Forum Replies Created
- Zabeel01 wrote:
I was told if the company was the trading business and trustee for the trust that the assetts were in, then the assetts were safe as we would be sole directors of a company that owns nothing & they can’t sue the Trust because we would be beneficiaries only, and beneficiaries cant be sued. Is this true?
This is a bit confusing.
If the company is a trading company then it owns a business. There would be value there such as goodwill and maybe some assets. If this company was sued, by a customer for example, then the business would be at risk. The customer could wind up the company if a debt was unpaid and the business would cease to operate.
If the trust was sued, such as a tenant suing the landlord, then it would be the company that is sued. A trust is not a legal entity so cannot be directly sued. The trustee is sued and then the trustee is reimbursed by the trust for any loss they suffer. So if a landlord sued the trust and won the person could get their hands on the assets of the trustee including the business and business assets.
There may also be a risk that the directors of the company can be sued. e.g OHS issues, unpaid tax etc. Maybe a tenant is killed by illegal electrical works authorised by the director. In this case the trust assets, the company's assets and the director's assets could be at risk – and the director could face criminal charges.
This is one reason to have only 1 director. Another reason is to get one spouse out of having to give personal guarantees to a bank – so if the property flops then only one of you goes down with the ship.
There is a risk that one director could act without the permission of the other spouse. Directors control the company and other spouse shouldn't be involved in the running of the company or they could be deemed a shadow director which would be the same as being a legal director.
If a director is sued personally, perhaps for something totally unrelated, then they could go bankrupt. Their assets would be gone, but the assets of the trust would generally be safe and protected (depending on a lot of ifs). But their shares in the company could fall into the hands of creditors and then the creditors could get hold of the trustee company and the business. The control of the trust could be rescued by the appointor sacking the trustee and appointing a new one. But a bankrupt cannot be director so another would have to take control. The role of appointor is not considered property and cannot fall into the hands of creditors (case of Burton from memory).
If a benenficiary were to go bankrupt then the creditors could stand in their shoes – but their only right over the assets of a discretionary trust will be to be considered for a distribution. The trustee would consider them, but not give them any money if it is going to fall into the hands of the trustee in bankrutpcy.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Zabeel01 wrote:Thankyou so much for answering!Can I ask you, as you seem to know your stuff, if the assetts are in the trust and the company is the separate trading business trading as trustee for the trust, does this still make the assetts available to anyone sueing?? And can we still offset our depreciation against our business income even though the assetts depreciating are in the trust?
I was told if the company was the trading business and trustee for the trust that the assetts were in, then the assetts were safe as we would be sole directors of a company that owns nothing & they can’t sue the Trust because we would be beneficiaries only, and beneficiaries cant be sued. Is this true?
Also, would you suggest just making one of us a director? Would this leave the other person more vulnerable? What would their role be?? Please excuse my ignorance!!
Thankyou so much for your time
Hi
Best not to have a trading company act as trustee for a variety of reasons such as:
1. Same legal owner of all assets. So if one is sued there will be a burden of providing the assets are held on trust for the other. eg. If the company is sued then the company may need to prove that assets it holds in trust are that. If the company as trustee is sued then the company will have a right to be indemnified out of hte trust assets. If these are not enough to satisfy the debt then the company is personally liable for the short fall – so your business will be at risk.
2. Trading companys will often need to give charges over their assets. Eg. a lender lending to the company in its own right or as trustee will require a mortgage over property as well as a charge over all assets of the company – used to be called a fixed and floating charge. This will complicate things if the company has 2 roles.
Trusts are treaded as separate entities for tax purposes. So if the trust owns an asset it can claim depreciation. If the company owns it then it will claim the depreciation.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
SMSF also provides the greatest form of asset protection available.
Maybe consider not selling. Borrow 80% initially, get it cashflow neutral, or negative geared after depreciation and then the new contributions to the fund may be tax free to an extent to – ie no 15% contributions tax if the fund is running at a loss. Keep saving in a 100% offset account (for new contributions) and once you have the 20% for the next property repeat.
Then when you meet a condition of release draw a tax free pension and sell the property CGT free.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Yes, it may be a good idea to do in your SMSF. Seek professional advice as things are tricky.
e.g. The SMSF must pay for all expenses. If you pay yourself then it could be deemed a contribution to the fund and this could result in you contributing too much for the year and the fund attacting penalty tax – excess contributions can be taxed at 46.5%.
SMSF may be able to borrow from members too, without mortgaging the property – eg you have a LOC and on lend to SMSF.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Don't think hanging onto it that long is really necessary. You just have to make sure the fund meets the "sole purpose test" and is investing for the sole purpose of providing for the retirement of its members.
Make sure you seek legal advice before setting up a SMSF as they are complex with many many issues.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I have seen people analyse things for years.
I had one friend who has a Ph.D and an IT background. He spent years looking at trusts so that he could set up properly. Then when he nearly set up a hybrid trust the ATO had issues with some of them and that through him and then 2 more years went by. Finally he started looking at property and did all sorts of spreadsheets and analysis and lost many a deal because of timing.
Roughly 10 years from when he started he finally purchased a property.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Yes you can. But the fund cannot borrow to fund the renovation.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
You are at risk.. Parternships should be avoided as you are liable for what the other person does.
But, you should seek legal advice because there are claw back provisiosn under the bankruptcy act. So if something does happen and you are sued and end up bankrupted then any assets you had transferred to the trust will be at risk of being clawed back for creditors.
You should also never own assets in a trading trust as if the trust goes down the assets of the trust are at risk. Use a separate structure to own assets.
And be very wary of using 2 directors. Directors often go down with the ship so why risk both of you?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
how strange!
So strange it is funny.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Its very dangerous investing in other countries and even more so considering it is Indonesia.
On the general investment side:
1. How will you fund this? Can you borrow in Indonesia? Unlikely to be able to borrow from a bank.
2. How about the tax aspects? Very complex when dealing with cross border tax issues. You will need to lodge a tax return in Indonesia and Australia – taking into account the Indonesian property too. So you have exchange rate calculations to deal with as well as the general tax issues such as is there a tax agreement between Australia and Indonesia? Finding a tax agent with knowledge of this will be difficult too. Expect to pay much more for your tax return.
3. Estate planning issues – you will need to look into doing a will in Indonesia as well as Australia. Will an Indonesian court accept a will drawn in Australia? Maybe, but it would have to confirm to the laws in Indonesia. Maybe they won't. What if you die intestate – with an invalid will maybe. What are the intestacy laws there? Who will benefit? What if you want to leave the asset to someone else and there is a statutory requirement that means spouse inherits automatically etc.
4. Getting legal advice there is difficult. You will get contradictory advice from the same lawyer on different days of the week.
5. You will pay stamp duty or tax to the lawyer only to find out a year later that the lawyer spent the money and needs payment again because the tax wasn't paid!
Then you have the general cultural and other issues:
1. How well can you read Indonesian? Can you understand legal contracts written in Indonesia?
2. Are you aware of how widespread corruption is there? Are you prepared for the bribes you will need to pay.
3. Are you ready for the "shakedown"? As a foreigner you will pay more for everything. Amounts will be added to everybill. Repairs will cost more, electricity more.
4. Are you aware that the legal system doesn't work the same as in Australia. Even if you have a court order it may be unenforceable. To get the court order you will have to bribe at every step along the way. The bureaucracy there is crazy. Even if there is no issues the process for any transaction is long and drawn out. You may have to provide incentives just to get the paperwork processed in a slow manner.
5. Different concepts of time. "jam carot' or rubber time means that if you organise a meeting at 3pm no one will come until 5 to 6 pm. They will blame the traffic, even if there is none. So you will have days and days wasted just waiting around.
I went to Indonesia a few years ago to assist an Australian man who had his property stolen – title transferred. He has a supreme court order to that he is the legal owner but the title still isn't in his control more than 3 years later.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
I have had a few email enquires regarding using trusts and not maxing out.
I agree with Richard, the only way it could work is if you can get different people to act as directors for each trustee company and you just be an un named beneficiary.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Ps. You can rate your own posts too (that was me giving myself the thumbs up above).
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
HI,
Sorry I havne't read the posts in this thread so some of these things may already have been discussed.
I am finding it much harder to navigate than the old forum. Some difficulties are:
1. No button to mark all forums as read
2. Replies show under the post replied to and not at the end, making it difficult to navigate.
3. No automatic notification of replies to threads where you have already posted.
However, I do like the "rate this post" button!
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
James sure knows his tax, check out
http://houseofwealth.com.au/home/
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Best to take your tax advise from a tax agent.
There is the market value substitution rule which which means that if you are not paying market value for an asset from a related party then the CGT will be calculated on market value. So the first element of the cost base, for CG, will be the value and not what you paid for it. see s 112-20 ITAA 1997
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Before you do anything best to get legal advice as there are a few tax and asset protection strategies you could implement.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Avoid 1 because of the tax issues – very dangerous.
2. Is ok, but is a separate issue. You would need to consider in conjunction with 3.
3. Is the way to go, ie a separate loan for the equity extraction. The rates are high though.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
dangermouse99 wrote:Hello AllMy accountant eventually setup a hybrid land trust ($3300), i really still struggle with it all, but just trust my accountants judgement. I just bought land in QLD and plan to put a house on it, it will be positive cash flow.
I have a wife who works part time and 2 kids, combined salary just under $150K and plan to buy more IPs down the track
I had drama's getting residential lending through CBA and eventually got commercial lending after alot of headaches
But I want to know some more, like teh tax implications, especially for my wife who wants to claim Tax Benefit A & B as I thinking being the lower income earner the asset i belive is in her name. what impacts will it have on us both
Why wuld he choose a hybrid trust and not like a family unit trust with the kids? And is this still going to work OK well considering the extra bank charges I have to pay including a considerable higher interest rate, all these costs and extra difficulties with the trust have been considerable.
I would like to know the pro's and cons of this for my own understanding. Can this be explained to me please as my accountrant is difficult to get a hold of and it be good to get unbiased opinions.
Many thanks
Dean
Dean, its a bit late to be asking these questions if you are already purchased the house.
Not sure what the reasoning behind using a hyrbid trust is, especially if the property is positive cashflow.
Not sure what you mean about "the asset in her name" too. Who are the unit holders and who is the trustee? Who borrowed the money and what for?
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Cunnin wrote:Just wondering if a Corporate trustee (company name) can be the same as the trust fund if possible eg XYZ PTY LTD trustee for XYZ family trust??Yes names can be the same. But it could be an idea to have different names to avoid confusion. I have one trust with the same name as the trustee company and it is a bit confusing when searching documents and computer files etc. When I get statements from the bank I have to think is it for the trust or the company etc.
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au
Hi Ella,
What is the question?
A spouse can buy out the other spouse's share, and if the property is in VIC it can be done on an investment property without stamp duty. CGT will apply.
It may be worth it to knock out the non deductible debt and to rearrange everything. ie a restructuring exercise
Terryw | Structuring Lawyers Pty Ltd / Loan Structuring Pty Ltd
http://www.Structuring.com.au
Email MeLawyer, Mortgage Broker and Tax Advisor (Sydney based but advising Aust wide) http://www.Structuring.com.au



