Forum Replies Created

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 65 total)
  • Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by gafama:

    It’s my understanding that if you have a property investment entity (coy, trust) then you can claim but if it’s just you then it forms part of the “acquistion” cost of a property (like stamp duty) and goes towards the cost base when (and if) you sell for CGT purposes.

    Check with your accountant – they may have an alternative method.

    Megan

    http://www.propertyhub.net
    Your Investing and Developing Information Hub.

    This is the advice I’ve been given and what I’ve acted on. I’ve been told that a trust can pay an individual to source a property for it ( including yourself ) however I havn’t checked this out todate.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    Some mortgage brokers will have access to RP data so if you’re using one , you should be able to get the info off them.

    Also if you’re good friends with an REA they may be able to help you.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    All the people who I know ( myself included ) who have bought in Rocky ( in 2003 ) are in profit taking mode at the moment. I don’t know anyone who is buying there at the moment. I would be very much suprised if you could get cash flow positive properties.

    There is a long thread on Somersoft re Rocky

    http://www.somersoft.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11656&highlight=Rocky

    At the prices we bought two years ago , our properties were not cash flow positive ( though we bought ” nicer ” properties than many people I know who bought there at the time. We have made a good capital growth , but looking at past historical data , when Rocky stops it seems to stop and go back fairly quickly so I was happy to get out while the market was reasonably strong ( which I think it is ) before it peaks.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    Michael has been around and knows what he’s talking about.

    If you want to read up about the property cycle ( though he won’t and can’t tell you when the next cycle will begin ) you might want to read a book by Kieron Trass from NZ.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/sim-explorer/explore-items/-/0143019430/0/101/1/none/session/ref%3Dpd%5Fsxp%5Fr0/002-1470859-1159219

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    If you want to check out what is on the ATO hit list , havea look here.

    http://www.ato.gov.au/atp/

    Hybrid trust seem to be the way many are going , so some legal people have expressed concerns that they may not offer as much protection as a standard trust.

    Main advantage is they able you to negatively gear. If you don’t need that or anticipate needing it , then it’s probably not worth it.

    Nick Moustacas at Strategic Wealth management is another person who deals with Hybrid trusts. I have seen him but not in relation to hybrid trusts.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    Michael

    Following on from where I suggested you can cash up when the market has peaked, my aim is to start buying in at a point where I see absolute bargains.

    Now if I keep buying whenever I can afford to ( as suggested by some ) and maintaining a higher LVR , when the market comes to a point where I want to start buying again , the odds are that interest rates will be higher, values will have come down, and the banks may have tightened up their lending criteria. As a result I may not be able to borrow the money that I want to in order to buy the bargains, or if interest rates are higher, I may not have the cash flow to maintain the loans and maintain a nice life style .

    What would I class as a Bargains ? Well as I believe the next cycle , like all others before it will start near the centre of Sydney , in order to gain maximum benifit , that’s where I’ll be looking. I know people who have bought well positioned properties at 50 % of their peak price in the preceeding cycle. In 94 I saw ( without know much about investing ) well positioned properties ( mid north shore , east side walk station ) that were selling around 60 – 70 % of the value they had sold for in the previous boom in the late 80’s. Those properties have more than trippled from that price now , though they’re on the way down now…

    At that stage I would even toy with getting a cash bond inorder to improve my servicability if I could by more in comfort. :)

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by surreyhughes19905:

    One person’s excess bedrooms is another’s home office, media room, dark room, hobby room, guest accomodation, storage room, parent sanctuary…

    4 bedroom houses will always have a demand even if you have to re-label them as 2 bedroom + home theatre + study… It’s the size and space that attract money, it’s the exchange of abstract resource for leveragable resource that makes us wealth.

    [biggrin]

    we have 6 ” Bedrooms ” one is a study come office and another is an X-Box room .

    Parent retreat …. [baaa][biggrin]

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by Terryw:

    What is the alternative to living off equity?

    It would probably have to be selling a property. If you were to sell a property you will lose all future capital growth of that property and will also have to pay various costs. Surely this is cooking the goose (and not drawing down the capital).

    However, if you were able to keep the property and to use some of the equity, you would also be able to access future capital growth as well.

    This stategy may not suit many people, but it can help other people stop working sooner than expected. On another forum, a person commented that they were able to ‘retire’ from work (before 30) by using this strategy. This freedom from having to attend work everyday enabled them to concentrate on property and they then made more money doing up property in the 1st year than they would have made working for that year.

    Terryw
    Discover Home Loans
    North Sydney
    [email protected]

    I think people need to adopt a more flexible approach to their investing. eg Gear up to high LVR’s when the market is about to take off, then cash up some properties , and lower your LVR when the market is peaking , or has peaked . In my experience the property market moves slowly enough to enable one to do this, though you may have to accept 5-10 % below the peak price when you sell.

    This can give you a smaller but genuinely cash flow positive portfolio, which you can use to fund purchases in the next cycle , and so on.,

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by redwing:

    would you sell for 85% of market value?

    IMHO in most cases anyone who thinks of selling will then look around for prices in the area, pick up the paper and have a look (community papers are free so it doesn’t even cost anything and shows houses in the area) or at least speak to a REA about what thier houses are worth.

    REDWING

    Most people ( IMHO ) who sell a house do minimal research and don’t have much idea on what their house is worth.

    We’ve done this ( Flyer ) and picked up one good buy and missed out on a better one because I didn’t move fast enough. Did it all long distance, buying in Townsville while living in Sydney and bought subject to inspection.

    The buy was a good one ( probably 10 % below market ) , but Townsville was already taking off at the time so I was happy with that. The main reaons to do it was to see how it worked.

    In the Flyer I didn’t put down that I was an investor . I said I was looking for a family home ( I was , but to rent , not to live in ). I was very carefull to make sure everything I wrote or said was truthfull, though it wasn’t the whole truth , but what adds are . I did make the point about avoiding realestate agent fees, but I didn’t make any judgement comments about agent fees though. I deliberatly wrote the flyer so that it didn’t sound like a sales pitch / add but more like a conversation.

    I had a mobile number on the add, and most people thought I was a local.

    About 1/3 of the replies were people curious about what I was doing, probably including some agents , 1/3 were people who wanted to sell their property for an over the top price, and about 1/3 were people who were of interest to me.

    These tended to not trust agents and thought they knew the market very well, though they weren’t aware that the market had taken off in the preceeding months [blush2] I asked them what they wanted for their house and at no time resorted to heavy ” negotiation tactics “.

    I will do flyers again , however if the market is dead, I would take a different line , along the lines of I am a Investor prepared to pay cash etc….along the lines of what you are talking about.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    Michael

    For me the problem with Living of Equity is what happens if the unexpected happen ( well maybe not unexpected by some )

    To draw down equity you are assuming that the way the banking system will allow you access to you equity in terms of increasing the equity you can access . I would hate to be at 70 when there’s a recession, prices gone down for a few years ( that does happen :) ) and the banks decide that the latest fade of Living of equity has got them nervous , so they not only decide to revalue all my properties down, but decrease the LVR that they’re prepared to lend me. Interest rates go up so I’m caught in a personal perfect finacial storm.

    I can’t sell because the markets gone to the crapper , and even if I could sell , because I’ve drawn down my available equity , It’s got to the point where all of the funds I’d have available after sale are going to pay for the CGT , which now no longer has a 50 % rebate.

    Also because I’ve been claiming depreciation off all my properties ( and the depreciation you claim is taken of the capital base cost when working out CGT ) , the capital base cost of my properties is lower , so my capital gains tax is even higher.

    I’m stuffed.

    I think there is a place for living off equity , but to use it as a plan for retirement ( unless you’re loaded with a very low LVR ) is too risky.
    To talk about doing it with LVR’s of around 80 % which is suggested by some , leaves no margin for error if there’s a prolonged downturn or change in the playing field. After all we’ve just had the longest boom for a long term , who’s to say we won’t have a prolonged down turn.

    Change in banking practice ? I can remember as a young Doctor a few years ago ( around 1984… sheese …) being knocked back for a loan on an entry level unit in Homebush west , because I hadn’t had the required deposit save up for the preceeding 2 years ( or something like that ). Rolf / Simon where were you then ….:)

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    Interesting way of looking at things DD.

    Else where you’ve been saying that unit prices have been going up because first home buyers can no longer afford houses. ( I agree )

    Now your saying that the increase in unit prices will force house prices to go up. Can’t quite see the logic in that given our first assumption.

    Every where else I’ve watched in this cycle house prices have gone up to be followed by units , but in all of those areas , subsequently houses prices have started going down ( as the are in logan ).

    Given that Logan was one of the last places in a major East coast city to start moving in the current cycle, I will be most suprised if the tables turn and Logan is one of the first places to start moving up at this stage cycle.

    I’d be quite happy if it did [biggrin], but very suprised. The agents I’ve talked to there in the last week report the market is still pretty dead.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    Havn’t talked to our PM’s recently , but the only one’s we’ve had problems renting out in the past have been a couple of earlier buys which in retrospect had problems. Since off load at nice capital gain..:)

    All of our other properties have rented easily when vacant.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by Yasmina:

    I have been driving around Woodridge area for couple days now, but because i never crossed my foot this way before, it is so hard to tell what is a good deal and what isn’t. Can anybody tell me something about Woodrigde? Woodrigde v Logan?
    Anything would help.

    Yasmina

    It gets confusing as the council area is logan , and some people talk about logan when they’re really talking about Kingston / Woodridge / Logan central etc. ( at least that’s what I think about )

    Different people will give you different opinions as to which are better, but I think you need to have a look around the area and see which streets look ok , and which ones look ratty .

    One of the attractions of logan is that it’s relatively central for a cheap area in Brisbane , and it has train stations and access to freeways.

    It’s also been the target of some urban renewal , though I didn’t see it before :)

    We went for houses in preference to units as the strata fees eat into the rent.

    You should be able to pick up an entry level house in reasonable condition for under 170.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66

    47

    Will never retire. Will always be doing something . If I was financially free now I’d spend some years song writing

    My Father has finally retired, at age 78 . My mother is over 80 and is brushing up on her French so she can teach it …

    If I didn’t have three kids at private schools I could probably be financial free now , though four years ago the answer would have been ” What’s that ….”. If we sold our PPOR in sydney and moved else where the answer would also now.
    Otherwise depends on what happens in the market.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by Dazzling:

    So now that you have been made aware of this fascinating information – what do you intend on doing with it ?? And how specifically does it integrate with the tiny portions of real estate that you actually own ??

    I’d really be interested in your answer as I personally don’t see any connection. How does it affect your current or next specific deal ??

    Cheers,

    Dazzling

    “No point having a cake if you can’t eat it.”

    So you’re only interested in info relating to your next deal ?

    You have no interest in how the economy is going overall ?

    Or do you just like questioning the logic of people who post info which has any sort of negative implication , regardless of the time frame….

    Yes , it would be a nice world if there was only positive news out there. Personally I like to hear all the info , so I can have on idea on what could happen further down the line.

    And this does have practical application on what I do today. If I was convinced that we were going into a period of strong growth , then I’d have a higher LVR on my portfolio . At the moment I’m taking a more cautious approach. I’m still going to get where I want to get to.

    No point in wearing rose tinted glasses all the time…..

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by AnneLeo:

    Sledge,

    I must say what an interesting response. How powerful did you make SeeChange?

    Anne.

    Anne I think Sledge’s name and reaction say it all. If it had been a genuine question they would have reacted differently.

    I think many people thought the same about the post, but didn’t bother responding. Normally I don’t.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by dmichie:

    No, the way the Australian Property market works has already changed. The bubble is deflating and we are very unlikely to see much real capital growth (i.e. above inflation) for the next 10 years. So your strategy of buying and holding property may have worked brilliantly for the past 10 years, but its not going to work for the next 10.

    dmichie

    You’re making an assumption that I’m a buy and hold investor. I’m not.

    I had my own particular approach to the market over the last three years.

    I’ve worked in Sydneys west for the last 17 years, so I saw first hand what happend during the long down period. I also saw what was happening when prices doubled in places like Mt Duitt over a fraily short period. We were busy doing a subdivision at the other end of the market ( stumbled on to that more by accident ) on our Pymble PPOR but when we finshed that I quickly realised that “cash flow positive ” was the latest buzz word, and those areas were subsequently experiencing very nice capital growth.

    So as a result we bought a moderate number of cash flow positive properties ( some weren’t actually cash flow positive – more neutral ) and in the last six months we have sold a bit over half our portfolio. After Capital Gains tax we will potentially own several IP’s outright (we’re puting the money into offest accounts while we work out our next moves ) . These are enough to fund a basic retirement if that’s what we wanted to do. That’s not bad for three years investing. The one’s we’ve kept are returning over 10 %

    Because like you I don’t expect significant growth in the property market in the near future we’re looking at investing our money in other areas prior to the property market moving again though I do have my eye on one particular suburb in Sydney :) and if I can pick up a couple of real bargains I may buy there in the next 2-3 years.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by dmichie:

    The great economic success stories of the past 60 years (Germany, Japan and now China) were not created by building houses, they were created with exports. You cannot create wealth by buying and selling houses, real wealth is created by selling something to the rest of the world.

    Dmichie

    I can see your view point , however by taking that view point , you will not change the way the Australian Property market works.

    An alternative view would be to say ” OK I don’t like it , but I can see how to profit from it. I’ll make as much money from the property market as I can , and then I’ll use the money I’ve made to fund the launch , promotion of my wiz bang Computer “

    Personally I got sick of busting my guts and getting an ever decreasing income for a fairly stressfull job and at the age of 40 realising I’d have to keep on doing for a many more years. I’m quite happy to make money just for the sake of making money.

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by resiwealth:

    I want to issue a warning to people on this site not to be conned and scammed buy one of the best i have met in 15 years.

    Adds are back into the Fin Review and they are going to do it again. We got caught for just under 3 million dollars, yes u read it wright.

    The company is a medical imaging company (body scanning and other stuff).

    can i give more details on this site????

    resiwealth

    Resi

    Any links to ASICS or any other government bodies ?

    See Change

    Profile photo of SeeChangeSeeChange
    Member
    @seechange
    Join Date: 2003
    Post Count: 66
    Originally posted by Sledge:

    Thanks for your help. Are you all so friendly in here or is it just you.

    Sledge

    Yes [biggrin]

    Flattery will get you no where …..[baaa]

    See Change

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 65 total)