<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | silhouette | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/silhouette/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/silhouette/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for silhouette.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 19:22:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e7b83d6f25645461a2fe87817e2fd7b0</guid>
				<title>silhouette replied to the topic 11 Second Solution - Mach 2 in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385498-11-second-solution-mach-2/#post-4547468</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 06:40:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hardly think they are seriously flawed&#8230;the maths still work.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I got 2% on a mortgage (like never) &#8211; still, if you can get 2% and can get a IP at $177K  rented at $295, that would give you 8.6%; or if you paid $265K at 8% then the return is around 5.7%.</p>
<p>So, as I said in my original post &#8220;Not great but not too bad in the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-239871"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385498-11-second-solution-mach-2/#post-4547468" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">869996796ce2dc4ff9b8b224db036759</guid>
				<title>silhouette replied to the topic 11 Second Solution - Mach 2 in the forum No Subject</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385498-11-second-solution-mach-2/#post-4547461</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2006 09:00:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a good question and I haven&#8217;t found it anywhere here!</p>
<p>I think you will find it is still the best rule of thumb to ensure you are cash positive.</p>
<p>However as some of my investments in the current climate are not this way &#8211;  I use another variation &#8211; which might be considered the 11.578 second rule.</p>
<p>$rent / 2 x $1000 x your best bank interest&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-224383"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4385498-11-second-solution-mach-2/#post-4547461" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 246/348 queries in 0.072 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 05:31:32 by W3 Total Cache
-->