This not an easy one to answer. Some lenders will consider lending 95% but it really depends on the borrowers situation. If the lender is taking a higher risk on the security (i.e. by lending 95%) side of things then they will want to mitigate that risk on the serviceability side of things (i.e. you need to be able to easily be able to…[Read more]
Try and hang onto it (only if you are reasonably sure that there will be some capital growth in the short-term). However, if you are unsure about capital growth then I would sell.
$4,000 is not that much in the scheme of things. Maybe do some home based work. Get your de facto to assist the trades people in return for a lower cost of…[Read more]
The bank will consider your net income (i.e. gross income less expenses) as this is the amount of money you’ll have free to be able to repay the debt. The bank may make adjustments for some items (depreciation, excessive superannuation contributions, abnormal items, etc.).
I’ll have a crack (in the absence of anyone else).
1. 25% deposit for commercial – do you have this? If not then can use equity in your property @ 6%. Therefore net cash flow is $12,282 – $4,500 = $7,782. Commercials ok but you could probably get a residential at 10% yield. The good thing is the cost of debt for res. is much cheaper…[Read more]
Just to clarify… when Scott says “bends over backwards” [] he means this metaphorically not physically! [] Sorry, Firday afternoon, long week… time for some humor.
Terry – sub-sec 2 says if you use “part” of the dewelling for assessable income purposes… I checked my answer with the Master Tax Guide (but it has been known to be wrong before).
I’m email one of my tax nerd mates from KPMG and let you know.
Actually you only get a partial CGT exemption. You have to pay CGT on the time this property was rented out (sec 118-145). Here’s an example:
quote:You Acquire a property on 8/4/1992 and use it as your main residence until 17/8/1994. On 18/8/1994 you start renting the property out. On 29/11/2001 you sell the property. The partial exemption is as…
If you have purchased this for investment purposes then all you really have to worry about (with in reason) is the numbers. Is sound like you really like the area (which is great) but don’t let your emotions affect your investment decisions.
If the capital growth is good or if the rental yield is high then it…[Read more]
Just on the covering your risks thing… each syndicate member could counter indemnify the other members for their share of the debt. This would give you legal recourse should one member not meet their obligations. You could put restrictive clauses in the syndicate agreement that perhaps states members lose their share of ownership if they default…[Read more]
Return to your investment objectives and time horizon when you purchased. Did you buy for the long term? If so, ignore the short term volatility. As a long term investment I think Southbank is good.
However, if you purchased for a quick capital gain… it’s not going to happen. Cut your losses.
In short – yes, always better to divert all free cash flow to reduce non-deductible debt first. If you have a home loan then I would definately only repay interest only on IP loans.
Generally, the minimum P&I repayments (to apply after IO period) are already set out in the loan documents when you first take out the loan. So repaying principal will have no affect (but check with your loan docs).
Most lenders will let you roll over into another 5 or 10 year interest only period after the first one has expired. So you…[Read more]
Richmond – you already have an existing income stream so I would think it’s deductible. You may have to apportion between personal and investment (i.e. meals expenses, etc may not be deductible). This is a tricky area which I have not touched on for a couple of years (not until now when it’s become relevant again).