Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 301 through 320 (of 1,712 total)
  • Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hey Sean,

    I went over to the States last November and started buying some US property.

    I spoke to Wachovia bank about the possibility of borrowing money, and the short answer was that it will be very difficult until you have a credit history and a banking history.

    You can go with 'hard money' lenders, but I wouldn't.

    Another option is to set up a structure with someone from the US as a director or member, and then use their SSN / history to help the entity gain finance.

    If I find out any other options I'll let you know.

    Regards,

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    6000 people reported out of work.

    Still, if it makes it safer and less of a rot, it's a good thing.

    I had a laugh when I saw a cartoon in the paper with the line "how can we sleep when our batts are burning"

    Classic!

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Agreed – too much 'soft spam' is flying under the radar.

    But you can help us! At the bottom right of each post is an 'angry' face. Click that and it will report the post as spam and we will investigate.

    Regards,

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi,

    Welcome to the forum.

    I haven't sold the Wrap Kit now for a few years. I still have all the files etc on the computer, but they are probably a little out of date now. It's also been many years now since I did my last vendor finance sale.

    You may have some luch on ebay, as I have seen a Wrap Kit for sale there from time to time.

    As for software, WAMM (from Darlop) used to do software for VF sales. Did a google search and they don't seem to be around anymore. Pity – Matt knew his stuff.

    You should also hunt out the Vendor Finance Association as they may be able to help you with your enquiry.

    Sincerely,

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    D,

    Nice try, but that's not what I am talking about. In your situation you are getting to a 100% leverage situation, and this will be tough to get approval for because when lenders do their due diligence in the post GFC environment, I suspect it will be identified and knocked on the head.

    Also, I'm not sure it would work out in the debits and credits in the underlying accounting.

    To start off with, in the books of Trust A:

    DR Asset (Property) $1m
    CR Loan (You for lending in the equity / deposit) $300k
    CD Loan (Lender) $700k

    This is a cash transaction, so the journal above also indicates the cash outlay and source of funds, namely:

    Cash In

    Loan (You) $300k
    Loan (Lender) $700k

    Cash Out:

    Property Purchase $1m

    Now let's say you set up Trust B and want to buy another property on the same basis. Assuming you could get a 70% loan from another lender ($700k), where is the other $300k going to come from? While you can 'loan it form Trust A', it won't be a cash transaction because Trust A doesn't have cash to hand over (unless it refinances the property, but how much more will be loaned because it is already at 70% LVR?)

    For example,

    TRUST A

    Dr Loan (You) $300k
    Cr Loan (Trust B) $300k

    <now Trust A owes Trust B>

    TRUST B

    Dr Loan Trust A
    Cr Loan (You)

    Overall Cash Position (Trust A & B)

    Cash In

    Loan (You) $300k
    Loan (Bank Lending To Trust A) $700k
    Loan (Bank Lending To Trust B) $700k

    Cash Out

    Property (Trust A) $1m
    Property (Trust B) $1m

    Cash Shortfall: $300k

    As you can see, all you are doing is transferring the loan to you from Trust A to Trust B and there is no cash movement. This means that you are still short $300k of physical cash which is needed to buy the second $1m of property (Trust B).

    As mentioned, you might be able to refinance the property in Trust A (say, up to 80% LVR), but this would only give an extra $100k, you would still need to find another $200k from somewhere else. You couldn't even x-securitize the property in Trust A as it is at max LVR.

    Overall then, and as I will outline at the upcoming get together, for this strategy to work you need:

    a) A source of cash to provide the 20% deposits that does not rely on refinancing or other debt. In my case this money came from realised profits as I sold property, and from good cash flow businesses

    b) You need to be able to demonstrate that you can service the debt.

    c) You need a strong asset position

    d) You need to source a lender who knows and understands what you are doing.

    Terry makes a good point about residential lenders. I deal principally with business bankers who operate with more advanced structures and situations. But business banking is not for the elite… it is open to anyone (or can be if you can write a business plan!).

    This has been a technical answer, and sorry if it has put some readers to sleep or frazzled them with accounting, but it sets out the nature of the transaction and the source and use of the cash needed.

    Regards,

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi Terry,

    I can only talk from personal experience. I have borrowed millions from many different lenders over the years, all with the same structure. This year I have borrowed with Bank West and NAB, and have had specific chats with senior personnel who are aware of the practice and are fine with it – indeed, that say that's how most of their high net worth clients work. Even CBA, who I didn't end up proceeding with on a project, were happy with the multi-trust structure with personal guarantees.

    The legal and practical difference between a guarantee and a debt in massive. I explained it in the re-release of the book, but I will also add an article about it to the website once it has been upgraded (new release should be ready soon).

    Healthy questioning is good as it brings out the debate. I certainly don't understand the finer points of mortgage broking, but am instead approaching this based on finding solutions to continue to access finance. I'm happy to keep fleshing this out.

    Regards,

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi,

    The essential point made in the book is not to 'hide' the fact that you are a guarantor, but rather to acknowledge that a guarantee is not a debt.

    I am yet to find any evidence that lenders treat a guarantee as the same as a personal debt. Instead, what seems to be happening, is that lenders are taking a much closer look at serviceability in general, and asking more questions than before.

    For example, when they do a credit check, any companies that you are a director of will be revealed. These days, lenders will now be likely to ask for financial statements of those entites to check your overall solvency.

    In conculsion, after speaking to multiple mortgage brokers and internal bank contatcs, I can summarise by saying:

    1) Since the GFC, lenders have become far more attentive to detail, and ask far more questions about loan applicants.

    2) Nonetheless, the multi-trust structure outlined in the book remains valid, albeit that more questions may be asked. In particular, a guarantee is not the same as a debt, but different lenders will asses that guarantee differently.

    3) The key determinant is (and has always been) demonstrating serviceability – that is, how will the loan be repaid? This speaks to your income and asset situation, and the stronger the better.

    4) In light of the new post GFC lending environment, it is important to ‘select’ the right lender as different lenders have different appetites to risk and investor profiles.

    I continue to use this structure across multi-lenders and am yet to strike a problem. That said, I am only borrowing 80% and can demonstrate strong serviceability.

    Regards,

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    It's hard to see how the cost of construction won't increase, and therefore builder's margins etc. will too.

    I suspect insurance will also increase (as the cost of replacement will increase).

    It may also lead to an increase in secondhand house prices generally (as it costs more to build new, people will move into second hand homes and increase their price), and an increase in rents (as more people are forced to rent).

    Of course, higher prices = higher inflation – higher interest rates.

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Lewis O'Brien.

    03 9888 6388

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi (again),

    Yes – first loans were P&I. In fact, most of the loans done in the early days were 80% LVRs as that is one of the ways that we borrowed so much money.

    In regards to wraps, see:
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com/strategies/wraps

    It's also explained in From 0 to 130…

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi Rob,

    Make sure you check out realtor.com, and search for the area of interest.

    The post-foreclosure (short sale) is an interesting option.

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Opusca1,

    In the early days is was P&I on the basis of 20% down.

    Today, I tend to be involved with more development projects where it is interest only, and the interest is capitalised into the loan balance.

    I'm still a CA… proud of it (just not practising).

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Angiebabe…

    Are you related to this site?

    It just seems a bit odd that you would join today and then post this.

    Is seems to me to be some seeding for something new.

    For what it is worth, what I'd like to know are:

    a. Are the original listing prices genuine? If so, are they independently verified, or is it up to the agents to input?
    b. How much is paid for listing the property on the site?
    c. Why are there so many google ads on the site? Makes it look a bit dodgy.
    d. Who are the people behind the site? On the 'about us' site it doesn't mention names.

    This whole thing seems a little odd.

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi,

    You won't find $1m in Property… in stores anymore as it is out of print.

    You might get a copy on ebay.

    Suggest you get the revised 0 to 130 which has just been released. Should be in bookstores from this week.

    Also recommend you read:

    * Rich Dad Poor Dad
    * Richest Man In Babalyon
    * You Can Do It
    * Money Secrets Of The Rich

    All the best with your investing.

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    I've a couple of thoughts to add here:

    a) 1 Br Apartments. These are the bottom of the market and hence are attractive to those seeking affordability. As such, they are likely to underperfom the median house price growth and rent. If you can, you are better off with a 2br second hand apartment than a new 1 br apartment.

    b) How do you plan to make money from this investment? Growth, Income or Both? It is smarter to start with your profit and work backwards to your property, than to start with your property and work forwards to your profit.

    c) You are right about the hidden costs. Be careful with body corporate, leasing charges, extras (pool, gym etc), carparks, noise (check construction for soundproofing), stairs / access (impacts rental if hard to move in and out – ground floors tend to rent for more unless there is a view).

    d) Finance – make sure you shop around for a financier as some will not like apartments less than a certain size.

    Food for thought. All the best,

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi Bronte,

    It's uncommon but not unusual to rent the property before settlement for the sake of getting early access.

    Sometimes no payment is needed, just agreeing to take the property as it is now, and to pay for the rates etc. from now on, plus insure the property.

    An experienced property solicitor will be able to help you.

    All the best and congrats on the purchase.

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Hi,

    I agree with other posts about needing the preliminaries sorted.

    That said, you have a goal and if you lack the funds it is smart to invest with others. Make sure you have each role defined though, as if you are all doing the same thing then it will cause arguments.

    Open communication among the partners is the most important requirement. Common goals and expectations are also critical. For example, be careful if one party contributes more time or money than others. This will be acceptable in the short term but will cause tension in the long term.

    As for a structure, unless you are related a family trust will be out. Therefore, alternatives to explore are:

    a) A unit trust (where the units are owned by the three parties)
    b) A partnership of family trusts (each party has their own family trust)

    As has been said, best to see an accountant to discuss your specific needs and what fits best.

    All the best,

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Okay… finally recovered from lots of hot crossed buns. Thanks for your patience.

    Seems Qantas has jumped on the unemployment bandwagon. Interesting how these things build momentum… I wonder which major corporate will be next.

    First up, please remember that my thoughts are just one of many opinions. You will need to take and leave what you feel makes sense.

    1. Overvalued Property

    By historical standards, based on times earnings, the property market in the US, UK and Australia appears overvalued against the long term trend. Certainly, prices in the US and UK have come off, but here in Australia we are yet to see a major fall.

    The major distinction economists believe is the reason for housing stability here are:

    a. Government stimulus – in the form of the FHOG, savings accounts etc.
    b. Housing shortage

    My response to this, as I mentioned at the info night, is to avoid being a growth investor (as delivered by general market growth) as the downside of prices slipping is not worth the upside of potential price growth.

    However, I remain a fan of positive cashflow investing, and for lump sum gains earned from developing and renovating property.

    2. Yield

    The purpose of the examples used is to show how the 1% rule works to quickly filter deals that might be positive cashflow from deals that are not. Deals that stack up need to be evaluated further to test the key assumptions.

    Whether or not a return is 'good' depends on what other opportunities an investor has, as well as his/her skill or expertise.

    Surely a 6% return (that will be +ve cashflow) is better than a negatively geared return in a low growth environment.

    3. Sydney Property Prices

    The death of Sydney property prices was proclaimed when the Carr government changed the land tax rules, and has failed to recover since. It was timed at the peak of the cycle, and by the time it was reversed, a new momentum had been established.

    However, you simply can't argue that low interest rates fail to ignite the property market, as it is a question of if, rather than when.

    Already yields are improving, however the problem now is being able to borrow money given credit has tightened.

    I hope my answers have shed further light on some of the issues.

    Thanks,

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Happy Easter!

    I am about to sign off for some family time, but will be sure to answer this post on the other side of Easter.

    Regards,

    – Steve McKnight

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

    Profile photo of Steve McKnightSteve McKnight
    Keymaster
    @stevemcknight
    Join Date: 2001
    Post Count: 1,763

    Reviving this post….

    Although interest rates have fallen, clearly the gloom is placing pressure on property prices.

    The near term prognosis remains gloomy, which is why I continue to recommend trading in and out, rather than buy and hold.

    Just because something is cheap does not mean that it is good.

    Cheers,

    – Steve

    Steve McKnight | PropertyInvesting.com Pty Ltd | CEO
    https://www.propertyinvesting.com

    Success comes from doing things differently

Viewing 20 posts - 301 through 320 (of 1,712 total)