I would rent to her at a lowish rent. To support yourself in case of an audit, keep cuttings from a for rent section of a newspaper, or an agents rental list to show that it is market rent.
My personal preference would be to keep the house and do what Steven suggested, ie borrow against it and use this as 20% deposits.
I have actually done hwat you suggested about selling a house to invest, and I regret it now. Don’t forget all the costs and hassles involved. real estate agents commissions, people comming to look, dealing with lying agents etc. And then when you eventaully purchase a new property, you have to pay stamp duty etc. Lots of costs.
You can arrange direct debts on LOCs wihtout any problems. So you can pay the interest ona another loan from this account.
Lenders generally want to see 6 months genuine savings for high LVR loans, but these days there are a few 90% LVR loans that do not require genuine savings. And from memory, there may even be one or two that allow 95% loans wihtout genuine savings.
That sounds good. Just buy a few properties, using 20% deposits. Go slow, build up more savings and go from there by buying even more. Set a goal of x properties per year. Work out what income you need, and then how many properties you need to meet that income.
of course. Everyone has to pay tax. How much will depend on how big the profit is. If the pensioner has no income (but i think the penson is taxable income??), then they can make $6000 profit and pay no tax. This may equate $12,000 profit before the 50% CGT discount is taken off.
When borrowing, all other debts must be taken into account by the lender. SO it will affect your application for a business loan, but being positively geared would mean that it may not be too bad as they also take into account all income.
(But most lenders take, say, 80% of rent, whereas the load the amount of interest you are paying. ie they factor in higher outgoings while decreasing your incomings!).
I think you will find that ‘main residence’ only refers to owned properties. Otherwise the rule would be redundant, you have to live somewhere, and if everywhere you lived was your main residence there would be no need for the rule.
There is an example in the legislation (ITAA (1997) Section 118-145) where someone goes overseas for 5 years and is still able to claim the original home as his main resdence. [Although, you could argue that he did not have an Australian main residence at the time.]
I have also asked a ATO tax investigator and he beleives you can still claim the other property as your main residence, even if you are renting elsewhere.
It only costs about $300 to set up a trust on the net plus about $300 more for the stamp duty. Going to an accountant will add a bit more. Doa search on the net.
Trusts will cost not much more to run than holding ivnestments on your own. Most accoutants charge a fee per property for example. If you have 10 properties in your name or 10 in a trust it won’t be much different.
I setup a discretionary trust for under $1000 and the running costs is very low.
Sorry Doggie, I am a mortgage broker not an accountant. If you want to lear about trusts, just do a search on the forum and buy the buy called “Trust Magic” by Dale Gatherum Goss. http://www.gatherumgoss.com.au
Imagine your trust had a $6000 profit during the year. Your teenage son takes a year off to go to uni and has no income. The trust can divert all the income to the son and no tax would be paid (by either). If the assets had been purchased in the name of a high income earner, they could have paid about $3000 in tax.
So even with a small profit you could save $3000 in tax. It only costs $1000 to set up a trust and virtually nothing to run!
You could do it either way. COC is just a measurement used to compare different investment strategies. Infinity is nto real meaningful, so I would calculate it as if using 20% cash deposits. You could be using these deposits elsewhere, so that is what you want to compare.
I beleive Steve uses a company to buy as Trustee for a Discretionary Trust. The income goes to the trust, as the company’s sole role is trustee. The income from the trust can be then distributed to individuals or another company so that the max rate of tax paid is 30%.
If you are moving out and renting you should be able to take advantage of the 6 year rule. You can still class your oirignal home as your PPOR – even if you earn income, and pay no CGT if you sell. Do a search for more info.
it is my understanding that you may need a valuation when you move out of your PPOR as it is CGT exempt during this time. The CGT libility begins accurring once you move out (altho there are some ways around this).