<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PropertyInvesting.com | robster | Activity</title>
	<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/robster/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.propertyinvesting.com/members/robster/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for robster.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 20:17:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">357d6735c61c3a633a3659d5fb7e2e1b</guid>
				<title>robster replied to the topic What do you think of these figures? in the forum General Property</title>
				<link>https://www.propertyinvesting.com/topic/4389596-what-do-you-think-of-these-figures/#post-4567625</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 10:42:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m interested in these figures, out of interest.  I mean, according to the book I&#039;m reading (1mil in a year) the purchase price should only be $80k  (rent div 2 x 1000).  That would indicate this property would be a no go, is that correct?  I mean, in reality also, is there such a thing as a place in Aus (anywhere!) for $80k anymore?Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (Page is feed) 
Minified using apc
Database Caching 287/348 queries in 0.077 seconds using apc

Served from: www.propertyinvesting.com @ 2026-04-18 06:20:44 by W3 Total Cache
-->