Forum Replies Created
Hi Alex
Sure you can ask me any question you like.
Drop me a short email with the details and i can come back to you.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Alex
O & A – Offer and Acceptance
NCCP = National Consumer Credit Protection (think the acronym is wrong)
LOC = Line of Credit
IO = Interest Only
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Tam
Some lenders may have a problem with it
but your Broker should be able prepare the Credit
submission for you correctly. Remember most
Brokers do not charge any fees.Just be careful listening to the advice of your
Banker. I have a client here on Brisbane who went
to set up a separate loan on his current Ppor (to be investment property) with CBA.
They told him cheaper to make it 1 loan and by borrowing against the security of the IP
he would be able to claim the interest as a deduction.He now has a P & I investment loan mixed in with
a loan for his Ppor deposit. A total mess and wrong in so
many grounds.Simple answer don’t Tax or structuring advice from your Bank Manager.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
I am currently away on holiday so will keep the response fairly brief.
Terry is correct in the US 100 shares make up 1 option Contract and with some
stocks you get 2 expiry dates in the same month.
BP & C (citibank) are 2 examples of such stocksBack to Australia have you considered a long dated instalment warrant.
In the US try a LEAP.Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Yes no dramas in using the equity in your IP although i prefer to use the PPOR as when we refi the IP loan and swing 100% of the debt onto the security itself it keeps in nice and clean.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Dont want to appear rude but i would check those figures yourself as i cant think of any property where you would loose $25,000 clear after Tax.
I am not doubting your Accountant but even if the purchase price was $600,000 and you were only getting $250 / week the loss would be nowhere near that.
If it is draining your savings by $25K per annum post Tax and you dont think the property will ever go up over the coming years then i guess selling it is an option.
Still cant get my head around those figures.
I have 1 or 2 properties in Brissie and not one of mine has falled in value since 2008.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
PM
Couple of quick observations.
$25K sounds like a lot of shortfall each year are you sure this is correct.
Are you sure this is post non cash deductions such as Depreciation / Building Write off as well as any Tax Credit.
Secondly if you sell the property for less than the original purchase price you wont be liable for any CGT rather you will make a
Capital Loss and this can be offset against furture gains.Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Using an interest only loan with 100% offset even though you have no current PPOR gives you flexibility so if you decide to purchase a property for your own occupation in future years you are not having to pay interest on non deductible debt.
You would merely utilise the funds in the offset account and either use this as deposit or gear against the savings themselves.
This strategy just gives you maximum flexibility.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Kristy
The only way it could be done is that if both names are on the Title of the existing property then both of you will need to go on the equity loan secured against the former PPOR. This would be a second or sub loan to any current loan on the property.
Subject to your income you could then take out a separate loan in your name only on the property you are looking to purchase.
Unfortunately the entire loan secured against the former PPOR will be taken as a liability when working out your serviceability.Course when the former home was sold the entire loan secured would need to be discharged.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Jack
If the property is negatively geared and you need to claim the negative gearing each pay period then 99% shares would go to the highest marginal Tax payer and 1% to the other owner.
Course downside is that one day when the property becomes positvely geared then 99% of the income gets allocated to you and also if the property is sold then 99% of the Capital Gain also gets added to your Taxable income for the applicable year.
A Discretionary Family Trust gives you flexibility when it comes to income distribution however you are unable to claim the tax losses in Trust so if this is important probably not the way to go.
There are some excellent no frills style investment loans at the moment so splitting the loan like you have suggested is a good idea and a recommended strategy.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Yes as an authorised agent of the OSR the lender can submit your FHOG application and the funds will be available at Settlement.
They will want you to sign it and provide the relevant Certified Identification but other than that they should prepare it for you.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
If someone else takes out the loan then they will want to be (and the lender will insist) on Title.
This then means it is not your PPOR and could be an IP for them.
They and you loose the Stamp duty concession, may incur CGT and also Land tax depending on the land value etc.
I would do a search on Sydication and read up on some of the problems involved and also ensure you are fully compliant when it comes to advertising for funds.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Again taking the figures from MYOB or any other Accounting program will still show your Net Taxable Income for 10 as $45,000 or less so a lender wont take any other figure into consideration (ignoring Depreciation and non recurring expenses).
Clearly from this declared income there would appear to be insufficient income to service the required loan with 3 dependants.
Any lender that approved the loan on this basis is clearly acting not in your best interest.
The fact that the loan will be short term as you wish to reno the property and then onsell it will not go in your favour.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hayley only incorporated the Company on the 23rd August 2010 and it is currently not registered for GST so i dont think she expects to be Turning over much in the initial stage.
Guess no point in lashing out on a website when your'e not even sure you are going to get past first base.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Nope cant recommend anyone lol
Sorry Steve should be so facetious.
Feel free to drop me a line and certainly i can give you some ideas.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
If you are prepared to give up some of the potential capital growth a shared equity scheme could be an option.
Max lvr is 90% so you would to have a deposit but we are starting to see more and more of these loans evolve.
You might take out a 90% lvr and you make repayments on say 70% with 20% being interest and repayment free.
The lender then takes 40% of the capital growth.Either a way of buying what you want and reducing your repayments or being able to set you repayment and affording something in a higher price bracket than you expected.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
I dont believe under NCCP a lodoc loan would be applicable as you have already stated you have completed your 2010 Tax Return and it showed a Net Profit of $45,000.
There is no justification to then go and state a higher Net Income merely to qualify for a larger loan.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Jess as long as you can produce last 2 Year Tax returns for your husbands business you will be treated exactly the same as anyone in PAYG employment.
Lenders however take your Net Taxable Income for serviceability.
If not the number of lenders reduces but again not unsummountable depending on what documentation you can provide and whether husband is in the same line of work.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
A wrap is a wrap around mortgage where the vendor offers to fund the sale by allowing the purchaser to make payments to him instead of his Bank until the loan is paid off.
The Seller retains Title to the property during the period although the purchase has possession.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Sash you shouldnt have to ask your Broker.
If he knows his onions he should be telling you that CBA will do it standing on your head.
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender



