I guess you don’t have to split them up (as long as you can prove that the interest is deductible – i.e. it relates to investment properties).
I you advise you to keep them separate to make it easier if you ever sell any properties (also affects you loan flexibility – I address this in my net article in API – out mid March).
I would imagine that it’s very unlikely that this will ever get up. If the ATO loses the appeal than I would think the government would legislate against this to close the loop hole – they have too much to loose.
You have approx. $500k of debt now and you want to increase to approx. $750k which may be fine but you want to make sure you’re not over extending yourself. You’ll sart to get very rent reliant and you just need to consider the risk of vacancy and interest rate increases. Be careful.
And you need to borrow $20k + 2 * $250k = $520k. Is that correct. (I assume you have no exist loans against this property as you said “no finance required”)
Serviceability may be an issue.
I think its a pretty strong deal and you should have not problems so yes the properties title should be…[Read more]
If you’re borrowing over 80% and need mortgage insurance then you’ve got no chance.
However, if you’re borrowing under 80% then try CBA and/or RAMS. NAB has also done small properties in the past but their policies change almost hourly.
The HECS debt will actually reduce your net pay as your employer will be required to deduct HECS monies each pay. This will affect your serviceability and therefore borrowing capacity.
Potential profit = $140k (but this excludes financing costs, etc. so its probably a lot lower)
Given the risks (construction, selling, etc.) is it really worth doing this development (especially since you’ve forgone some of your profit already by…[Read more]
Sure its possible but the new loan will not be tax deductible because the purpose of the debt is to repay “non-deductible” debt.
It similar to borrowing against your investment property to buy a boat or a car. The purpose is to purchase “personal use assets” and therefore no allowable deduction.
I certainly wasn’t jumping up and down about Orix – just merely mentioning them as a lender that I know of that lends 80% against commercial property. I’m sure there are others as well.
Anyone that lends 80% is going to charge a high interest rate.
There are some lenders that offer longer commercial terms. For example, IMB offers a commercial loan with a maximum term of 20 years which can be helpful.
There’s a lender called Orix that will lend 80% on non-specialised commercial property (on a P&I basis).
I wrote an article about commercial finance for API magazine. I’m happy to email it to…[Read more]
I haven’t had a lot to do with these loans. Some require genuine savings and some don’t. Some investor clients of mine use these loans as a way of increasing leverage.
I agree with the Mortgage Hunter. There are some lazy brokers out there.
Make sure they compare at least 3 lenders (the comparison is good to get in writing). Ask them how they have gone about selecting the right lender. Ask them about the top 3 lenders for your situation.
They have all the information so just ask them questions and probe them a…[Read more]