Forum Replies Created
Sounds like the sales person has already decided what you need before they have met you or know anything about you.
Sounds like your superannuation guy is looking out for himself too. What is his commission?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It would have been pre CGT, but subdivision would change this. It probably could be sold and the main residence claimed if they had lived in both sides of the house, it was rented for less than 6 years, they had no other main residence which they claimed and they moved back into both sides of the house and it is on less than 2 hectares and hasn’t been used to produce income other than described.
They need to seek specific tax advice.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Was that person a property advisor or a sales person in disguise? The differences is mainly the fact that the sales person has already decided what you need before they have met you or know anything about you.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
entire
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Here is a link to something I wrote explaining ‘all monies’ clauses. https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5025757-what-is-an-all-monies-clause/
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
If a borrower doesn’t pay the bank will take possession of the house, sell it, and recover the money they lent and the associated recovery costs. If they property is valued at $800k and they only need to recover $400k it should be pretty simple. Not sure why they would contemplate sending someone to london to investigate – even if you had hidden assets in London, they are not out of pocket.
If the mortgagee did do something totally unnecessary and unjustifiable you would be able to argue to have these costs excluded from your debt. This doesn’t make sense to me.You would have all the usual selling costs and legal costs which would vary depending how long it drags out – say $10k to $20k usually.
Yes the owner would get back any excess money – the mortgagee would be holding that money on trust for the owner until it passed back.
An unregistered mortgage isn’t indefeasible as it is unregistered. Lodging a caveat doesn’t register it, the caveat just notifies others there is an unregistered interest. It may give priority over other non registered interests though. To make the mortgage stronger it should be registered.
There is also a section in the bankruptcy act which makes contracts and deeds void, including mortgages, if they are undermarket value or done to defeat creditors. So would is the reason you would be giving a mortgage to a trust? You may use the gift and borrow back strategy. Gift money to the trust and then borrow it back but give the trust security for its loan. However then your gift is subject to the clawback provisions of s120 and also the s121 and even the conveyancing act -s34A i think in NSW – if you are trying to defeat creditors.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It would depend on how you are set up now.
PI loans can help
Related party loans can help
joint purchasing could help
sale of one or more could help – but consider whether you could borrow to buy the replacementetc
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
What does she fear about an ‘all monies’ clause?
If someone ends up bankrupt the bank can use its mortgage agreement with the borrower to secure all monies owed to it.So I guess you are asking if there is a second mortgage to a related trustee would the bank take priority over the 2nd mortgagee. I think that will depend on the wording of the clause, and the circumstances. It did happen in a NSW SC case Meldov Pty Ltd v BOQ [2015] NSWSC 378
But usually the amount owed to the bank would be less than the property value.
A caveat is just notification to the world that someone other than the legal owner also has an interest in a property. It is not a form of security like a mortgage.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
in the year 2000 these were going for about $150k. What are they selling for now?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
recalculate based on value.
not sure what you mean about selling. Land tax is paid for the full year in advance and you do not get any credit back if you sell mid year. But you can contract with the purchaser for them to reimburse you.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
lexd
Don’t see how delaying things would change anything.
I suggest you seek tax advice as you could probably pay off that loan, using the offset money, and start again. but before you repay the loan you must split it so you can repay the relevant portion. Splitting it can unmix it.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
e.g. You want to buy a $100,000 property, you could:
$80,000 borrowed from ANZ using as security the new IP. IO loan
$25,000 borrowed from Westpac using as security the PPOR. LOC
——-
$105,000
——-105% borrowings with no cross collateralising
Once settled convert the LOC to a IO loan.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Its like unscrambling an omelette.
it depends on the situation actually. You might be able to pay off the loan and then reborrow. But if you increased and existing loan you would need to split it first.
Seek tax advice.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Here is a thread where someone appears to have suffered a mixed loan:
https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4995626-redraw-conflicting-advice/Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Dinh, did you increase the investment loan and place any of this money into the offset?
If so you have contaminated your borrowed money, and you have also contaminated the investment loan.
See my other post which I just wrote where I warned about this.
https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/5025544-need-advise-cash-in-equity-through-loan/Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
A trust is a separate entity for tax purposes (not for legal purposes though). So any expenses the trust incurs it claims, including depreciation. A trust can negatively gear, but you cannot use a loss in the trust to offset your personal income.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Unless your mortgage broker is also a tax agent or a lawyer, they are not qualified to give tax advice.
s 8-1 ITAA97 will allow interest to be deductible where funds are borrowed to use to investment property acquistition. If you borrow and place that money into an offset account, there is no connection to the investing.If you later use that money you could argue that there is a connection and therefore that the interest should be deductible. But where you have borrowed in May16 and use the funds in say Feb17 there is a long gap between borrowing and investing. Can you still claim the interest – maybe, but you should apply for a private ruling to find out.
Also where the borrowed money is parked in the offset account and you already have money in the account, or you place other money in it later on then you will definitely have problems because the borrowed money is mixed with non borrowed. When you subsequently use the offset money to invest you cannot say you are using solely borrowed money, so at best only a portion of the interest will be deductible.
My advice, as a tax lawyer and a broker, is to
1. Use a IO loan where you can borrow to pay back into the loan and then later redraw when needed.If you cannot, then
2. Use a LOC. Once this is drawn down convert this to a IO loan.
If you cannot, do either, change banks
3. Use a IO loan with an offset. Borrow money and park in the offset and then repay the loan before reborrowing and using. This way the borrowing should occur when you need the money for investing.
Not ideal, but a work around solution.4. Least recommended is the borrowing and parking in a 100% offset account. But never put any other money in this account – ever.
If you want to do this I suggest a private ruling be applied for.Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It is very common to see $1000 put down as a deposit. $1 is not so common, but I have done deals where there is no deposit until the contract goes unconditional. So you would put down say $100 now with the remaider making up 10% when the conditions are met – subject to finance etc. And it doesn’t have to be 10%. COme to think of it I have seen the 10% paid at settlement.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
not a good idea to borrow cash and put it in an offset account as you could lose the deductibility of interest.
best to set up a LOC or an IO loan that you can draw down when needed.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Can’t come up with $1?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au



