You should check out if you can do the covered calls on the US Stock Market with Aussie super funds. It is much easier and the blocks are smaller. There is also a wider diversity of stocks to select from and more movement. You can always do the covered puts as well!
That is right Terry. You started the other one didn’t you?
I posted my lengthy response here to Michael’s comments after being asked in your thread by John why I didn’t respond to Micahel in the same manner that I did to you. I had not read Michael’s earlier comments about living off equity so I went back, read them and responded.
Originally posted by Still in School:
* Buy Writes (cover calls) but only on the following stocks. OST, LHG, SRP, QAN (reason being, is that they are under $3.50)…
I don’t understand why you would restrict yourself to a low ‘dollar value per share’ stock group. It is all relative to company performance regardless of stock price.
SIS, when I say property, I do include property-related investments like MBS.
If you are referring to self-managed super, I think you will find it difficult to invest in the higher return – higher risk type investments. It is very restrictive what you can and cannot invest in.
I am very interested in hearing what people think of Rick Otton and his reputation in general. I have heard that he presents much of the same material and in much the same way as Steve McKnight.
There is no simple answer. You would invest the funds in assets which produce income and capital growth. I thought it was obvious.
I would look at property and/or shares/managed funds. They tend to be the most consistent and should continue to do so. You would definately need to use dividend reinvestment and…[Read more]
Originally posted by Terryw:
It is great to see someone actually living off equity.
Who is living off equity? I saw a person who used it for one year and used most of the funds to invest in additional income producing assets. I do not consider this ‘living’ off equity.
Rob, you say someone big enough for this should be able to live on their…[Read more]
I would most likely buy a smaller property and keep my debt levels low. It sounds like you would be in mortgage insurance territory if you only have $60k in cash and are looking to buy something for $420k. I am not a fan of blowing thousands of dollars on mortgage insurance.
Also, buying something smaller may leave you with the funds you need to…[Read more]
Jason, one of my main objections to living off equity stems from financing it. For those who understand finance and how lenders operate, it is not reality to think that a retired person can continue borrowing while not working regardless of their rental income.
For most people with a portfolio large enough to be able to live off equity, they just…[Read more]
It is not an issue. It is the ‘purpose’ of the funds that determines deductibility. It doesn’t matter which property is used to secure the money against.
It is strongly recommended that you do not mix up deductible and non-deductible expenditure as it will cause difficulty at tax time.
Also, on your PPOR, I would recommend using an offset…[Read more]
Originally posted by Dazzling:
Having read your very long spiel tearing Michael’s thread to pieces, I’ve got to say I totally disagree with you, and agree fully with what Michael has put forth.
No problem. I hope it works for you.
This might upset you as well, but despite my opposition to the IC club – which you know about – many of the senior…[Read more]
Originally posted by MichaelYardney:
What do you do when you eventually own a significant protfolio of proeprties. Whether they are cash flow positive or not one day you may want to slow down and use your properties for the reason you bought them.
Use them on other investments that generate a positive cashflow and capital growth. Enjoy the money…[Read more]
And as Kay so clearly pointed out in another thread, the tax on $100,000, even after taking super out, would be much less than the figure used as tax in both Michael’s and my examples.