if they can get the FHOG down the track.

    Terry

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of Nathan1Nathan1
    Member
    @nathan1
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 30

    good points. I don’t mind if the tenant walks away because it means I’ve collected above-market rent for the period, which suits me just fine. What do you mean by “it is also easier to withdraw any increase in equity”?


    email: g e n e r a l g h e r k i n @ y a h o o . c o m
    phone: 0405 411 098

    Profile photo of TheBTheB
    Member
    @theb
    Join Date: 2002
    Post Count: 135

    Hi Nathan

    In some states (certainly Victoria due to the sale of land act) it is illegal to access the equity of a property that you are selling via a long term sale.

    In a lease option arrangement this does not apply and you may access increasing equity by means of increasing your loan.

    howzat ?

    the Bruce

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

The topic ‘wraps vs lease options’ is closed to new replies.