Rubbachook (nice name), I think you don’t really lose the tax deductibility, but rather don’t get any extra, you should still be able to claim the interest on the original loan amount for the IP, but not, as C2 suggested, the increased amount as the purpose on increasing htis loan was to pay not business related debt. (gee that was a long sentance!)
Watch out as there might be a sunset clause in the contract which may allow the builder to back out of the contract if the building is not complete by certain date.
I am not too keen on selling properties, and bascially beleive in keeping them for the long term. If you sell you have tax and agents fees etc, and then more stamp duty on the one you buy to replace it. I prefer to keep and use the equity for further investing.
If you are going to be living in it, I would think it wise to consider using available funds to buy your house first and then borrowing on this for deposits for your IPs. this way you could decrease non deductible debt.
Not a wise move from a tax perspective as the interest would not be tax deductible. But if you could get clear title on your PPOR, they should give you peace of mind at least.
I beleive you can go to the local court and get a summons issued. For a small fee the sherrif can then serve the summons on the tenant and they have a few weeks to pay or dispute the matter. Then the sherriff can garnish their pay or seize goods to be sold. I think it works like that in NSW.
$5000 is a large amount and you shold chase them.
If you want you could put the matter in the hands of a debt collector. They will chase the debt for you and take a percentage as their fee.
see http://www.profcoll.com.au/fees.htm for one such company.
I agree with Phil and Annaw2 in that it would be better to pay down your PPOR mortgage first and then borrow the money back before you invest. You will be saving interest and increasing your tax dedcutions if you do.
I don’t know about both of you being able to claim a PPOR. I beleive that each couple can only have one PPOR between them, and have even heard of people pretending they were separated so they could save tax (or evade tax?). You had better talk to an accountant about this, but you can probably claim a PPOR each up until you become a spouses (defacto?).
Some banks will allow dividends to be included as income if they are likely to continue. They are about stricter on interest tho. Some will include the income from interest in term deposits, others will not include it at all. If included it would be added to income.
Pisces, That wouldn’t work, because the moment you enter into a contract with the new purchaser is when it is considered a sale, not the date of settlement. It is the same as when you purchase, ie date of exchange of contracts.
Yes, GE Finance will also do 90% LVR low docs, but rates are over 10%. In these cases it may be better for you to be a wrappee, as the rate would be lower and the exit fees less. Exit fees on the non conforming lenders can be up to 4% of the loan amount.
Adelaide will do up to 80% LVR with mortgage insurance or up to 75% without. Same with ING. Suncorp will go up to 80% LVR with non LMI too. Then there is St George, ANZ that do low docs without LMI, but at a lower LVR – 60% to 65%.
You probably don;t have any savings or cash as you have been putting everything into your home loan??
If you want to go ahead, then increasing your existing loan or refinancing would be the best way to go. Saving up a deposit would not be an efficient way to go as you could be putting htat money off your non deductible debt.
If you used your equity in your own home to buy an IP in a trust by using a LOC, you would be acutally lending the money to the trust. the trust would pay you the same interest rate that you were paying the bank. So you net position would be Nil as incomming interest would equal outgoing interest. All profit would be retains by the trust.
Whoever said that may mean increasing the loans as the equity increases and using these funds as deposits on further cashflow positive property.
You could actually keep increasing your loans and using the money as tax free living expenses IF your property is growing much faster than you are using it.
having split accounts may attract extra fees, depending on the bank.
If you have a home loan still, direct all income into that account do reduce it asap. then just pay the interest on the LOCs (which you would be using for investment purposes). You cannot pay your home loan repayments form the LOC as this would be borrowing to pay back interest and principle on a non deductible loan. (actually you could do it but cannot claim the interest)
the limit is AUD $10,000, so us$9000 would be over.
but you could deposit whatever amount overseas, and then withdraw it here from ATMs. That shouldn’t show up.
If you wanted to make several deposits in Australia less than $10,000 than that would be an offence against the FTR Act, but it 4 transactions is not something very large!