Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 7,041 through 7,060 (of 16,328 total)
  • Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I have done this myself and seen many others do it – none have lasted beyond a few years. So from the begininning plan it assuming one of you will want out in a few years.

    There are a heap of issues to consider such as asset protection – what if the other guy goes bankrupt or a family law type claim and  his/her partner slaps a caveat on the property (- this can happen even if a company or trust).

    You will need a written agreement regarding the:
    – expenses
    – stamp duty on one exiting (does the remaining person pay?)
    – CGT (if u use a trust and one wants out ownership may not change so the remaining person may be lumped with it)
    – equity – how do you use it and when?
    – time – one may resent the other as he/she won't put in the same time, but expect the same split
    – changing loan if one wants out -can the other service?
    – what if there is a loss when pulling out?
    – initial contribution – who and how?
    – negative gearing – if one has a higher income he may get more tax benefits back – is this fair?

    Have a think about structure. Using a company as trustee may allow one person to back out without having to change the title. So much easier, but then you may have more land tax to pay and then the losses cannot be used to offset your personal income.
    If you use a discretionary trust then the trustee can distribute to the lowest taxable beneficiary – should this be done, or split equally?

    Loans – who guarantees the loan? 1 or both? using 1 may assist serviceability later, but does the person guaranteeing get compensated for their risk? If both guarantee and one leaves will he want to remove his guarantee?

    Many things…

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    One of the major disadvantages of a trust is that any losses cannot be used to offset your personal income. If you don't have any personal taxable income then this isn't going to be a problem for you. Another disadvantage is loss of land tax free threshold in trusts (in NSW and a few states). But you have probably used up the tax free threshold anyway and so this may also not be a problem.

    Just be careful about using HDTs – many were set up incorrectly and the tax aspects may not work. They may also offer little or no asset protection as the units are considered property and maybe available to creditors.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I think you need a QS or a qualified and registered builder to do an estimate. Or you could probably use the original costs – if you know. You shouldn't worry about the cost of a QS as it is deductible and they are bound to find many more items than you would on your own.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    In Australia different companies, trusts, smsf and individuals are generally separate entities for tax purposes and so the loss of one is generally not available to offset the income of another.

    If a company has other income it could offset the loss of a negative geared property against this income, but this would be extremely risky from an asset protection point of view.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    No love and affection are needed as this is for transfers between spouses!. There is no number limits listed in the legislation, so it should be unlimited as long as you can meet the requirements.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    If the mortgage is discharged then the security for the loan is gone. So if you get divorced or sued/bankrupted then you will have issues.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Unit trusts offer virtually no asset protection benefits and no tax benefits. But it may be a way for you to convert non deductible debt into deductible by selling to the trust – stamp duty will apply, and maybe CGT too.

    You also may be able to transfer the units without stamp duty later on, depending on the state your trust is established in.

    It may work for you, just make sure you ask some hard questions and know the facts before proceeding.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Well, you are only really transferring half the house so stamp duty on $220,000 which is the value of the portion transferred.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi M

    Thats good news about the CGT. But, may I ask, why would you buy using a unit trust? Did the accountant give you reasons?

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Ryan273 wrote:
    Terryw wrote:
    You wouldn't pay CGT, she would as she is the one selling. You would just need to pay stamp duty and loan fees.

    There is no spousal deals between sisters I am afraid.

    Terry, would you have to pay stamp duty on the value of the house, or half of that as that is effectively the share of the house as you already own the other half.

    I'm trying to crunch the numbers on my situation.. can someone please help me with this.

    Property value (estimated): $440K
    Loan: $275K
    Equity: $440K – $275K = $165K

    So I would need to refinance and pay out my brother $82.5K for his share of the house.

    Payout: $82.5K
    Stamp duty: $20K
    New loan amount: $377.5K

    So I would need to refinance the loan in the amount of $377.5K but this would leave me with LVR of 85.7% so I would have to pay LMI.

    – Is all interest from the new loan tax deductible, including the extra amount borrowed for stamp duty?
    – Do I have to pay stamp duty on 100% of the value, or just the 50% that I am buying off him?
    – Is mortgage insurance avoidable in this situation? Potentially I could refinance to 80% and pay him the rest separately? Can you see any pitfalls in doing this?

    It is becoming a really tough decision for me to make as going through with this is going to leave me in a very negative cash flow position (currently rented at $320/week) and will slow down my plans for future capital growth, plus the fact that I have to pay double stamp duty on the property which is ridiculous! I really think I should be hitting my brother up for stamp duty as I'm not the one who wants out of the investment.

    The other option is we take the house to market and sell and whatever profit is made I can reinvest that in another IP that might show better cash flow for me. My accountant has told me that since it was once our PPOR (around 3 years ago), and neither of us have had our name on another title we would be exempt for any Capital Gains Tax. Is this correct?

    Also, is this worthwhile going through these scenarios with an accountant. The bottom line for me is I don't want to be getting myself in a situation with significant negative cash flow that is going to impede further investment, but at the same time I can still see some really good capital growth in this investment.

    Help is appreciated!!!!! :)

    Thanks,
    Ryan

    For the calcs, it is up to you guys on how to split it, but you could probably assume it is being sold to a third party to make things easier to calculate or get your head around.

    Just divide everything in half.

    Sell for $440,000, pay back loan of $275,000 = $165,000 cash released = $82,500 each

    so you would give him $82,000 – but that is not including costs such as legals and loan fees. Should he compensate you for these or half because he wants out???

    If you have to increase the loan to pay him out you may be required to pay LMI too. Should he pay some of this??

    If the place is being used as an investment then the interest would be generally deductible.  THis would include the interest on money borrowed to pay LMI and stamp duty too. LMI may be claimable over 5 years.,

    You could be exempt from CGT under the absence from main residence rule, s 118-145 ITAA 1997.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    cmason wrote:
    Was discussing this with my lender yesterday, they don't have the concept of a Line Of Credit, for investors like myself what they do is create a standard IO loan draw down the funds and dump it in the redraw for you to use as you need, would this situation be different because the funds are put in the redraw instead of an offset?

    That should be ok, it will work similar to a LOC. If the money is withdrawn and placed back into the loan the balance will be nil. its like you have repaid the loan.  Then you later withdraw it when you need it and it will be new borrowings

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213
    Figc wrote:
    Terry I do not have a home loan. All loans will be investment. Does this change things.

    Hi Figc

    Yes, that would make things different.

    If you take money out of an existing investment loan the interest is deductible anyway, so you are not mixing personal and private. So there should be no issues with apportioning interest etc.

    Just watch out for the offset bit.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi Ryan

    You would only be transferring half the house so stamp duty on this portion only.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    nope.

    The equity portion will still be borrowed from the personal loan and this will be mixing business and pleasure. Also this may cut the connection with using borrowed funds. Remember interest is only deductible if the funds are borrowed. Once they are in a savings account they are no longer borrowings.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Yes.

    Ideally you should have a separate split on your loan for taking out the 20% deposit. If you don't you will be mixing business and personal loans and every repayment you make to your home loan will also be paying off this debt which will reduce your tax savings.

    There will also be issues with you borrowing money and placing into an offset. If you subsequently take these monies out and invest the interest may not be deductible as you may be breaking the connection between borrowing and investing – by placing in a savings account the funds will no longer be borrowed, but cash savings.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    It depends.

    In your personal names, then there is no asset protection.

    The greatest asset protection is with a discretionary trust. But the disadvantage with a trust is that losses are not able to be used to offset your personal income. However this may only be a short term problem as rents will hopefully grown. Once the property is making a profit then a DT will be the best for minimising tax payable as Evolve mentioned. This year it may be possible for an adult to earn up to $16,000 without paying tax – using low income tax rebates. So this will be a great savings.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    I think there are a few things to consider here

    Whether or not there is a mortgage you have borrowed money from your parents. If it is a loan it is returnable. So of they go bankrupt you will still have to return the money to their bankruptcy trustee. If you go bankrupt they have to chase the money from your bankruptcy trustee.

    Having a mortgage will help clearly establish it is a loan, and a loan agreement will establish the terms of the loan. If they don't take a mortgage they will be unsecured creditors. It is possible that someone could get ahead of them in priority and they may not get back the full value of the loan.

    If there is no mortgage it may also be harder to argue later, if bankruptcy happens etc, that this was a legitimate loan. When bankruptcy happens many argue that all sorts of loans where entered into with family members.

    If your parents gifted you the money then there may be issues with the claw back provisions of the bankruptcy act later on.

    What you tell a bank on a loan application may also come to light later on. So if you fail to tell the bank you have a debt to your parents and then later go bankrupt you will be arguing that you did have a loan, but the creditors will be arguing you didn't and they may be able to subpoena documents to show you never declared it.

    Also think about family law issues – if you get divorced or separated.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    Hi Newday

    good work,

    Talk to your tax advisor about your situation. It may be possible to leave it until your ppor is fully paid off – but this will also depend on limits to LOCs and products too.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    hi Reginald

    I don't own units myself, but would think you may have a value on your rates notice or will receive a land tax assessment notice.  Remember it is only on the land value and if there are 40 units, then each value will be very small. You may also get the land tax free threshold in some states.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

    Profile photo of TerrywTerryw
    Participant
    @terryw
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 16,213

    There is not enough boom boom in my opinion.

    Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
    http://www.Structuring.com.au
    Email Me

    Lawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au

Viewing 20 posts - 7,041 through 7,060 (of 16,328 total)