Forum Replies Created
- trevj wrote:Hi,
Currently have IP in my name with significant capital gain.The wife has significant share losses in her name.
Is there anything i can do to offset the gains with the losses ?
I believe i can transfer the IP to my wifes name with no stamp duty but when this occurs does a CGT "event" occur at this point in time so that i would have to pay the CGT.
Medium term i will be selling this to fund house construction in Mt Waverleycheers
TrevIf only the house was owned in a discretionary trust!
Transferring to wife would be a CGT event. In VIC it could be stamp duty exempt though.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
This is the date for that the land tax in NSW is calculated on. So buying on 1 Jan instead can mean you have 1 year without having to pay.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
New year.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Anthony, Yes read that ruling and it makes it clear that it woudn't be possible.
I am surprised that this Fin planner put it in writing in his statement of advice even though it is clearly prohibited. he didn't know about that ruling it seems.
He has also suggested that my friend use the recontribution strategy to bring down the taxable component of his super. This is a good strategy as he has no tax dependants so his adult children will pay tax on any taxable component of his super that they receive as death benefits.
But the fin planner is suggesting he contribute $450,000 in one year by bring forward 3 years of $150,000. However my mate is over 65 so I beleive the bring forward part is not available and he will be limited to $150,000 pa while still working and under 75. Excess constributions can have serious consequences. excess can be taxed at 46.5%! $300,000 x 46.5% = a lot.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Boney
Don't forget to make sure you set up good wills – both and wife. Consider who you would want to be guardian of your children if you were to both die before they reach 18.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Business names are different to trusts. A name is not a legal entity and is really just a name. eg you can trade as ris4rob if you register this name – but the entity will be yourself. or you could set up a company ALB Pty Ltd and have this trade as ris4rob.
There are many issues surrounding structures with lots to consider. What you may be referring to is to set up a company and then have this act as trustee for a trust. This will not help you increase borrowing power, but should be looked into for other reasons.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi Anthony,
Yep, was referring to s 66(3).
I was just wondering because I have a friend who leases a land and has constructed a commercial builidng on it. A fin planner had suggested he sell building to his SMSF (but not the land). I pointed out that this would breach s66 and the business real property exemption wouldn't apply (lease cannot be transferred).
However if he were to transfer the building to a unit trust and then later redeem and issue units then i think s66(3) would prevent this.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Thanks Anthony. Very interesting. Do you think the ss3 about entering into a scheme could apply?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I don't know much about super, but am slowly learning more.
a SMSF is generally prohibited from acquiring assets from a related party. A trust or a company would be a related party. There is an exemption at s66 SIS Act for the transfer of business real property – but this would only apply to non residential property.
I have heard a strategy of buying in a unit trust and then transferring the units over to your SMSF on retirement, but think now that his will be caught by the restrictions.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
21 – minimise tax is number 1 for me.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi Wayne
You are in a bit of a problem it sounds. I dont think you would qualify for finance on those figures and that situation. You need to act quickly as you run the risk of not being able to settle and losing 10% deposit and more.
Quickly go and see a few more brokers to be sure about the finance issue. If you cannot get finance you may be able to end the contract and should see a solicitor about that. Another option is to try to onsell the unit before settlement. has it gone up in value?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
licence to occupy.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Sounds strange to me.
So a Borrowers Agent (BA) would charge the client a fee for finding a loan for the client. This loan would be the best option for the client with the BA unswayed by commissions or bonuses offered by the banks. The BA would then refund any commission to the borrower despite not receiving a commission so as not to be swayed.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi Greg
Yes, it must happen. but I agree that calling yourself a borrowers agent won't solve it
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You will also need to obtain a credit licence or become an authorised representative of a licence holder. You will then need an aggregator.
I don't think you need a cert IV and a diploma, just one or the other. (but cert IV usually is half a diploma).
I am a solicitor and just in the process on becoming a broker as well. I can make some suggestions offline if you contact me.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
So you are saying a broker 'works' for the bank and a borrowers agent for the client?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Ah, the legendary mortgage detective!
I am just off going to the doctor now, oops I mean my medical agent.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
wots a borrowers agent? Sounds like another name for mortgage broker!
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
propertyboy wrote:I purchased a house in victoria for 745k and with stamp duty and all legal costs etc it came to 780kWhen I do my tax, can I calculate the interest paid for negative gearing purposes on the whole 780k (if I took a loan to pay for everything) or only on the purchase price component of 745k? I am paying interest back on 780k.
My question is, for negative gearing purposes, can you only calculate the loan amount on the purchase price of the property even if the loan I took out was to cover all costs including stamp duty?
Did you borrow $780k or $745k?
You can generally claim all interest on borrowings for costs as well. But this may depend how the loan is set up.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
There is also the Limitations Act VIC to consider. It may be too late to bring a claim now – generally 6 or 12 years is the limit.
PB, have you seen a lawyer about this?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au



