<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | TheRC1 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/therc1/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/therc1/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for TheRC1.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 17:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1dc8305474d0df241270e3085e0b09c6</guid>
				<title>TheRC1 replied to the topic cap gains tax on own residence? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4369080-cap-gains-tax-on-own-residence/#post-4436951</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you only do this once?<br />
I think you can do this several times.</p>
<p>Here is a senario:<br />
You buy a place as your home (primary residence) and then upgrade after a few years (ie new home= new primary residence). The first place you rent out. Before six years is up on the first place you sell it.</p>
<p>You could do this again for the next upgrade.<br />
The tax&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-205354"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4369080-cap-gains-tax-on-own-residence/#post-4436951" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f12a5d914e162c31625cc11395078a92</guid>
				<title>TheRC1 replied to the topic 0 - 130 does not make you wealthy in the forum Opinionated!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4368301-0-130-does-not-make-you-wealthy/page/2/#post-4430838</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 13:33:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hannah,<br />
I have looked at some of these properties on richmastery.com.au and have wondered do they really stack up.</p>
<p>Has anyone used this service and purcahsed property through them and how has it panned out.</p>
<p>I might be too suspicious. But I am a believer in if its to good to be true it usually isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
RC1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">049fd5b5f21cc9b4cadda658f0b67d88</guid>
				<title>TheRC1 replied to the topic 11 sec rule is OLD lowball rule in the forum Opinionated!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4368411-11-sec-rule-is-old-lowball-rule/#post-4431699</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2003 12:15:23 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
You indicated that you have found another Ballarat property using the &#8220;11&#8221; second rule. Since reading your book I have been trying to find that illusive &#8220;ripe apple&#8221; and am wondering how many towns (i.e. markets) you have a background on and keep an eye on. In that; I&#8217;d suggest that you know the Ballarat market quiet well. How do you keep&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-182272"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4368411-11-sec-rule-is-old-lowball-rule/#post-4431699" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 106/348 queries in 0.065 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-14 03:59:31 by W3 Total Cache
-->