<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Tyson1985 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/tyson1985/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/tyson1985/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Tyson1985.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 05:42:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">66d6e31f47a0b701c27e29affbe8fbfa</guid>
				<title>Tyson1985 replied to the topic Rent to Buy Outlawed in SA in the forum Creative Investing</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389000-rent-to-buy-outlawed-in-sa/#post-4564754</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 10:44:41 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think your right there Steve,</p>
<p>Only thing being that the contract becomes voidable <i>not </i>void ab initio. The point being that from reading the amendment it would seem that it is not void from the beginning but rather void if the tenant chooses to rescind the contract.</p>
<p>SO there is hope but only if your extremely trusting of your tenant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 250/347 queries in 0.076 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 15:59:13 by W3 Total Cache
-->