Many parents want to help their (adult) children financially. The common way they do this is to just either hand over a large sum of cash (or bank transfer).
There are 3 main issues to consider before doing this:
Bankruptcy of either parent or child
death of either
divorce/separation of the child
If the child ends up bankrupt the parent then argues that the money they transferred was really a loan. But there is no evidence of an agreement. There is also no security taken, so if the parent did lend the money to the child at best they would be an unsecured creditor.
Of course if the parent were to go bankrupt it would have been better that the money was a gift. In this case planning which parent lends or gifts can be important – perhaps the parent least at risk would be the better choice.
If the parent dies other family members may argue that the transaction was a loan. the executor may need to sue the child to recover the money so it can be passed via the will. If the child dies then the parent’s money may go via the child’s will to others – perhaps the spouse who could then remarry. You want some control. You also want to avoid costly legal fees if there is a legal argument of gift v loan.
Often when the child’s relationship breaks down the parents will claim the money was a loan and try to recover it. This is to reduce the chances of the money ending up with the spouse in the property settlement. Naturally the family courts are suspicious of these sudden ‘loans’ unless there is evidence.
Solution – decide before transferring if the transaction is a loan or a gift and document it either way. If it is a loan consider taking security – a second mortgage for example. You will then be a secured creditor.
You wouldn’t want to transfer it for love and affection as you wouldn’t be able to claim any interest. Asset protection issues too. You need to buy it for full market value.
They can’t. But a company they may control could pay them. Why do you want to pay yourself a wage? This is taxable in your hands. If you have a company that owns property and it pays you all the rent it will be the same, income wise, if you owned the property.
NEver heard of a bank charging for phone calls or faxes.
If they are fees charged by a lender then they possibly could be borrowing costs and claimable over 5 years.
Best to seek specific tax advice.
Sorry, you have sold your property. So these appear to possibly be fees in relation to the discharge of a mortgage and loan.
This reply was modified 10 years, 5 months ago by Terryw.
What you have said above doesn’t make sense. A trust cannot be a director, only persons can be directors. A trust doesn’t even have a director, but there may be a company which is a trustee of a trust. A trust cannot hold equity, but a trustee could take a mortgage over other property owned by others.
Not sure how this could leverage borrowing capacity though.
A person could rent a property owned by the trustee of a trust of which they are a beneficiary, but many issues to consider.