Forum Replies Created
- wealthcreation wrote:Thanks. So far I have understood the following steps from Richard's response – 1. Set up line of credit(LOC) with existing lender 2. After LOC is approved, use LOC for loan application with new lender 3. Demonstrate part of LOC as deposit towards next Investment with the new lender However, in my case, the order of events is bit different. I have already applied for the loan with new lender and demonstrated funds in off-set of my existing lender as evidence for deposit. Therefore, in this case, I am doing the following steps – 1. Put IP deposit amount from the offset into home loan which is Principle Place of Residence(PPOR). 2. Then re-draw/recall the deposit amount and spilt the home loan into 2 parts 1. Line of credit and 2. remaining home loan. 3. Use the line of credit for IP deposit at the time of settlement, thus create a tax deductible investment debt for 2 nd IP. Order is bit different. Is this sensible method to achieve the desired results ? I hope so. ??? Or rather I would like to think so. Any corrective inputs appreciated. Thanks. Cheers, WC
The 10% deposit is usually paid on exchange. how did you pay this? If you reborrow to pay for an expense already paid for then the interest would not be deductible. If you borrowed to pay the deposit you may be ok though.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
T
Should be just a one off application.Commercial loans may have a shorter term, but I don't think there would be any ongoing requirements to show updated income etc. You should ask your broker to confirm.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Who is the bank to tell you what structure you should buy it in. That has far reaching consequences for you that they shouldn't be concerned with.
Qs
1. Using a company as trustee is more flexible and safer. If the trust is sued the company will protection you and wife to a large extent. It is also more flexible. Say you want to hand over control to your son in 10 years. You and wife just hand over control of the company which is the trustee and no need to change title deeds on the property etc.2. Not like buying in a company in its own right, very different treatment in terms of tax and more flexible. eg. a trustee would distribute to the lowest tax payers to reduce the amount of tax payable. a company couldn't do this – it would pay a 30% flat tax rate
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Qlds007 wrote:Agree with Terry any commercially written book usually refers you to a Commercial written Trust which they have the patent on.Course financing a HDT in the current climate can also be interesting.
If you thought most Accountants dont fully understand them wait until you mention it to a Banker
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard
I think you will find there is no patent, but the name of a certain trust is trademarked. This makes it sound like a special trust with magical powers that only this firm has and many consumers have fallen into believing this.
Its like getting a trademark on the words "vendor finance". Anyone could do vendor finance but if the phrase is trademarked then others couldn't use the name.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi M,
Strange. Lets discuss over dinner monday? I actually arrive bkk at 3.30pm Thai time so will be around soi 4 by about 4.30 to 5pm.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
The appointor's role is usually limited to having the power to appoint and fire the trustee. Depending on the deed the appointor may have to approve of some decisions too. If the trustee hadn't changed then the trustee would have had all the power they needed to run the trust. I can't imagine the appointor would be liable for anything unless he/she/it gave personal guarantees etc.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Is this for superannuation purposes? I think it is defined under the SIS Act
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi M
My thai number is 08 56623852. I will be arriving there evening though.
How long will you be in Bangkok?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Where is the mortgage detective when you need him?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Thanks MWM
I will be staying in Sukhumvit area soi nana, and it appears to be above water still. Bit worried about getting there from the airport though.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi MWM
I will be in Bangkok on monday, where are you located? I am currently in Osaka on business and will be returning to Sydney after that.
Do you have a copy of the trust deed with you?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
There are no good books on Hybrid trusts. Don't trust the commercially available ones aimed at a general market as there are many incorrect stuff in them.
You will need to read legal books and tax alerts etc from the ATO. Try searching for Chris Batten too as he has a private ruling with the ATO allowing for the deduction of interest on his deeds. A good book to get on trusts is the "Trust Structure Guide 2011" but it is about $300 – it is available at some libraries (maybe later versions).
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
$50 duty for a transfer to a beneficiary under a will
s63 Duties Act
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/consol_act/da199793/s63.htmlTerryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I think your accountant may not have it all correct.
Hybrid trusts can work, but they must be set up in a way so as the trustee has no discretion whatsoever in distributing to beneficiaries while units are issued. This means to get the negative gearing benefits against personal income the trustee must be required to distribute all income to the unit holders including capital gains. So there would be no tax flexibility while units are issued.
Beneficiaries of a trust cannot be changed without adverse tax/stamp duty consequences. But with a discretionary trust the trustee can decide which of the class of beneficiaries to distribute to. (not in a hybrid).
There is little to no asset protection advantages in using a unit or a hybrid trust. This is because to get the negative gearing benefits the units must be held in the name of the person. The units are property of this person and would be available to creditors if that person went bankrupt. So the creditors would then get all the income of the trust.
Not sure what you mean by "you can pay into the trust which can then pay for expenses, entitling the usual tax deductions"
You should not have more than 1 director, usually, because it doubles the risk and decreases borrowing capacity.
The cost to set up quoted is very high.
There are other benefits with using a hybrid which you haven't mentioned:
– Units can be purchased back by the trustee of the trust and it can convert to a discretionary
– The trustee may be able to borrow to do this and claim a deduction
– Units may be able to be transfered to SMSF later without having to change legal ownership of the propertyIn NSW only fixed trusts can qualify for the land tax tax free threshold. A hybrid could be a fixed trust I think.
When a trust makes a CG the gain can be distributed as per the deed. If the trust is a hybrid with units issued then it would be similar to owning in your own name. If a discretionary then the gain could go to the lowest tax payers. Hybrids could also result in double CGT because the trust would pay CGT and the unit holder could also be required to pay CGT on the sale or redemption of their units.
Getting at the equity could be tricky if the hybrid is in the unit trust phase. I am not sure and would have to think about it. If it was a discretionary trust the trustee could simply borrow more money and buy more property or onlend etc (if deed allows).
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
No one is responsible to inform the new appointor of the death of the old. Death would trigger the removal of the person from the role and the next appointor would be appointed as per the deed – if there is one. If not successor appointor has been appointed then the trustee would be in control of the trust.
Sounds like the control your family's trust and other assets are being diverted to those who set it up. What state is the trust set up in and what state were your parents in.I am a solicitor specialising in trusts and estates so you could send me some more info if you want an opinion. You can get my email via pm if interested.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You must remember that trust assets are not your own assets. Trustees have duties to act in good faith etc to the beneficiaries or the unit holders of the trust. The trustee must keep all trust monies separate from their own personal money. If you have another family involved then you are leaving yourself open to a dispute down the track and it would be easy for them to show you have used trust money for your personal expenses.
Best to keep it all separate I think and then make distributions and deal with your money separately then
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
1
If you buy in a company you can get the profit out in 3 ways:
1. wages/director payments etc.
2. Dividends
3. Loans.Lots of issues involved and little flexibility if you are the shareholder. Your kids could earn $416 pa each and pay no tax, but hard to get the money to them with a company.
2
You will be leaving a large potential tax for your decendants. Companies can last forever however. so they could keep holding the properties. But the shares of the company have to be passed on when you die. There are lots of tax issues here.3. No. A company will limit liability. The shareholders cannot be sued and usually the director is not able to be liable (but can be sometimes) but if you are holding the shares of a company and go bankrupt then your creditors will get the shares and thereby control the company and all its property. With a discretionary trust it is different because a beneficiary would not have a fixed interest in the trust assets so the bankruptcy would mean the trustee just stops distributing money to you while bankrupt to stop it falling into the hands of your creditors.
4. Consider using a discretionary trust with a company as trustee. This will limit the liability if the trust is sued and also offers the greatest flexibility with minimsing tax
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Never a good idea to buy without seeking proper advice. If you buy before setting up the structure there could be 2 lots of stamp duty.
It is also not a good idea to buy in a company because the company will be taxed at a flat rate of 30% with no 50% CGT discount.
The best structure for something cashflow positive is generally a discretionary trust or a SMSF. You could also look at buying in a unit trust with the units held by a discretionary as there is extra flexibility with transferring the units to a SMSF later and extra tax advantages.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Firstly, you shouldn't be taking legal or taxation advice from a mortgage broker. There are many other issues involved too.
Secondly, why waste your wife's borrowing capacity? If you put her on title for 1% for future loans she will be assessed as owing 100% of the debt, but only getting 1% of the income. BTW, you can have her off title and on the loan if you need her (if your income is not enough).
Thirdly, think ahead. There will come a time when the rent exceeds costs and a profit will be made. If it is in the name of the high income earner then more tax would be payable at this stage.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
It is not a good idea to buy property through a company. Losses can be carried forward, but there is no 50% CG discount.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au



