Equity available for use would be, keeping LVR at 80%: = (value x 80%) – (existing loans)
Crossing your loans will hold you back and not allow you to borrow any more. Best to uncross them asap, and especially become you buy another property and they become even more tangled.
I would be careful about getting the utliities in your name. If they don't pay the utility company will come after you, then you will have to chase them – extra hassle.
Hi steve, There's a lot of numbers there- i will have to sit down and work it out and post back later – bur for now i will answer your 4 questions. 1. Trust is quite simple- it's similar to a company, but the pit fall is WHICH type of trust you want to open and What structure/how – this will have a huge bearing in term of your tax and financial objective – you will need to speak to a accountant/ financial planer for this part. 2. The high LVR has started to come back. 85% LVR – no LMI. Any LVR higher- LMI is payable, but depending on which lender you go with it can be reduced by 50%. 3. I will need to work out your above number to see what your serviceability looks like. 4. $500 is over priced for a valuer, it's normally around $220 for a private valuer! can i ask whats the reason for getting a valuer? It sounds like your after a way to increase your rent-wouldn;t speaking to your agent who deals with this on a regular basis make more sense? Regards Michael
I have to say I think trusts are extremely complex. The tax law regarding trusts is vast and largely uncomprehendsible to the majority of accountants and tax advisors. The same with the law surrounding trusts. It is vast and complex with the average lawyer not knowing much about it at all.
I think many people don't even consider a small fraction of the things they should when setting up a trust.. eg Duties of the trustee..
It definitely sounds like you are trying to get maximum potential upside while exposing your parents to huge potential downside. You should make your first priority removing your parents risk in your investments before even looking at expanding your own empire. Also note that when your Aunt started building up a portfolio, conditions and prices were very different. What was working then won't work now.
This is exactly what I was thinking. Being a guarantor is extremely dangerous and with little benefit. taking on extra debt you are making this even more dangerous to the guarantors. I would work on taking them off as guarantors.
Terry does ' paid down the loan' mean the same as 'amount paid in advance'? So if I have paid in advance on a IP and decide to buy a PPOR and use the paid in advance money towards the purchase of the PPOR I cannot claim the interest even though the loan is tied to the IP?
Any deposit into a loan is a payment and any wthdrawal is new borrowings.
If you pay money in advance into a loan and then later take it out to buy a new main residence the interest on this 'new borrowings' will not be deductible.
have a look at this weeks newsletter at http://www.bantacs.com.au (no 222 from memory) as there is a really good article on this sort of thing
If your trustee is trading then it is a trading company – it is just operating as a trustee. The tax return is a separate issue. A trust will need to lodge its own tax return and the trustee company will also need to lodge a return, but if it doesn't trade in its own right then it will not have any income.
You can't backdate legal documents. And, even if you did, what about the ABN number for the trust, GST registration and TFN. Your trust will need these too.
If you keep paying PI you are locking your cash away in an investment property. This not only decreases deductions but prevents you from accessing that cash for private usage without adverse tax consequences.
eg imagine you had paid down the loan by $100,000 and then you decide to buy a new PPOR. You cash is locked away. You may take it out via redraw, but you would have to pay about $7000 in interest for this money and not be able to deduct it.
Now say you had $100,000 in the offset. This would result in the same interest, but when you want to buy your new PPOR you remvoe the money from the offset account and use it. You then will pay an extra $7,000 pa interest on your investment loan, but you will be able to claim the interest on this.
This strategy may save you $3,000 pa. over 25 years this adds up!
bit of a bee in the bonnet with Conveyancers today Terry?
Ha ha. Yes, my second post bagging them!
I actually am using a conveyancer for the sale of a property – but I am a solicitor and know the law so am just using one to to the actual conveyance – changing titles. Its not worth the hassle. But for the average person what if they need some legal advice along the way too, or what if something goes wrong?
Best to see a good accountant that understands trust law and taxation of trusts. A deed with a bit of advice will cost you around $1000. There will be additional costs for stamp duty on the deed in some states (NSW $500) and company set up if needed.
On going costs will be annual tax return for the trust – but this should not be so much more than if you bought a property in your own name. If you use a company as trustee the company will need its own tax return as well – nil return so won't cost much. You will also need to pay ASIC an annual fee of around $212.
Looks like you have been caught out by a sunset clause. This was in the contract when you signed and you accepted it. You would have had the chance to negotiate a longer period during your initial negotiations.
A property can't be your main residence until you have lived it in. So you would be up for CGT for the first 6 months. But, the growth during this time would be minimal and there are deductions to apply against any gain/loss so you may not have to pay any tax.
Thanks Terry for the information. It would be terrible to have to pay tax on the trust offset amount again. However I just thought of a disadvantage in "gifting" the money into the trust offset account. Basically that money will be locked within the trust from thereon and can only be "moved" between or within trusts, because say for example down the track if I needed that money for other personal investments etc then transferring the money out of a trust account to a personal account would be like personal income which is taxable (again). Unless the trust "loans" me the money by paying down its loan then redrawing and charging me slightly higher interest than its paying. Thanks Richard for the legal fee information, I had no idea about this as the banker made the process sound like a routine background/credit check nor did she mention any fees involved when we asked. Will let you know how I go. bb8
The trust could lend you the money back. Just make sure your trust deed allows it to lend money to a beneficiary.
If you own 99% now then you will pay 99% of the tax later. A property should only be negative for a short time and there will also be a CG (otherwise there is no point).