<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | Roughana | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/roughana/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/roughana/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Roughana.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 21:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9637b0448f98ef5518d19643860b4ed0</guid>
				<title>Roughana replied to the topic already bought negative geared property in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389048-already-bought-negative-geared-property/#post-4564984</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 14:48:03 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you sell something, you will have a number of costs.<br />
I would consider selling if the amount that I have left after selling can be used in a way that returns a better result than holding on to it.</p>
<p>If your negatively geared property is currently performing as you expected, how about holding it and purchasing a number of positively geared&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-260293"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389048-already-bought-negative-geared-property/#post-4564984" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a11680f812f952dc2c49b97f01ffef91</guid>
				<title>Roughana replied to the topic A Deal... Too Good To Be True? in the forum The Treasure Chest</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389028-a-deal-too-good-to-be-true/#post-4564876</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2002 14:35:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the current tennant interested in purchasing the property in wrap deal?</p>
<p>If so, perhaps the real estate agent could be avoided altogether with us providing the &#8216;finance&#8217; for the tennant to do this. This would give us a negotiating point on the value of the agents commission.</p>
<p>Regardless of the above, we should negotiate a reduction on the&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-102288"><a href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389028-a-deal-too-good-to-be-true/#post-4564876" rel="nofollow">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 244/348 queries in 0.086 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-15 07:38:54 by W3 Total Cache
-->