<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | splosh | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/splosh/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/splosh/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for splosh.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 19:20:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">635ca021c6af3fda403451478b9cec60</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic what you don't know about "the Secret" in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389168-what-you-dont-know-about-the-secret/page/3/#post-4565618</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:47:00 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is not too busy visualising abundance, or whatever, and up for a good laugh, try this link.   One guy&#039;s humourous foray into a tony robbins motivation seminar.  <a href="http://www.apologeticsindex.org/s51aa.html" title="http://www.apologeticsindex.org/s51aa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apologeticsindex.org/s51aa.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">fc0375000d87c8cff1dce0cad3184e66</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic How can we Convert a (-) geared property to (+) in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4388352-how-can-we-convert-a-geared-property-to/#post-4561736</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 07:49:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by foundation:</i><br />
<i>Originally posted by splosh:</i><br />
You could simply&#8230;</p>
<p>[stun]</p>
<p>Simply? Wayne&#8217;s a lucky bloke if he has a lazy $225,000 sitting around that he can plonk into his loan!</p>
<p>Yes, tounge was planted somewhat firmly in cheek, &#8230;.but seriously he could possibly sell another IP and consolidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b3bb60787fa69b22fc356e4e09548e3a</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic How can we Convert a (-) geared property to (+) in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4388352-how-can-we-convert-a-geared-property-to/#post-4561734</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 01:58:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could simply pay out half the loan and that would halve your interest bill making it cash flow neutral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b81ab202d9a23d211ccc6cb47dfa8d98</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic int rate 17% in 1990 in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4387033-int-rate-17-in-1990/#post-4555740</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 03:18:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by JohnSmith:</i><br />
I would also add that it is Australians love of property that is helping to keep its population wealthy.</p>
<p>[baaa]<br />
hahaha that&#8217;s Gold! We should extend this love to other asset classes and we could all be even more wealthy!</p>
<p>How about air? We all need it, they arent making any more of it.. so lets all love it and&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-34007"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4387033-int-rate-17-in-1990/#post-4555740" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dbfac92c1e1ceb7f965aef8072577050</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic What type of vehicle do you have ?? in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4381491-what-type-of-vehicle-do-you-have/page/9/#post-4524811</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 00:38:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An early 80s road bike. It has only one speed and has only a front brake. It is very fast, efficient, low maintence and helps keep me fit. It cost about $250 dollars to build &#8211; most of the cost was in the tyres.</p>
<p>Faster than a car for most trips in metro Melbourne, and spanks most other bikes on the road.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c0f23169f2b006fdb7b11e60f14b5e20</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic Property bust not here yet ... worse to come in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385726-property-bust-not-here-yet-worse-to-come/page/3/#post-4548470</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 01:48:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by gmh454:</i></p>
<p>Foundation may be able to help me here but there was a significant Russian economist in the early 1920s who came up with cycles within cycles and charted them not back to the 19th Cent but the early 18th Cent.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kondratiev_waves" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kondratiev_waves</a></p>
<p>gmh is this what you&#8217;re referring to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">14ddc16c0c5624befb406f69ff96aab3</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic Is anyone doing it tough? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385170-is-anyone-doing-it-tough/page/2/#post-4545926</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 02:16:21 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Originally posted by foundation:</i><br />
<i>Originally posted by brucemarg:</i><br />
Most of them will need to rent our properties a lot longer than they intend.  The &#8216;now generation&#8217; is great for us who have considered tommorrow and don&#8217;t want to be working then.<br />
Just who are you lumping into this &#8220;generation&#8221;? And are the responsible, debt-conscious, youngsters&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-170177"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385170-is-anyone-doing-it-tough/page/2/#post-4545926" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2681f7c1b15b91bf1a928375c04b4715</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic Is anyone doing it tough? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385170-is-anyone-doing-it-tough/page/2/#post-4545922</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2006 03:05:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a member of this younger generation who have only seen the upside of things, but I actually think in a way we are actually doing it tough compared to the last few generations.</p>
<p>Sure.. luxuries are very very cheap compared to what they used to be just a few years ago, but guess what? The necessaties such as housing are more expensive.</p>
<p>Look at&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-170173"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385170-is-anyone-doing-it-tough/page/2/#post-4545922" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">1e9866fa350d67e51500b5307c81a103</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic Doom and gloom from OECD report in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4383382-doom-and-gloom-from-oecd-report/#post-4536466</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 07:17:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s the actual report&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/56/35756053.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/56/35756053.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">3d6eb5de8978769a6b1dd91c6313a983</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic ADVICE NEEDED - Private Tenant wants bond reciept! in the forum Help Needed!</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382756-advice-needed-private-tenant-wants-bond-reciept/#post-4533022</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:55:35 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Victoria I understand that if you don&#8217;t register your bond with the RTBA you can be fined an amount comparable the the FHOG. Might want to think about that too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c525a146b086af74db54b42e498bfef3</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic Why a House Price Crash is GOOD for your Wealth! in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380435-why-a-house-price-crash-is-good-for-your-wealth/#post-4517652</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2005 02:00:47 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I care..</p>
<p>Perhaps I am naiive, but I have always thought that a low cost of living was a good thing. I thought a low cost of living meant high wealth. Good for individuals and good for communites as a whole. I thought this was all fairly self evident.</p>
<p>So I was surpised to learn a few years ago, that not only there were people who thought rising&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-193298"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4380435-why-a-house-price-crash-is-good-for-your-wealth/#post-4517652" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">598c7e67ba8b111608869bbe88946331</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic How to work out today's $$ in tomorrow's $$ in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4372869-how-to-work-out-todays-in-tomorrows/#post-4467366</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:42:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
<p>use the ol compound interst formula:</p>
<p>p x i^n</p>
<p>p=principal<br />
i=interest per year (or time period for which interest is calculated)<br />
n=number of years</p>
<p>So in ten years the equivalent of 100k, assuming 2%pa change is:</p>
<p>100,000 x 1.02^10 = 121,899.44<br />
[buz2]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d0e9c26d6021c686196fdf37228850fe</guid>
				<title>splosh replied to the topic How to work out today's $$ in tomorrow's $$ in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4372869-how-to-work-out-todays-in-tomorrows/#post-4467365</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 04:39:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
<p>use the ol compound interst formula:</p>
<p>p x i^n</p>
<p>p=principal<br />
i=interest per year (or time period for which interest is calculated)<br />
n=number of years</p>
<p>So in ten years the equivalent of 100k, assuming 2%pa change is:</p>
<p>100,000 x 1.02^10 = 121,899.44<br />
[buz2]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 2/359 queries in 0.103 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-12 05:23:12 by W3 Total Cache
-->