<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | skatz | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/skatz/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/skatz/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for skatz.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 06:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">305cd90e7d9f9e78cf37140a18855b09</guid>
				<title>skatz replied to the topic Tenants Have 2 dogs, no fence in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531546</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 13:29:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi calvin@thirty4, Your dog device sounds identical to the one I looked into, sounds like NSW LEGISLATION has changed since you bought yours. The problem here is that a tenancy agreement is likely invalid if contrary to STATE legislation. It sounds like an excellent device to me.</p>
<p>skatz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c9989770c1dae999e0eab063219fa72b</guid>
				<title>skatz replied to the topic Tenants Have 2 dogs, no fence in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531544</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 23:35:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EllyH:	I spoke to &#8220;Sureguard&#8221;, the designer of the product informed me that NSW legislation<br />
states that the device (*) may be used inside a fence through which animals cannot pass and<br />
that it is not less than 1.5 metres high.&#8221; Kinda makes the &#8220;device&#8221; superfluious extra!<br />
* I believe the device referred to is any &#8220;shocking&#8221; device including the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-87821"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531544" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7d88ec2ea8ce9aaec9019c9766d73a6b</guid>
				<title>skatz replied to the topic Tenants Have 2 dogs, no fence in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531542</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 01:09:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi EllyH<br />
There could be an issue with Prevention of Cruelty to Animal Act NSW (checking now)<br />
otherwise the Radio Collar Dog Fence sounds better than a fence (plenty of dogs jump 1<br />
metre high fences anyway, or dig under)<br />
thanks<br />
skatz</p>
<p>skatz</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f3dd9c2ca9e0a5ac19f1b02cc046d4ba</guid>
				<title>skatz replied to the topic Tenants Have 2 dogs, no fence in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531540</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 23:13:53 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Response 2:<br />
Harley2 : I had same idea but thought upping rent for dogs would be top rent I would get,<br />
but the fence plus perhaps a longer contract period is worth considering.</p>
<p>Harley2 : &#8220;Smell of dog faeces in yard in summer disgusting.&#8221; NOT GOOD!<br />
If the contract limits them to two dogs, no pups, and the dogs are small, I wonder how&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-87817"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531540" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8daf13516b08ee5ffd41150a94a86a19</guid>
				<title>skatz replied to the topic Tenants Have 2 dogs, no fence in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531536</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:25:16 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[blush2]Thank you every one for the replies,<br />
my response 2 your queries and comments:</p>
<p>g7: 	One&#8217;s a small (Jack Russel) and a medium (wippet),<br />
they appeared to be placid, friendly and well behaved.<br />
Yes, you do wonder if someone else at DFT would give the same answer.<br />
The thing is that there is an obvious niche for rental house that allows dogs.&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-87813"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4382532-tenants-have-2-dogs-no-fence/#post-4531536" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 330/350 queries in 0.065 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 16:09:19 by W3 Total Cache
-->