Transferring the ownership of property and refinancing triggers the following costs:
– property stamp duty on valuation (3.5% to 5% depending on value and State).
– mortgage stamp duty (only if you are increasing the mortgage amount as most State’s only charge on ‘upstamping’)
– mortgage registration and deregistration – $57 each in…[Read more]
Good question. The answer is that it depends on individual circumstances, strategies and objectives. However…
I0 versus P&I
Why not go IO all the time? If you elect to repay IO your minimum repayments are equal to the monthly interest costs. However, you can always pay more (most IO products allow extra repayments without cost – but…[Read more]
You might what to have a read of this article that was in The Age today… see http://www.theage.com.au/
Interesting question where rates are going to go. It’s hard to pick the top and bottom of a rates cycle. Lenders are still dropping their fixed rates so perhaps now is not the right time to fix. You may also like to read my article…[Read more]
Michael, I would like to echo Steve’s sentiments. I alway stop to read your posts (even on a Saturday night…). You seem very knowledgeable. Thank you for sharing.
I think a property portfolio need to be cash flow positive and exhibit capital growth. Obviously this can be achieved by purchasing a combination of pure cash flow properties and high capital growth properties (but my rule is that the portfolio MUST always be cash flow positive).
I’m pleased that you found my website interesting.
By the way, I have done the sums on LOC (and offset) products. They don’t save borrowers very much. At best, the saving might be 5% to 8% of interest over the life of the loan.
If you have used your PPOR and your IP to secure your IP loan then yes, the bank can foreclose on the loan and sell both properties to recover their debt. If the IP can stand alone (i.e. if the value of the loan is less than 80% of the value of the investment property) then it is advisable to vary your mortgage and release your PPOR.…[Read more]
Just as an aside – ANZ restrict the types of products that they will use if you borrow through a trust or company. Therefore you would have had to pay the standard variable rate. ANZ are not the best if your borrowing through a company or trust structure.
Wilandel – I’m happy to help you. I think I am…[Read more]
Hurricane – I think APIM is correct. The capitalised interest is not deductible. Therefore, from a tax stand point this structure is not really beneficial.
From a practical perspective I think its very likely that the government will legislate that capitalised interest is not deductible irrespective of the outcome of the…[Read more]
Yes, you can depreciate these items if they are used solely for income producing purposes. It doesn’t matter if the goods are second hand or new. The purchase cost of these goods can be depreciated over their useful life (which normally equates to a deprecation rate of 5% to 15% on a straight line basis – varies according to the whi…[Read more]
One of the lenders concerns about serviced apartments is that they feel that the value of the rental guarantee is reflected in the purchase price. That’s why most lenders will restrict the LVR on such properties.
In my experience the banks have always been a bit sceptical about these arrangements. They normally want to see these arrangements in place for at least a year and that the rental income is shown on borrowers tax returns as evidence.
As you can see it’s a bit difficult to increase borrowing capacity using these arrangements in the short…[Read more]
Property valuations for mortgage purposes generally have a tolerance level of plus or minus 10%. Therefore, a valuer would have to be convinced by strong evidence that the fair market value of…[Read more]
Most (if not all) lenders are very wary of lending in Melb CBD… This is always an good indication that it might not be a good buy (however there are always exceptions to the rule).