Forum Replies Created
Yes it is possible if you have equity in a property and can draw on this if not you are going to be hard pushed to do many deals as at some stage in the game you have to part with a deposit (or Call Option Fee) need a Solicitor to draw up a Contract / Option Agreement, put the power on a house so you can renovate it, pay some insurance etc etc.
Great in theory and when you leave the Sales Course you are convinced you are on the road to riches but realistically it doesnt work like that in the current climate.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Must admit we cant put our developments up quick enough.
In saying that however we dont intend to sell them merely build, lease and collect the rents.
One reason BA's are falling is simply the lack of development finance.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Must admit we cant put our developments up quick enough.
In saying that however we dont intend to sell them merely build, lease and collect the rents.
One reason BA's are falling is simply the lack of development finance.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi HG
No cant see an issue in your parents depositing funds into your 100% offset Account (assuming it is a true offset account rather than quazi offset account).
In saying this of course if they receipt a Pension then they will fall into under the deeming Asset rules and the money will be deemed to have received interest even if it hasnt. (Limit on ho wmuch they can gift you each year).
No dramas in buying an IP at the same time just make sure the loan structure is correct.
Dont cross collateralise the loans buy using your PPOR to support the borrowing for the new IP.
Final point to note is i assume your current PPOR will be your PPOR for some years to come.
If not then might want to thing about having it as an IO loan with 100% offset.Usual caveat danger is in the details and with limited information hate to say you get a limited response lol
CheersYours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Without being funny absolutely no point in doing a valuation thru say HTW or CBRE and then finding they are not and accredited valuer with the Bank / lender you intend to use.
Big difference between a Bank valuation and CMA as SNM as suggested however you would be concerned if the figurs were miles apart.Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
It will depend on other factors which include:
1) Is it your first purchase?
2) Is it owner occupied?
3) Is the purchase price under $500,000?
4) Is it owner occupied.?
5) How much do you need to borrow?Once you now this you can work out some of the costs involved.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Vic
Never had a Bank undercut me in 22 years usually the other way around.
A good MB can structure your loan correctly to make sure it is set up right for you wheareas a Bank manager / loans officer has no interest in doing this and in most cases no idea either.
An example was a client today who was told by his CBA branch manager that he had a 100% offset account and that he should deposit all of his income into this account and then redraw it when necessary. Unfortunately it turns out that after making $96,000 deposit into the account over the last few years he has decided to withdrawn only for us to advise that he has now contaminated the interest deductibility and he cannot claim this as a deduction.
Of course had he had a proper 100% offset account set up he would have been laughing.
To save 0.1% initially and now find it will cost forever and a day is an expensive error.
If you have been offered that on a 95% lvr i would complain as Yes you could find a cheaper rate but at what overall and long term cost. Just bear in mind the MISA account CBA trot out as there offset account is not fully transactional.
If the loan is interest only i wouldnt go with SGB either and consider NAB at 6.54% or Anz.
Both have a fully transactional offset account. Anz will also require you have existing relationship with them.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Ok might have an issue there as Westpac wont do 3 properties on the same Title and unlikely you would get separate land Titles until the buildings are constructed.
LMI isnt going to be cheap depending on the total loan amount.
Cheers
'Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Nothing wrong with Bankwest and Yes no problems in saying it on the forum.
Typical Bank though they want a bit of everything when it comes to security and wouldnt now how to structure a loan to suit a customer.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Bayer who is the lender ?
Sorry but is doesnt sound right. The interest is non deductible being on your PPOR so guess that doesnt matter.
Redraw and offset are a mile apart.
Lenders will tell you they are the same thing but they are not.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Matt
Realistically unless the deal is very stong most lenders wont lend anything against the business value itself.
If you buy a recognised franchise then it might be slightly different you might get 60% lvr but a small leasehold business you wont get anything like that.
Depends on the business itself as to whether potential income will be taken into consideration.
Sorry it sounds vague but that is business lending for you in the current climate.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Matt
All depends on what is being offered as security:
1) Residential property then the Rates are ok subject to equity position.
2) Business itself – Good luck.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Bayer
Hate to say at 6.2% it will not be a true offset account but more like a redraw offset account within the loan.
Such structure can be a total mess if the loans were for investment.
Personally i would have them all separate and standalone and certainly not have your PPOR acting as security.
Clients seem to think interest rate is the most important factor however this is not the case for successful investment.
Sounds like you need some impartial advice as clearly your Bank is not giving you that if they are suggesting you use your PPOR as security. Might protect them but wont do anything for you.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Sorry Thommo
But i have to disagree with Marjac.
I believe you would get 90% lvr if done correctly.
I think the enquiries have increased simply because very few lenders left are doing development deals of any kind.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Bayer
No not messy at all although if the existing lender settles you might be up for some costs or exit fees etc.
Ideally want to get the new lender on board asap so that things are happening quickly.I have a deal in at the moment where Settlement is on the 14th Nov and i am very confident we can make that date so 22nd shouldnt be a problem.
All depends on the balance of information.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hi Thommo
Small development finance is at a premium so without more information it is difficult to comment.
It is an area we probably are getting the most number of enquiries from at the moment and there is no right or wrong answer.
Would depend on the balance of the deal.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Normally you wouldnt nominate son or daughter but merely children of the Trustees
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hate to say i disagree.
You can certainly put a condition /s in the purchase contract that the Seller serve the appropriate period of notice on the tenant to allow you access to the property for whatever reason.
As long as the required period of notice has been given there is nothing the Tenant can say or do.
Also you could include a condition that the Seller serve the appropriate notice to end the periodic tenancy under the term of Contract (In Qld it would be 60 days notice).
The condition could read that the Seller agree to offer the existing tenants a new Tenancy at a given rent and if they dont sign the amended lease within a given period of time the seller agrees to serve the appropriate notice to end the lease agreement.
Done 101 times for all sorts of reasons.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hate to say i disagree.
You can certainly put a condition /s in the purchase contract that the Seller serve the appropriate period of notice on the tenant to allow you access to the property for whatever reason.
As long as the required period of notice has been given there is nothing the Tenant can say or do.
Also you could include a condition that the Seller serve the appropriate notice to end the periodic tenancy under the term of Contract (In Qld it would be 60 days notice).
The condition could read that the Seller agree to offer the existing tenants a new Tenancy at a given rent and if they dont sign the amended lease within a given period of time the seller agrees to serve the appropriate notice to end the lease agreement.
Done 101 times for all sorts of reasons.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender
Hate to say i disagree.
You can certainly put a condition /s in the purchase contract that the Seller serve the appropriate period of notice on the tenant to allow you access to the property for whatever reason.
As long as the required period of notice has been given there is nothing the Tenant can say or do.
Also you could include a condition that the Seller serve the appropriate notice to end the periodic tenancy under the term of Contract (In Qld it would be 60 notice).
The condition could read that the Seller agree to offer the existing tenants a new Tenancy at a given rent and if they dont sign the amended lease within a given period of time the seller agrees to serve the appropriate notice to end the lease agreement.
Done 101 times for all sorts of reasons.
Cheers
Yours in Finance
Richard Taylor | Australia's leading private lender



